Estimation of standard errors and treatment effects in empirical economics: methods and applications

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Olaf Hübler
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

Titel in ÜbersetzungSchätzung von Standardfehlern und Kausaleffekten in der empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung: Methoden und Anwendungen
OriginalspracheMehrere Sprachen
Seiten (von - bis)43-62
Seitenumfang20
FachzeitschriftJournal for Labour Market Research
Jahrgang47
Ausgabenummer1-2
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - März 2014

Abstract

This paper discusses methodological problems of standard errors and treatment effects. First, heteroskedasticity- and cluster-robust estimates are considered as well as problems with Bernoulli distributed regressors, outliers and partially identified parameters. Second, procedures to determine treatment effects are analyzed. Four principles are in the focus: difference-in-differences estimators, matching procedures, treatment effects in quantile regression analysis and regression discontinuity approaches. These methods are applied to Cobb-Douglas functions using IAB establishment panel data. Different heteroskedasticity-consistent procedures lead to similar results of standard errors. Cluster-robust estimates show evident deviates. Dummies with a mean near 0.5 have a smaller variance of the coefficient estimates than others. Not all outliers have a strong influence on significance. New methods to handle the problem of partially identified parameters lead to more efficient estimates. The four discussed treatment procedures are applied to the question whether company-level pacts affect the output. In contrast to unconditional difference-in-differences and to estimates without matching the company-level effect is positive but insignificant if conditional difference-in-differences, nearest-neighbor or Mahalanobis metric matching is applied. The latter result has to be specified under quantile treatment effects analysis. The higher the quantile the higher is the positive company-level pact effect and there is a tendency from insignificant to significant effects. A sharp regression discontinuity analysis shows a structural break at a probability of 0.5 that a company-level pact exists. No specific effect of the Great Recession can be detected. Fuzzy regression discontinuity estimates reveal that the company-level pact effect is significantly lower in East than in West Germany.

Schlagwörter

    DiD estimators, Matching, Outliers, Partially identified parameters, Quantile regressions, Regression discontinuity, Standard errors

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Estimation of standard errors and treatment effects in empirical economics: methods and applications. / Hübler, Olaf.
in: Journal for Labour Market Research, Jahrgang 47, Nr. 1-2, 03.2014, S. 43-62.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Hübler O. Estimation of standard errors and treatment effects in empirical economics: methods and applications. Journal for Labour Market Research. 2014 Mär;47(1-2):43-62. doi: 10.1007/s12651-013-0135-0
Hübler, Olaf. / Estimation of standard errors and treatment effects in empirical economics : methods and applications. in: Journal for Labour Market Research. 2014 ; Jahrgang 47, Nr. 1-2. S. 43-62.
Download
@article{32538befdbe34ea98b64a344002976ef,
title = "Estimation of standard errors and treatment effects in empirical economics: methods and applications",
abstract = "This paper discusses methodological problems of standard errors and treatment effects. First, heteroskedasticity- and cluster-robust estimates are considered as well as problems with Bernoulli distributed regressors, outliers and partially identified parameters. Second, procedures to determine treatment effects are analyzed. Four principles are in the focus: difference-in-differences estimators, matching procedures, treatment effects in quantile regression analysis and regression discontinuity approaches. These methods are applied to Cobb-Douglas functions using IAB establishment panel data. Different heteroskedasticity-consistent procedures lead to similar results of standard errors. Cluster-robust estimates show evident deviates. Dummies with a mean near 0.5 have a smaller variance of the coefficient estimates than others. Not all outliers have a strong influence on significance. New methods to handle the problem of partially identified parameters lead to more efficient estimates. The four discussed treatment procedures are applied to the question whether company-level pacts affect the output. In contrast to unconditional difference-in-differences and to estimates without matching the company-level effect is positive but insignificant if conditional difference-in-differences, nearest-neighbor or Mahalanobis metric matching is applied. The latter result has to be specified under quantile treatment effects analysis. The higher the quantile the higher is the positive company-level pact effect and there is a tendency from insignificant to significant effects. A sharp regression discontinuity analysis shows a structural break at a probability of 0.5 that a company-level pact exists. No specific effect of the Great Recession can be detected. Fuzzy regression discontinuity estimates reveal that the company-level pact effect is significantly lower in East than in West Germany.",
keywords = "DiD estimators, Matching, Outliers, Partially identified parameters, Quantile regressions, Regression discontinuity, Standard errors",
author = "Olaf H{\"u}bler",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1007/s12651-013-0135-0",
language = "Multiple languages",
volume = "47",
pages = "43--62",
number = "1-2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimation of standard errors and treatment effects in empirical economics

