Different thermal conductivity in drilling of cemented compared with cementless hip prostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur: an experimental biomechanical analysis

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Stephan Brand
  • Johannes Klotz
  • Thomas Hassel
  • Maximilian Petri
  • Max Ettinger
  • Christian Krettek
  • Thomas Goesling
  • Friedrich Wilhelm Bach

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1885-1889
Seitenumfang5
FachzeitschriftInternational orthopaedics
Jahrgang37
Ausgabenummer10
Frühes Online-Datum18 Juni 2013
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Okt. 2013

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the different temperature levels whilst drilling cemented and cementless hip prostheses implanted in bovine femora, and to evaluate the insulating function of the cement layer. Methods: Standard hip prostheses were implanted in bovine donor diaphyses, with or without a cement layer. Drilling was then performed using high-performance-cutting drills with a reinforced core, a drilling diameter of 5.5 mm and cooling channels through the tip of the drill for constantly applied internal cooling solution. An open type cooling model was used in this setup. Temperature was continuously measured by seven thermocouples placed around the borehole. Thermographic scans were also performed during drilling. Results: At the cemented implant surface, the temperature never surpassed 24.7 C when constantly applied internal cooling was used. Without the insulating cement layer (i.e. during drilling of the cementless bone-prosthesis construct), the temperature increased to 47 C. Conclusion: Constantly applied internal cooling can avoid structural bone and soft tissue damage during drilling procedures. With a cement layer, the temperatures only increased to non-damaging levels. The results could be useful in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures with intraprosthetic implant fixation.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Different thermal conductivity in drilling of cemented compared with cementless hip prostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur: an experimental biomechanical analysis. / Brand, Stephan; Klotz, Johannes; Hassel, Thomas et al.
in: International orthopaedics, Jahrgang 37, Nr. 10, 10.2013, S. 1885-1889.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Brand S, Klotz J, Hassel T, Petri M, Ettinger M, Krettek C et al. Different thermal conductivity in drilling of cemented compared with cementless hip prostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur: an experimental biomechanical analysis. International orthopaedics. 2013 Okt;37(10):1885-1889. Epub 2013 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1964-8, 10.1007/s00264-015-2948-7
Download
@article{0d4398936ae14dde867530a6e3961ffa,
title = "Different thermal conductivity in drilling of cemented compared with cementless hip prostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur: an experimental biomechanical analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the different temperature levels whilst drilling cemented and cementless hip prostheses implanted in bovine femora, and to evaluate the insulating function of the cement layer. Methods: Standard hip prostheses were implanted in bovine donor diaphyses, with or without a cement layer. Drilling was then performed using high-performance-cutting drills with a reinforced core, a drilling diameter of 5.5 mm and cooling channels through the tip of the drill for constantly applied internal cooling solution. An open type cooling model was used in this setup. Temperature was continuously measured by seven thermocouples placed around the borehole. Thermographic scans were also performed during drilling. Results: At the cemented implant surface, the temperature never surpassed 24.7 C when constantly applied internal cooling was used. Without the insulating cement layer (i.e. during drilling of the cementless bone-prosthesis construct), the temperature increased to 47 C. Conclusion: Constantly applied internal cooling can avoid structural bone and soft tissue damage during drilling procedures. With a cement layer, the temperatures only increased to non-damaging levels. The results could be useful in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures with intraprosthetic implant fixation.",
author = "Stephan Brand and Johannes Klotz and Thomas Hassel and Maximilian Petri and Max Ettinger and Christian Krettek and Thomas Goesling and Bach, {Friedrich Wilhelm}",
year = "2013",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1007/s00264-013-1964-8",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1885--1889",
journal = "International orthopaedics",
issn = "0341-2695",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "10",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different thermal conductivity in drilling of cemented compared with cementless hip prostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur

T2 - an experimental biomechanical analysis

AU - Brand, Stephan

AU - Klotz, Johannes

AU - Hassel, Thomas

AU - Petri, Maximilian

AU - Ettinger, Max

AU - Krettek, Christian

AU - Goesling, Thomas

AU - Bach, Friedrich Wilhelm

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the different temperature levels whilst drilling cemented and cementless hip prostheses implanted in bovine femora, and to evaluate the insulating function of the cement layer. Methods: Standard hip prostheses were implanted in bovine donor diaphyses, with or without a cement layer. Drilling was then performed using high-performance-cutting drills with a reinforced core, a drilling diameter of 5.5 mm and cooling channels through the tip of the drill for constantly applied internal cooling solution. An open type cooling model was used in this setup. Temperature was continuously measured by seven thermocouples placed around the borehole. Thermographic scans were also performed during drilling. Results: At the cemented implant surface, the temperature never surpassed 24.7 C when constantly applied internal cooling was used. Without the insulating cement layer (i.e. during drilling of the cementless bone-prosthesis construct), the temperature increased to 47 C. Conclusion: Constantly applied internal cooling can avoid structural bone and soft tissue damage during drilling procedures. With a cement layer, the temperatures only increased to non-damaging levels. The results could be useful in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures with intraprosthetic implant fixation.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the different temperature levels whilst drilling cemented and cementless hip prostheses implanted in bovine femora, and to evaluate the insulating function of the cement layer. Methods: Standard hip prostheses were implanted in bovine donor diaphyses, with or without a cement layer. Drilling was then performed using high-performance-cutting drills with a reinforced core, a drilling diameter of 5.5 mm and cooling channels through the tip of the drill for constantly applied internal cooling solution. An open type cooling model was used in this setup. Temperature was continuously measured by seven thermocouples placed around the borehole. Thermographic scans were also performed during drilling. Results: At the cemented implant surface, the temperature never surpassed 24.7 C when constantly applied internal cooling was used. Without the insulating cement layer (i.e. during drilling of the cementless bone-prosthesis construct), the temperature increased to 47 C. Conclusion: Constantly applied internal cooling can avoid structural bone and soft tissue damage during drilling procedures. With a cement layer, the temperatures only increased to non-damaging levels. The results could be useful in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures with intraprosthetic implant fixation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885427658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00264-013-1964-8

DO - 10.1007/s00264-013-1964-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 23775453

AN - SCOPUS:84885427658

VL - 37

SP - 1885

EP - 1889

JO - International orthopaedics

JF - International orthopaedics

SN - 0341-2695

IS - 10

ER -