Deliverable D1.6 Demonstration of Mitigation Measures and Clarification of Unclear Grid Code Requirements

Publikation: Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandProjektbericht/ForschungsberichtForschung

Autoren

  • Sven Rüberg
  • Vinay Sewdien
  • Jose Luis Rueda Torres
  • Elyas Rakhshani
  • Da Wang
  • Bart Tuinema
  • Nakisa Farrokhseresht
  • Digvijay Gusain
  • Arcadio Perilla
  • Jorge Mola Jimenez
  • Carmen Longás Viejo
  • Timo Jens Breithaupt
  • Farshid Goudarzi
  • Karl Robert Meyer
  • Frederik Stallmann
  • Michael Herrmann
  • Lutz Hofmann
  • Axel Mertens
  • Tobias Hennig
  • Marta Val Escudero
  • Jako Kilter
  • Thibault Prevost
  • Guillaume Denis

Externe Organisationen

  • TenneT TSO B.V.
  • Red Eléctrica (Red Eléctrica de España)
  • Amprion GmbH
  • EirGrid PLC
  • Elering AS
  • Réseau de Transport d'Electricité, S.A.
  • Tennet TSO GmbH
  • Delft University of Technology
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seitenumfang172
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 31 Dez. 2019

Abstract

The present document is the final deliverable of work package (WP) 1 of the MIGRATE project. The
focus of this public deliverable is twofold: On the one hand, it provides clarification on selected
requirements from the network code (NC) RfG as well as NC HVDC and gives guidance in terms of
compliance testing against the aforementioned network codes (see chapters 2 and 3) while, on the
other hand, it demonstrates the found specific mitigation measures against power system stability
issues caused by increasing levels of PE penetration using a sufficiently complex test system (see
chapter 4) and concisely summarizes to the public the general key findings of WP1 (see chapter 5).
When the very successful European network codes NC RfG, NC HVDC, and NC DCC were published,
it turned out that some requirements therein were subject to interpretation by the reader.
MIGRATE WP1 conducted a survey among all ENTSO-E TSOs and asked the adopters of these NCs
for unclear requirements that need clarification. Their answers include their unsureness of e.g. how
to interpret “synthetic inertia” and “fast fault current”: What exactly is inertial response, and how
can it be parameterized? How to understand the “fast” in “fast fault current”? Which current (active
or reactive?) is meant, and what shall happen with the other current type during “fast fault current”
contribution? Scientific clarification on these and additional requirements is provided in chapter 2.
Before this background, how to perform a reliable and legally admissable compliance test against
the requirements set in the NCs is another challenge that the European TSOs will be frequently
confronted with in the future. While it is out of scope and resources of the MIGRATE project to
provide an elaborated compliance testing methodology, chapter 3 gives an overview of how
selected EU TSOs have addressed this problem.
The overall goal of MIGRATE WP1 was to identify and quantify power system stability issues that
may arise with increasing levels of PE penetration as well as to provide mitigations measures
against them. The application of these mitigations measures is demonstrated in chapter 4 using a
sufficiently complex power system, i.e. the so-called Irish Test System. It shows to the interested
reader how the proposed mitigation measures can help increasing the PE penetration level in a
realisitic power system and how some mitigations measures interlock in order to ensure global
power system stability.
Using the found mitigation measures, MIGRATE WP1 is confident that it is possible to increase the
PE penetration level in a given power system up to 60 to 70 % in the first stage (fine tuning of
outer control loops of existing PE units) and even further towards 100 % in the second stage
(introduction of grid forming control in some PE units). It is worth mentioning that this
development path (in particular the grid forming control strategy proposed) is compatible with the
finding of MIGRATE WP3 that focused on the operation of a 100-% PE power system.
The general key findings of MIGRATE WP1 are presented in chapter 5 along with references to
corresponding scientific papers that were published by the MIGRATE WP1 researchers for further
reading. It is very difficult to concisely summarize the extensive research work done during the
lifetime of a four-year project. The interested reader is therefore guided to the scientific papers
developed within the MIGRATE framework and invited to contact the MIGRATE WP1 members
anytime he would like to discuss the scientific results with them.

Zitieren

Deliverable D1.6 Demonstration of Mitigation Measures and Clarification of Unclear Grid Code Requirements. / Rüberg, Sven; Sewdien, Vinay; Rueda Torres , Jose Luis et al.
2019. 172 S.

