Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson's disease

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • An Nguyen
  • Nils Roth
  • Nooshin Haji Ghassemi
  • Julius Hannink
  • Thomas Seel
  • Jochen Klucken
  • Heiko Gassner
  • Bjoern M. Eskofier

Externe Organisationen

  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg)
  • Technische Universität Berlin
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer77
FachzeitschriftJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Jahrgang16
Ausgabenummer1
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 26 Juni 2019
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

Background: Gait symptoms and balance impairment are characteristic indicators for the progression in Parkinson's disease (PD). Current gait assessments mostly focus on straight strides with assumed constant velocity, while acceleration/deceleration and turning strides are often ignored. This is either due to the set up of typical clinical assessments or technical limitations in capture volume. Wearable inertial measurement units are a promising and unobtrusive technology to overcome these limitations. Other gait phases such as initiation, termination, transitioning (between straight walking and turning) and turning might be relevant as well for the evaluation of gait and balance impairments in PD. Method: In a cohort of 119 PD patients, we applied unsupervised algorithms to find different gait clusters which potentially include the clinically relevant information from distinct gait phases in the standardized 4x10 m gait test. To clinically validate our approach, we determined the discriminative power in each gait cluster to classify between impaired and unimpaired PD patients and compared it to baseline (analyzing all straight strides). Results: As a main result, analyzing only one of the gait clusters constant, non-constant or turning led in each case to a better classification performance in comparison to the baseline (increase of area under the curve (AUC) up to 19% relative to baseline). Furthermore, gait parameters (for turning, constant and non-constant gait) that best predict motor impairment in PD were identified. Conclusions: We conclude that a more detailed analysis in terms of different gait clusters of standardized gait tests such as the 4x10 m walk may give more insights about the clinically relevant motor impairment in PD patients.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson's disease. / Nguyen, An; Roth, Nils; Ghassemi, Nooshin Haji et al.
in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, Jahrgang 16, Nr. 1, 77, 26.06.2019.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Nguyen A, Roth N, Ghassemi NH, Hannink J, Seel T, Klucken J et al. Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson's disease. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2019 Jun 26;16(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0548-2
Download
@article{704f480c8b1649f69ca87f55732e7aeb,
title = "Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson's disease",
abstract = "Background: Gait symptoms and balance impairment are characteristic indicators for the progression in Parkinson's disease (PD). Current gait assessments mostly focus on straight strides with assumed constant velocity, while acceleration/deceleration and turning strides are often ignored. This is either due to the set up of typical clinical assessments or technical limitations in capture volume. Wearable inertial measurement units are a promising and unobtrusive technology to overcome these limitations. Other gait phases such as initiation, termination, transitioning (between straight walking and turning) and turning might be relevant as well for the evaluation of gait and balance impairments in PD. Method: In a cohort of 119 PD patients, we applied unsupervised algorithms to find different gait clusters which potentially include the clinically relevant information from distinct gait phases in the standardized 4x10 m gait test. To clinically validate our approach, we determined the discriminative power in each gait cluster to classify between impaired and unimpaired PD patients and compared it to baseline (analyzing all straight strides). Results: As a main result, analyzing only one of the gait clusters constant, non-constant or turning led in each case to a better classification performance in comparison to the baseline (increase of area under the curve (AUC) up to 19% relative to baseline). Furthermore, gait parameters (for turning, constant and non-constant gait) that best predict motor impairment in PD were identified. Conclusions: We conclude that a more detailed analysis in terms of different gait clusters of standardized gait tests such as the 4x10 m walk may give more insights about the clinically relevant motor impairment in PD patients.",
keywords = "Accelerometer, Classification, Gait analysis, Gait cluster, Gait phases, Gyroscope, Inertial sensors, Parkinson's disease",
author = "An Nguyen and Nils Roth and Ghassemi, {Nooshin Haji} and Julius Hannink and Thomas Seel and Jochen Klucken and Heiko Gassner and Eskofier, {Bjoern M.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 The Author(s).",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "26",
doi = "10.1186/s12984-019-0548-2",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation",
issn = "1743-0003",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and clinical validation of inertial sensor-based gait-clustering methods in Parkinson's disease

AU - Nguyen, An

AU - Roth, Nils

AU - Ghassemi, Nooshin Haji

AU - Hannink, Julius

AU - Seel, Thomas

AU - Klucken, Jochen

AU - Gassner, Heiko

AU - Eskofier, Bjoern M.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s).

PY - 2019/6/26

Y1 - 2019/6/26

N2 - Background: Gait symptoms and balance impairment are characteristic indicators for the progression in Parkinson's disease (PD). Current gait assessments mostly focus on straight strides with assumed constant velocity, while acceleration/deceleration and turning strides are often ignored. This is either due to the set up of typical clinical assessments or technical limitations in capture volume. Wearable inertial measurement units are a promising and unobtrusive technology to overcome these limitations. Other gait phases such as initiation, termination, transitioning (between straight walking and turning) and turning might be relevant as well for the evaluation of gait and balance impairments in PD. Method: In a cohort of 119 PD patients, we applied unsupervised algorithms to find different gait clusters which potentially include the clinically relevant information from distinct gait phases in the standardized 4x10 m gait test. To clinically validate our approach, we determined the discriminative power in each gait cluster to classify between impaired and unimpaired PD patients and compared it to baseline (analyzing all straight strides). Results: As a main result, analyzing only one of the gait clusters constant, non-constant or turning led in each case to a better classification performance in comparison to the baseline (increase of area under the curve (AUC) up to 19% relative to baseline). Furthermore, gait parameters (for turning, constant and non-constant gait) that best predict motor impairment in PD were identified. Conclusions: We conclude that a more detailed analysis in terms of different gait clusters of standardized gait tests such as the 4x10 m walk may give more insights about the clinically relevant motor impairment in PD patients.

AB - Background: Gait symptoms and balance impairment are characteristic indicators for the progression in Parkinson's disease (PD). Current gait assessments mostly focus on straight strides with assumed constant velocity, while acceleration/deceleration and turning strides are often ignored. This is either due to the set up of typical clinical assessments or technical limitations in capture volume. Wearable inertial measurement units are a promising and unobtrusive technology to overcome these limitations. Other gait phases such as initiation, termination, transitioning (between straight walking and turning) and turning might be relevant as well for the evaluation of gait and balance impairments in PD. Method: In a cohort of 119 PD patients, we applied unsupervised algorithms to find different gait clusters which potentially include the clinically relevant information from distinct gait phases in the standardized 4x10 m gait test. To clinically validate our approach, we determined the discriminative power in each gait cluster to classify between impaired and unimpaired PD patients and compared it to baseline (analyzing all straight strides). Results: As a main result, analyzing only one of the gait clusters constant, non-constant or turning led in each case to a better classification performance in comparison to the baseline (increase of area under the curve (AUC) up to 19% relative to baseline). Furthermore, gait parameters (for turning, constant and non-constant gait) that best predict motor impairment in PD were identified. Conclusions: We conclude that a more detailed analysis in terms of different gait clusters of standardized gait tests such as the 4x10 m walk may give more insights about the clinically relevant motor impairment in PD patients.

KW - Accelerometer

KW - Classification

KW - Gait analysis

KW - Gait cluster

KW - Gait phases

KW - Gyroscope

KW - Inertial sensors

KW - Parkinson's disease

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068840455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12984-019-0548-2

DO - 10.1186/s12984-019-0548-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 31242915

AN - SCOPUS:85068840455

VL - 16

JO - Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

SN - 1743-0003

IS - 1

M1 - 77

ER -

Von denselben Autoren