Epistemic Beliefs in Science: A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • IPN - Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik
  • Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
  • ETH Zürich
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1541–1575
Seitenumfang35
FachzeitschriftEducational Psychology Review
Jahrgang34
Ausgabenummer3
Frühes Online-Datum12 Feb. 2022
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Sept. 2022

Abstract

Recent research has integrated developmental and dimensional perspectives on epistemic beliefs by implementing an approach in which profiles of learners’ epistemic beliefs are modeled across multiple dimensions. Variability in study characteristics has impeded the comparison of profiles of epistemic beliefs and their relations with external variables across studies. We examined this comparability by integrating data on epistemic beliefs about the source, certainty, development, and justification of knowledge in science from six studies comprising N = 10,932 German students from elementary to upper secondary school. Applying latent profile analyses to these data, we found that profiles of epistemic beliefs that were previously conceptualized were robust across multiple samples. We found indications that profiles of epistemic beliefs homogenize over the course of students’ education, are related to school tracking, and demonstrate robust relations with students’ personal characteristics and socioeconomic background. We discuss implications for the theory, assessment, and education of epistemic beliefs.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Epistemic Beliefs in Science: A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies. / Schiefer, Julia; Edelsbrunner, Peter; Bernholt, Andrea et al.
in: Educational Psychology Review, Jahrgang 34, Nr. 3, 09.2022, S. 1541–1575.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Schiefer J, Edelsbrunner P, Bernholt A, Kampa N, Nehring A. Epistemic Beliefs in Science: A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies. Educational Psychology Review. 2022 Sep;34(3):1541–1575. Epub 2022 Feb 12. doi: 10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w
Schiefer, Julia ; Edelsbrunner, Peter ; Bernholt, Andrea et al. / Epistemic Beliefs in Science : A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies. in: Educational Psychology Review. 2022 ; Jahrgang 34, Nr. 3. S. 1541–1575.
Download
@article{6846557aacec4732bc68c810b083fbca,
title = "Epistemic Beliefs in Science: A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies",
abstract = "Recent research has integrated developmental and dimensional perspectives on epistemic beliefs by implementing an approach in which profiles of learners{\textquoteright} epistemic beliefs are modeled across multiple dimensions. Variability in study characteristics has impeded the comparison of profiles of epistemic beliefs and their relations with external variables across studies. We examined this comparability by integrating data on epistemic beliefs about the source, certainty, development, and justification of knowledge in science from six studies comprising N = 10,932 German students from elementary to upper secondary school. Applying latent profile analyses to these data, we found that profiles of epistemic beliefs that were previously conceptualized were robust across multiple samples. We found indications that profiles of epistemic beliefs homogenize over the course of students{\textquoteright} education, are related to school tracking, and demonstrate robust relations with students{\textquoteright} personal characteristics and socioeconomic background. We discuss implications for the theory, assessment, and education of epistemic beliefs.",
keywords = "Development, Epistemic beliefs, Latent profile analysis, Primary school, Secondary school",
author = "Julia Schiefer and Peter Edelsbrunner and Andrea Bernholt and Nele Kampa and Andreas Nehring",
note = "Funding Information: This study was supported by the Hector Foundation II, the German Telekom Foundation, and the T{\"u}bingen Postdoctoral Academy for Research on Education (PACE) at the Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology (Study 1), by the Swedish Research Council via grant number 721-2013-2180 (Study 4), and by the German Research Foundation via grant number grant NE 2105/1-1 (Study 6). We thank Eric Klopp and Martin Schwichow for extensive feedback on a draft of this manuscript, and Gabriel Nagy for helpful comments on a presentation of this work.",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1541–1575",
journal = "Educational Psychology Review",
issn = "1040-726X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epistemic Beliefs in Science

T2 - A Systematic Integration of Evidence From Multiple Studies

AU - Schiefer, Julia

AU - Edelsbrunner, Peter

AU - Bernholt, Andrea

AU - Kampa, Nele

AU - Nehring, Andreas

N1 - Funding Information: This study was supported by the Hector Foundation II, the German Telekom Foundation, and the Tübingen Postdoctoral Academy for Research on Education (PACE) at the Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology (Study 1), by the Swedish Research Council via grant number 721-2013-2180 (Study 4), and by the German Research Foundation via grant number grant NE 2105/1-1 (Study 6). We thank Eric Klopp and Martin Schwichow for extensive feedback on a draft of this manuscript, and Gabriel Nagy for helpful comments on a presentation of this work.

PY - 2022/9

Y1 - 2022/9

N2 - Recent research has integrated developmental and dimensional perspectives on epistemic beliefs by implementing an approach in which profiles of learners’ epistemic beliefs are modeled across multiple dimensions. Variability in study characteristics has impeded the comparison of profiles of epistemic beliefs and their relations with external variables across studies. We examined this comparability by integrating data on epistemic beliefs about the source, certainty, development, and justification of knowledge in science from six studies comprising N = 10,932 German students from elementary to upper secondary school. Applying latent profile analyses to these data, we found that profiles of epistemic beliefs that were previously conceptualized were robust across multiple samples. We found indications that profiles of epistemic beliefs homogenize over the course of students’ education, are related to school tracking, and demonstrate robust relations with students’ personal characteristics and socioeconomic background. We discuss implications for the theory, assessment, and education of epistemic beliefs.

AB - Recent research has integrated developmental and dimensional perspectives on epistemic beliefs by implementing an approach in which profiles of learners’ epistemic beliefs are modeled across multiple dimensions. Variability in study characteristics has impeded the comparison of profiles of epistemic beliefs and their relations with external variables across studies. We examined this comparability by integrating data on epistemic beliefs about the source, certainty, development, and justification of knowledge in science from six studies comprising N = 10,932 German students from elementary to upper secondary school. Applying latent profile analyses to these data, we found that profiles of epistemic beliefs that were previously conceptualized were robust across multiple samples. We found indications that profiles of epistemic beliefs homogenize over the course of students’ education, are related to school tracking, and demonstrate robust relations with students’ personal characteristics and socioeconomic background. We discuss implications for the theory, assessment, and education of epistemic beliefs.

KW - Development

KW - Epistemic beliefs

KW - Latent profile analysis

KW - Primary school

KW - Secondary school

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124737685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w

DO - 10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 1541

EP - 1575

JO - Educational Psychology Review

JF - Educational Psychology Review

SN - 1040-726X

IS - 3

ER -

Von denselben Autoren