Publikation: Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandProjektbericht/ForschungsberichtForschung

Rüberg, S, Sewdien, V, Rueda Torres , JL, Rakhshani, E, Wang, D, Tuinema, B, Farrokhseresht, N, Gusain, D, Perilla, A, Mola Jimenez, J, Longás Viejo, C, Breithaupt, TJ, Goudarzi, F, Meyer, KR, Stallmann, F, Herrmann, M, Hofmann, L, Mertens, A, Hennig, T, Val Escudero, M, Kilter, J, Prevost, T & Denis, G 2019, Deliverable D1.6 Demonstration of Mitigation Measures and Clarification of Unclear Grid Code Requirements. <https://www.h2020-migrate.eu/_Resources/Persistent/a7e3d4424f6f749e419ddac011419e7a0aa5f576/D1.6%20-%20Demonstration%20of%20Mitigation%20Measures%20and%20Clarification%20of%20Unclear%20Grid%20Code%20Requirements%20-%20final.pdf>
Rüberg, S., Sewdien, V., Rueda Torres , J. L., Rakhshani, E., Wang, D., Tuinema, B., Farrokhseresht, N., Gusain, D., Perilla, A., Mola Jimenez, J., Longás Viejo, C., Breithaupt, T. J., Goudarzi, F., Meyer, K. R., Stallmann, F., Herrmann, M., Hofmann, L., Mertens, A., Hennig, T., ... Denis, G. (2019). Deliverable D1.6 Demonstration of Mitigation Measures and Clarification of Unclear Grid Code Requirements. https://www.h2020-migrate.eu/_Resources/Persistent/a7e3d4424f6f749e419ddac011419e7a0aa5f576/D1.6%20-%20Demonstration%20of%20Mitigation%20Measures%20and%20Clarification%20of%20Unclear%20Grid%20Code%20Requirements%20-%20final.pdf
Rüberg S, Sewdien V, Rueda Torres JL, Rakhshani E, Wang D, Tuinema B et al. Deliverable D1.6 Demonstration of Mitigation Measures and Clarification of Unclear Grid Code Requirements. 2019. 172 S.
Rüberg, Sven ; Sewdien, Vinay ; Rueda Torres , Jose Luis et al. / Deliverable D1.6 Demonstration of Mitigation Measures and Clarification of Unclear Grid Code Requirements. 2019. 172 S.
Download
@book{2802129c369b4fd8a0d85773807a7a57,
title = "Deliverable D1.6 Demonstration of Mitigation Measures and Clarification of Unclear Grid Code Requirements",
abstract = "The present document is the final deliverable of work package (WP) 1 of the MIGRATE project. Thefocus of this public deliverable is twofold: On the one hand, it provides clarification on selectedrequirements from the network code (NC) RfG as well as NC HVDC and gives guidance in terms ofcompliance testing against the aforementioned network codes (see chapters 2 and 3) while, on theother hand, it demonstrates the found specific mitigation measures against power system stabilityissues caused by increasing levels of PE penetration using a sufficiently complex test system (seechapter 4) and concisely summarizes to the public the general key findings of WP1 (see chapter 5).When the very successful European network codes NC RfG, NC HVDC, and NC DCC were published,it turned out that some requirements therein were subject to interpretation by the reader.MIGRATE WP1 conducted a survey among all ENTSO-E TSOs and asked the adopters of these NCsfor unclear requirements that need clarification. Their answers include their unsureness of e.g. howto interpret “synthetic inertia” and “fast fault current”: What exactly is inertial response, and howcan it be parameterized? How to understand the “fast” in “fast fault current”? Which current (activeor reactive?) is meant, and what shall happen with the other current type during “fast fault current”contribution? Scientific clarification on these and additional requirements is provided in chapter 2.Before this background, how to perform a reliable and legally admissable compliance test againstthe requirements set in the NCs is another challenge that the European TSOs will be frequentlyconfronted with in the future. While it is out of scope and resources of the MIGRATE project toprovide an elaborated compliance testing methodology, chapter 3 gives an overview of howselected EU TSOs have addressed this problem.The overall goal of MIGRATE WP1 was to identify and quantify power system stability issues thatmay arise with increasing levels of PE penetration as well as to provide mitigations measuresagainst them. The application of these mitigations measures is demonstrated in chapter 4 using asufficiently complex power system, i.e. the so-called Irish Test System. It shows to the interestedreader how the proposed mitigation measures can help increasing the PE penetration level in arealisitic power system and how some mitigations measures interlock in order to ensure globalpower system stability.Using the found mitigation measures, MIGRATE WP1 is confident that it is possible to increase thePE penetration level in a given power system up to 60 to 70 % in the first stage (fine tuning ofouter control loops of existing PE units) and even further towards 100 % in the second stage(introduction of grid forming control in some PE units). It is worth mentioning that thisdevelopment path (in particular the grid forming control strategy proposed) is compatible with thefinding of MIGRATE WP3 that focused on the operation of a 100-% PE power system.The general key findings of MIGRATE WP1 are presented in chapter 5 along with references tocorresponding scientific papers that were published by the MIGRATE WP1 researchers for furtherreading. It is very difficult to concisely summarize the extensive research work done during thelifetime of a four-year project. The interested reader is therefore guided to the scientific papersdeveloped within the MIGRATE framework and invited to contact the MIGRATE WP1 membersanytime he would like to discuss the scientific results with them.",
author = "Sven R{\"u}berg and Vinay Sewdien and {Rueda Torres}, {Jose Luis} and Elyas Rakhshani and Da Wang and Bart Tuinema and Nakisa Farrokhseresht and Digvijay Gusain and Arcadio Perilla and {Mola Jimenez}, Jorge and {Long{\'a}s Viejo}, Carmen and Breithaupt, {Timo Jens} and Farshid Goudarzi and Meyer, {Karl Robert} and Frederik Stallmann and Michael Herrmann and Lutz Hofmann and Axel Mertens and Tobias Hennig and {Val Escudero}, Marta and Jako Kilter and Thibault Prevost and Guillaume Denis",
year = "2019",
month = dec,
day = "31",
language = "English",