T2 - methods and applications

AU - Hübler, Olaf

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - This paper discusses methodological problems of standard errors and treatment effects. First, heteroskedasticity- and cluster-robust estimates are considered as well as problems with Bernoulli distributed regressors, outliers and partially identified parameters. Second, procedures to determine treatment effects are analyzed. Four principles are in the focus: difference-in-differences estimators, matching procedures, treatment effects in quantile regression analysis and regression discontinuity approaches. These methods are applied to Cobb-Douglas functions using IAB establishment panel data. Different heteroskedasticity-consistent procedures lead to similar results of standard errors. Cluster-robust estimates show evident deviates. Dummies with a mean near 0.5 have a smaller variance of the coefficient estimates than others. Not all outliers have a strong influence on significance. New methods to handle the problem of partially identified parameters lead to more efficient estimates. The four discussed treatment procedures are applied to the question whether company-level pacts affect the output. In contrast to unconditional difference-in-differences and to estimates without matching the company-level effect is positive but insignificant if conditional difference-in-differences, nearest-neighbor or Mahalanobis metric matching is applied. The latter result has to be specified under quantile treatment effects analysis. The higher the quantile the higher is the positive company-level pact effect and there is a tendency from insignificant to significant effects. A sharp regression discontinuity analysis shows a structural break at a probability of 0.5 that a company-level pact exists. No specific effect of the Great Recession can be detected. Fuzzy regression discontinuity estimates reveal that the company-level pact effect is significantly lower in East than in West Germany.

AB - This paper discusses methodological problems of standard errors and treatment effects. First, heteroskedasticity- and cluster-robust estimates are considered as well as problems with Bernoulli distributed regressors, outliers and partially identified parameters. Second, procedures to determine treatment effects are analyzed. Four principles are in the focus: difference-in-differences estimators, matching procedures, treatment effects in quantile regression analysis and regression discontinuity approaches. These methods are applied to Cobb-Douglas functions using IAB establishment panel data. Different heteroskedasticity-consistent procedures lead to similar results of standard errors. Cluster-robust estimates show evident deviates. Dummies with a mean near 0.5 have a smaller variance of the coefficient estimates than others. Not all outliers have a strong influence on significance. New methods to handle the problem of partially identified parameters lead to more efficient estimates. The four discussed treatment procedures are applied to the question whether company-level pacts affect the output. In contrast to unconditional difference-in-differences and to estimates without matching the company-level effect is positive but insignificant if conditional difference-in-differences, nearest-neighbor or Mahalanobis metric matching is applied. The latter result has to be specified under quantile treatment effects analysis. The higher the quantile the higher is the positive company-level pact effect and there is a tendency from insignificant to significant effects. A sharp regression discontinuity analysis shows a structural break at a probability of 0.5 that a company-level pact exists. No specific effect of the Great Recession can be detected. Fuzzy regression discontinuity estimates reveal that the company-level pact effect is significantly lower in East than in West Germany.

KW - DiD estimators

KW - Matching

KW - Outliers

KW - Partially identified parameters

KW - Quantile regressions

KW - Regression discontinuity

KW - Standard errors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975217325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12651-013-0135-0

DO - 10.1007/s12651-013-0135-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84975217325

VL - 47

SP - 43

EP - 62

JO - Journal for Labour Market Research

JF - Journal for Labour Market Research

SN - 1614-3485

IS - 1-2

ER -