Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Aufsatznummer | 112539 |
Fachzeitschrift | Energy conversion and management |
Jahrgang | 208 |
Frühes Online-Datum | 19 Feb. 2020 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 15 März 2020 |
Abstract
While grid fees have a major impact on energy costs of large consumers, they can be reduced via peak shaving using electrical energy storages, like lithium ion, lead acid, or redox flow batteries. Especially in Germany, there are further options, namely making use of intensive and atypical grid usage, to reduce the regular grid fee. In the present analysis, we examined load profiles of more than 5,300 company sites and checked under which circumstances electrical energy storage can be profitably applied to reduce the grid fee in the three mentioned ways. Here, the calculation of each company specific grid fee was performed compliant to the German regulatory scheme with fixed power- and energy-dependent prices as well as considering the actual prices charged by the connected grid operators. The analysis showed, that the power price for grid usage as well as the investment costs for energy storages are most important for the profitability of general peak shaving, while the concrete shape of the load profile determines the capacity with the shortest payback period. The intensive grid usage is the most promising revenue model, if the formal requirements are met. The atypical grid usage is the second most profitable approach. In most cases, lithium ion storages were most cost-effective, compared to lead acid and redox flow batteries. A future reduction of storage investment costs will lead to an increase of profitable projects especially concerning the individual grid fees. For the general grid fee, a massive price reduction of more than 50 % is necessary to achieve payback periods of less than five years for a noteworthy number of company sites.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Energie (insg.)
- Erneuerbare Energien, Nachhaltigkeit und Umwelt
- Energie (insg.)
- Kernenergie und Kernkraftwerkstechnik
- Energie (insg.)
- Feuerungstechnik
- Energie (insg.)
- Energieanlagenbau und Kraftwerkstechnik
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Energy conversion and management, Jahrgang 208, 112539, 15.03.2020.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrical energy storage for industrial grid fee reduction
T2 - A large scale analysis
AU - Tiemann, Paul Hendrik
AU - Bensmann, Astrid
AU - Stuke, Volker
AU - Hanke-Rauschenbach, Richard
N1 - Funding Information: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
PY - 2020/3/15
Y1 - 2020/3/15
N2 - While grid fees have a major impact on energy costs of large consumers, they can be reduced via peak shaving using electrical energy storages, like lithium ion, lead acid, or redox flow batteries. Especially in Germany, there are further options, namely making use of intensive and atypical grid usage, to reduce the regular grid fee. In the present analysis, we examined load profiles of more than 5,300 company sites and checked under which circumstances electrical energy storage can be profitably applied to reduce the grid fee in the three mentioned ways. Here, the calculation of each company specific grid fee was performed compliant to the German regulatory scheme with fixed power- and energy-dependent prices as well as considering the actual prices charged by the connected grid operators. The analysis showed, that the power price for grid usage as well as the investment costs for energy storages are most important for the profitability of general peak shaving, while the concrete shape of the load profile determines the capacity with the shortest payback period. The intensive grid usage is the most promising revenue model, if the formal requirements are met. The atypical grid usage is the second most profitable approach. In most cases, lithium ion storages were most cost-effective, compared to lead acid and redox flow batteries. A future reduction of storage investment costs will lead to an increase of profitable projects especially concerning the individual grid fees. For the general grid fee, a massive price reduction of more than 50 % is necessary to achieve payback periods of less than five years for a noteworthy number of company sites.
AB - While grid fees have a major impact on energy costs of large consumers, they can be reduced via peak shaving using electrical energy storages, like lithium ion, lead acid, or redox flow batteries. Especially in Germany, there are further options, namely making use of intensive and atypical grid usage, to reduce the regular grid fee. In the present analysis, we examined load profiles of more than 5,300 company sites and checked under which circumstances electrical energy storage can be profitably applied to reduce the grid fee in the three mentioned ways. Here, the calculation of each company specific grid fee was performed compliant to the German regulatory scheme with fixed power- and energy-dependent prices as well as considering the actual prices charged by the connected grid operators. The analysis showed, that the power price for grid usage as well as the investment costs for energy storages are most important for the profitability of general peak shaving, while the concrete shape of the load profile determines the capacity with the shortest payback period. The intensive grid usage is the most promising revenue model, if the formal requirements are met. The atypical grid usage is the second most profitable approach. In most cases, lithium ion storages were most cost-effective, compared to lead acid and redox flow batteries. A future reduction of storage investment costs will lead to an increase of profitable projects especially concerning the individual grid fees. For the general grid fee, a massive price reduction of more than 50 % is necessary to achieve payback periods of less than five years for a noteworthy number of company sites.
KW - Battery
KW - Electrical energy storage
KW - Grid fee
KW - Peak shaving
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079553762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112539
DO - 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112539
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85079553762
VL - 208
JO - Energy conversion and management
JF - Energy conversion and management
SN - 0196-8904
M1 - 112539
ER -