}

Download

TY - BOOK

T1 - Deliverable D1.6 Demonstration of Mitigation Measures and Clarification of Unclear Grid Code Requirements

AU - Rüberg, Sven

AU - Sewdien, Vinay

AU - Rueda Torres , Jose Luis

AU - Rakhshani, Elyas

AU - Wang, Da

AU - Tuinema, Bart

AU - Farrokhseresht, Nakisa

AU - Gusain, Digvijay

AU - Perilla, Arcadio

AU - Mola Jimenez, Jorge

AU - Longás Viejo, Carmen

AU - Breithaupt, Timo Jens

AU - Goudarzi, Farshid

AU - Meyer, Karl Robert

AU - Stallmann, Frederik

AU - Herrmann, Michael

AU - Hofmann, Lutz

AU - Mertens, Axel

AU - Hennig, Tobias

AU - Val Escudero, Marta

AU - Kilter, Jako

AU - Prevost, Thibault

AU - Denis, Guillaume

PY - 2019/12/31

Y1 - 2019/12/31

N2 - The present document is the final deliverable of work package (WP) 1 of the MIGRATE project. Thefocus of this public deliverable is twofold: On the one hand, it provides clarification on selectedrequirements from the network code (NC) RfG as well as NC HVDC and gives guidance in terms ofcompliance testing against the aforementioned network codes (see chapters 2 and 3) while, on theother hand, it demonstrates the found specific mitigation measures against power system stabilityissues caused by increasing levels of PE penetration using a sufficiently complex test system (seechapter 4) and concisely summarizes to the public the general key findings of WP1 (see chapter 5).When the very successful European network codes NC RfG, NC HVDC, and NC DCC were published,it turned out that some requirements therein were subject to interpretation by the reader.MIGRATE WP1 conducted a survey among all ENTSO-E TSOs and asked the adopters of these NCsfor unclear requirements that need clarification. Their answers include their unsureness of e.g. howto interpret “synthetic inertia” and “fast fault current”: What exactly is inertial response, and howcan it be parameterized? How to understand the “fast” in “fast fault current”? Which current (activeor reactive?) is meant, and what shall happen with the other current type during “fast fault current”contribution? Scientific clarification on these and additional requirements is provided in chapter 2.Before this background, how to perform a reliable and legally admissable compliance test againstthe requirements set in the NCs is another challenge that the European TSOs will be frequentlyconfronted with in the future. While it is out of scope and resources of the MIGRATE project toprovide an elaborated compliance testing methodology, chapter 3 gives an overview of howselected EU TSOs have addressed this problem.The overall goal of MIGRATE WP1 was to identify and quantify power system stability issues thatmay arise with increasing levels of PE penetration as well as to provide mitigations measuresagainst them. The application of these mitigations measures is demonstrated in chapter 4 using asufficiently complex power system, i.e. the so-called Irish Test System. It shows to the interestedreader how the proposed mitigation measures can help increasing the PE penetration level in arealisitic power system and how some mitigations measures interlock in order to ensure globalpower system stability.Using the found mitigation measures, MIGRATE WP1 is confident that it is possible to increase thePE penetration level in a given power system up to 60 to 70 % in the first stage (fine tuning ofouter control loops of existing PE units) and even further towards 100 % in the second stage(introduction of grid forming control in some PE units). It is worth mentioning that thisdevelopment path (in particular the grid forming control strategy proposed) is compatible with thefinding of MIGRATE WP3 that focused on the operation of a 100-% PE power system.The general key findings of MIGRATE WP1 are presented in chapter 5 along with references tocorresponding scientific papers that were published by the MIGRATE WP1 researchers for furtherreading. It is very difficult to concisely summarize the extensive research work done during thelifetime of a four-year project. The interested reader is therefore guided to the scientific papersdeveloped within the MIGRATE framework and invited to contact the MIGRATE WP1 membersanytime he would like to discuss the scientific results with them.

