Efficiency comparison of MCMC and Transport Map Bayesian posterior estimation for structural health monitoring

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Externe Organisationen

  • École normale supérieure Paris-Saclay (ENS Paris-Saclay)
  • The University of Liverpool
  • Tongji University
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer111440
Seitenumfang16
FachzeitschriftMechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Jahrgang216
Frühes Online-Datum30 Apr. 2024
PublikationsstatusElektronisch veröffentlicht (E-Pub) - 30 Apr. 2024

Abstract

In this paper, an alternative to solving Bayesian inverse problems for structural health monitoring based on a variational formulation with so-called transport maps is examined. The Bayesian inverse formulation is a widely used tool in structural health monitoring applications. While Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are often implemented in these settings, they come with the problem of using many model evaluations, which in turn can become quite costly. We focus here on recent developments in the field of transport theory, where the problem is formulated as finding a deterministic, invertible mapping between some easy to evaluate reference density and the posterior. The resulting variational formulation can be solved with integration and optimization methods. We develop a general formulation for the application of transport maps to vibration-based structural health monitoring. Further, we study influences of different integration approaches on the efficiency and accuracy of the transport map approach and compare it to the Transitional MCMC algorithm, a widely used method for structural identification. Both methods are applied to a lower-dimensional dynamic model with uni- and multi-modal properties, as well as to a higher-dimensional neural network surrogate system of an airplane structure. We find that transport maps have a significant increase in accuracy and efficiency, when used in the right circumstances.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Efficiency comparison of MCMC and Transport Map Bayesian posterior estimation for structural health monitoring. / Grashorn, Jan; Broggi, Matteo; Chamoin, Ludovic et al.
in: Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Jahrgang 216, 111440, 01.07.2024.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Grashorn J, Broggi M, Chamoin L, Beer M. Efficiency comparison of MCMC and Transport Map Bayesian posterior estimation for structural health monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2024 Jul 1;216:111440. Epub 2024 Apr 30. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111440
Download
@article{35c2b1e8e6174091adadb1895bfa13a2,
title = "Efficiency comparison of MCMC and Transport Map Bayesian posterior estimation for structural health monitoring",
abstract = "In this paper, an alternative to solving Bayesian inverse problems for structural health monitoring based on a variational formulation with so-called transport maps is examined. The Bayesian inverse formulation is a widely used tool in structural health monitoring applications. While Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are often implemented in these settings, they come with the problem of using many model evaluations, which in turn can become quite costly. We focus here on recent developments in the field of transport theory, where the problem is formulated as finding a deterministic, invertible mapping between some easy to evaluate reference density and the posterior. The resulting variational formulation can be solved with integration and optimization methods. We develop a general formulation for the application of transport maps to vibration-based structural health monitoring. Further, we study influences of different integration approaches on the efficiency and accuracy of the transport map approach and compare it to the Transitional MCMC algorithm, a widely used method for structural identification. Both methods are applied to a lower-dimensional dynamic model with uni- and multi-modal properties, as well as to a higher-dimensional neural network surrogate system of an airplane structure. We find that transport maps have a significant increase in accuracy and efficiency, when used in the right circumstances.",
keywords = "Bayesian updating, Markov chain Monte Carlo, Structural health monitoring, Transport maps, Variational inference",
author = "Jan Grashorn and Matteo Broggi and Ludovic Chamoin and Michael Beer",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s)",
year = "2024",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111440",
language = "English",
volume = "216",
journal = "Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing",
issn = "0888-3270",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficiency comparison of MCMC and Transport Map Bayesian posterior estimation for structural health monitoring

AU - Grashorn, Jan

AU - Broggi, Matteo

AU - Chamoin, Ludovic

AU - Beer, Michael

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)

PY - 2024/4/30

Y1 - 2024/4/30

N2 - In this paper, an alternative to solving Bayesian inverse problems for structural health monitoring based on a variational formulation with so-called transport maps is examined. The Bayesian inverse formulation is a widely used tool in structural health monitoring applications. While Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are often implemented in these settings, they come with the problem of using many model evaluations, which in turn can become quite costly. We focus here on recent developments in the field of transport theory, where the problem is formulated as finding a deterministic, invertible mapping between some easy to evaluate reference density and the posterior. The resulting variational formulation can be solved with integration and optimization methods. We develop a general formulation for the application of transport maps to vibration-based structural health monitoring. Further, we study influences of different integration approaches on the efficiency and accuracy of the transport map approach and compare it to the Transitional MCMC algorithm, a widely used method for structural identification. Both methods are applied to a lower-dimensional dynamic model with uni- and multi-modal properties, as well as to a higher-dimensional neural network surrogate system of an airplane structure. We find that transport maps have a significant increase in accuracy and efficiency, when used in the right circumstances.

AB - In this paper, an alternative to solving Bayesian inverse problems for structural health monitoring based on a variational formulation with so-called transport maps is examined. The Bayesian inverse formulation is a widely used tool in structural health monitoring applications. While Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are often implemented in these settings, they come with the problem of using many model evaluations, which in turn can become quite costly. We focus here on recent developments in the field of transport theory, where the problem is formulated as finding a deterministic, invertible mapping between some easy to evaluate reference density and the posterior. The resulting variational formulation can be solved with integration and optimization methods. We develop a general formulation for the application of transport maps to vibration-based structural health monitoring. Further, we study influences of different integration approaches on the efficiency and accuracy of the transport map approach and compare it to the Transitional MCMC algorithm, a widely used method for structural identification. Both methods are applied to a lower-dimensional dynamic model with uni- and multi-modal properties, as well as to a higher-dimensional neural network surrogate system of an airplane structure. We find that transport maps have a significant increase in accuracy and efficiency, when used in the right circumstances.

KW - Bayesian updating

KW - Markov chain Monte Carlo

KW - Structural health monitoring

KW - Transport maps

KW - Variational inference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191653620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111440

DO - 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111440

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85191653620

VL - 216

JO - Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

JF - Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

SN - 0888-3270

M1 - 111440

ER -

Von denselben Autoren