Do public ownership and lack of competition matter for wages and employment? Evidence from personnel records of a privatized firm

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Blaise Melly
  • Patrick A. Puhani

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Brown University
  • Universitat St. Gallen
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)918-944
Seitenumfang27
FachzeitschriftJournal of the European Economic Association
Jahrgang11
Ausgabenummer4
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Aug. 2013

Abstract

Do public sector firm ownership and lack of competition matter for wages and employment? To address this question, we consider a large public-sector company that is privatized. Using personnel records, we find employment contract liberalization to generate relative wage losses for older, high-tenure, low-skilled, part-time workers, permanent residents, and women. Employment reductions mostly affect the same groups experiencing a wage decline. Overall, wage liberalization leads to an increase in wage inequality of between 6% and 9%, which-if applied to the whole public sector-would lead to a 52% to 76% closure of the "inequality gap" between the private and public sectors in Europe. Our results suggest that differences between public- and private-sector wage structures found in descriptive studies are to a large extent causal rather than the result of selection into these sectors and that public sector employment and career path regulations limit a firm's ability to maintain a competitive workforce.

Zitieren

Do public ownership and lack of competition matter for wages and employment? Evidence from personnel records of a privatized firm. / Melly, Blaise; Puhani, Patrick A.
in: Journal of the European Economic Association, Jahrgang 11, Nr. 4, 01.08.2013, S. 918-944.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{ed671ff58c0242a2b512c9dcca19e55a,
title = "Do public ownership and lack of competition matter for wages and employment? Evidence from personnel records of a privatized firm",
abstract = "Do public sector firm ownership and lack of competition matter for wages and employment? To address this question, we consider a large public-sector company that is privatized. Using personnel records, we find employment contract liberalization to generate relative wage losses for older, high-tenure, low-skilled, part-time workers, permanent residents, and women. Employment reductions mostly affect the same groups experiencing a wage decline. Overall, wage liberalization leads to an increase in wage inequality of between 6% and 9%, which-if applied to the whole public sector-would lead to a 52% to 76% closure of the {"}inequality gap{"} between the private and public sectors in Europe. Our results suggest that differences between public- and private-sector wage structures found in descriptive studies are to a large extent causal rather than the result of selection into these sectors and that public sector employment and career path regulations limit a firm's ability to maintain a competitive workforce.",
author = "Blaise Melly and Puhani, {Patrick A.}",
year = "2013",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jeea.12024",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "918--944",
journal = "Journal of the European Economic Association",
issn = "1542-4766",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do public ownership and lack of competition matter for wages and employment? Evidence from personnel records of a privatized firm

AU - Melly, Blaise

AU - Puhani, Patrick A.

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - Do public sector firm ownership and lack of competition matter for wages and employment? To address this question, we consider a large public-sector company that is privatized. Using personnel records, we find employment contract liberalization to generate relative wage losses for older, high-tenure, low-skilled, part-time workers, permanent residents, and women. Employment reductions mostly affect the same groups experiencing a wage decline. Overall, wage liberalization leads to an increase in wage inequality of between 6% and 9%, which-if applied to the whole public sector-would lead to a 52% to 76% closure of the "inequality gap" between the private and public sectors in Europe. Our results suggest that differences between public- and private-sector wage structures found in descriptive studies are to a large extent causal rather than the result of selection into these sectors and that public sector employment and career path regulations limit a firm's ability to maintain a competitive workforce.

AB - Do public sector firm ownership and lack of competition matter for wages and employment? To address this question, we consider a large public-sector company that is privatized. Using personnel records, we find employment contract liberalization to generate relative wage losses for older, high-tenure, low-skilled, part-time workers, permanent residents, and women. Employment reductions mostly affect the same groups experiencing a wage decline. Overall, wage liberalization leads to an increase in wage inequality of between 6% and 9%, which-if applied to the whole public sector-would lead to a 52% to 76% closure of the "inequality gap" between the private and public sectors in Europe. Our results suggest that differences between public- and private-sector wage structures found in descriptive studies are to a large extent causal rather than the result of selection into these sectors and that public sector employment and career path regulations limit a firm's ability to maintain a competitive workforce.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880725318&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jeea.12024

DO - 10.1111/jeea.12024

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880725318

VL - 11

SP - 918

EP - 944

JO - Journal of the European Economic Association

JF - Journal of the European Economic Association

SN - 1542-4766

IS - 4

ER -