AB - The present document is the final deliverable of work package (WP) 1 of the MIGRATE project. Thefocus of this public deliverable is twofold: On the one hand, it provides clarification on selectedrequirements from the network code (NC) RfG as well as NC HVDC and gives guidance in terms ofcompliance testing against the aforementioned network codes (see chapters 2 and 3) while, on theother hand, it demonstrates the found specific mitigation measures against power system stabilityissues caused by increasing levels of PE penetration using a sufficiently complex test system (seechapter 4) and concisely summarizes to the public the general key findings of WP1 (see chapter 5).When the very successful European network codes NC RfG, NC HVDC, and NC DCC were published,it turned out that some requirements therein were subject to interpretation by the reader.MIGRATE WP1 conducted a survey among all ENTSO-E TSOs and asked the adopters of these NCsfor unclear requirements that need clarification. Their answers include their unsureness of e.g. howto interpret “synthetic inertia” and “fast fault current”: What exactly is inertial response, and howcan it be parameterized? How to understand the “fast” in “fast fault current”? Which current (activeor reactive?) is meant, and what shall happen with the other current type during “fast fault current”contribution? Scientific clarification on these and additional requirements is provided in chapter 2.Before this background, how to perform a reliable and legally admissable compliance test againstthe requirements set in the NCs is another challenge that the European TSOs will be frequentlyconfronted with in the future. While it is out of scope and resources of the MIGRATE project toprovide an elaborated compliance testing methodology, chapter 3 gives an overview of howselected EU TSOs have addressed this problem.The overall goal of MIGRATE WP1 was to identify and quantify power system stability issues thatmay arise with increasing levels of PE penetration as well as to provide mitigations measuresagainst them. The application of these mitigations measures is demonstrated in chapter 4 using asufficiently complex power system, i.e. the so-called Irish Test System. It shows to the interestedreader how the proposed mitigation measures can help increasing the PE penetration level in arealisitic power system and how some mitigations measures interlock in order to ensure globalpower system stability.Using the found mitigation measures, MIGRATE WP1 is confident that it is possible to increase thePE penetration level in a given power system up to 60 to 70 % in the first stage (fine tuning ofouter control loops of existing PE units) and even further towards 100 % in the second stage(introduction of grid forming control in some PE units). It is worth mentioning that thisdevelopment path (in particular the grid forming control strategy proposed) is compatible with thefinding of MIGRATE WP3 that focused on the operation of a 100-% PE power system.The general key findings of MIGRATE WP1 are presented in chapter 5 along with references tocorresponding scientific papers that were published by the MIGRATE WP1 researchers for furtherreading. It is very difficult to concisely summarize the extensive research work done during thelifetime of a four-year project. The interested reader is therefore guided to the scientific papersdeveloped within the MIGRATE framework and invited to contact the MIGRATE WP1 membersanytime he would like to discuss the scientific results with them.

M3 - Project report/research report

BT - Deliverable D1.6 Demonstration of Mitigation Measures and Clarification of Unclear Grid Code Requirements

ER -

Von denselben Autoren