Doing GenderBody and Gendered Probation. A Case (Re)Constructive Analysis of Gendered Probation

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)78-93
Seitenumfang16
FachzeitschriftEthics in Progress
Jahrgang14
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 31 Juli 2023

Abstract

With the present article an extension of the doing gender concept by another important dimension, the body, is proposed. Butler showed that sex results from the materialization and we argue that not only gender emerges from interactive doing, but also does sex. This process is called Doing GenderBody and interestingly we showed that it is not done by doing the gender. After the inactive production of a gender/sex, it follows an evaluation process of this produced gender/sex, called the probation. Moreover, this gender/sex must be a valuable contribution to the community. The valency of the probation figure does not only depend on the collective view, but also on a produced sex/gender which contradict the shared gender/sex knowledge. Further, because of this contradiction the single person sees this as a valuable contribution to the community. The analysis of the art works we have done allowed us to show the fundamental modes of the possibility for probation figures to be constructed.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Doing GenderBody and Gendered Probation. A Case (Re)Constructive Analysis of Gendered Probation. / Kirchner, Anna; Zizek, Boris.
in: Ethics in Progress, Jahrgang 14, Nr. 1, 31.07.2023, S. 78-93.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Kirchner A, Zizek B. Doing GenderBody and Gendered Probation. A Case (Re)Constructive Analysis of Gendered Probation. Ethics in Progress. 2023 Jul 31;14(1):78-93. doi: 10.14746/eip.2023.1.5
Kirchner, Anna ; Zizek, Boris. / Doing GenderBody and Gendered Probation. A Case (Re)Constructive Analysis of Gendered Probation. in: Ethics in Progress. 2023 ; Jahrgang 14, Nr. 1. S. 78-93.
Download
@article{f81bc212805b479790465e3375d670da,
title = "Doing GenderBody and Gendered Probation. A Case (Re)Constructive Analysis of Gendered Probation",
abstract = "With the present article an extension of the doing gender concept by another important dimension, the body, is proposed. Butler showed that sex results from the materialization and we argue that not only gender emerges from interactive doing, but also does sex. This process is called Doing GenderBody and interestingly we showed that it is not done by doing the gender. After the inactive production of a gender/sex, it follows an evaluation process of this produced gender/sex, called the probation. Moreover, this gender/sex must be a valuable contribution to the community. The valency of the probation figure does not only depend on the collective view, but also on a produced sex/gender which contradict the shared gender/sex knowledge. Further, because of this contradiction the single person sees this as a valuable contribution to the community. The analysis of the art works we have done allowed us to show the fundamental modes of the possibility for probation figures to be constructed.",
keywords = "(Re)Constructive Analysis, Analysis of Art Works, Doing GenderBody, Gender/Sex as a Relative Location, Gendered Probation, Probation Figures",
author = "Anna Kirchner and Boris Zizek",
year = "2023",
month = jul,
day = "31",
doi = "10.14746/eip.2023.1.5",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "78--93",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doing GenderBody and Gendered Probation. A Case (Re)Constructive Analysis of Gendered Probation

AU - Kirchner, Anna

AU - Zizek, Boris

PY - 2023/7/31

Y1 - 2023/7/31

N2 - With the present article an extension of the doing gender concept by another important dimension, the body, is proposed. Butler showed that sex results from the materialization and we argue that not only gender emerges from interactive doing, but also does sex. This process is called Doing GenderBody and interestingly we showed that it is not done by doing the gender. After the inactive production of a gender/sex, it follows an evaluation process of this produced gender/sex, called the probation. Moreover, this gender/sex must be a valuable contribution to the community. The valency of the probation figure does not only depend on the collective view, but also on a produced sex/gender which contradict the shared gender/sex knowledge. Further, because of this contradiction the single person sees this as a valuable contribution to the community. The analysis of the art works we have done allowed us to show the fundamental modes of the possibility for probation figures to be constructed.

AB - With the present article an extension of the doing gender concept by another important dimension, the body, is proposed. Butler showed that sex results from the materialization and we argue that not only gender emerges from interactive doing, but also does sex. This process is called Doing GenderBody and interestingly we showed that it is not done by doing the gender. After the inactive production of a gender/sex, it follows an evaluation process of this produced gender/sex, called the probation. Moreover, this gender/sex must be a valuable contribution to the community. The valency of the probation figure does not only depend on the collective view, but also on a produced sex/gender which contradict the shared gender/sex knowledge. Further, because of this contradiction the single person sees this as a valuable contribution to the community. The analysis of the art works we have done allowed us to show the fundamental modes of the possibility for probation figures to be constructed.

KW - (Re)Constructive Analysis

KW - Analysis of Art Works

KW - Doing GenderBody

KW - Gender/Sex as a Relative Location

KW - Gendered Probation

KW - Probation Figures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166907156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14746/eip.2023.1.5

DO - 10.14746/eip.2023.1.5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85166907156

VL - 14

SP - 78

EP - 93

JO - Ethics in Progress

JF - Ethics in Progress

IS - 1

ER -

Von denselben Autoren