Cu isotope fractionation between Cu-bearing phases and hydrothermal fluids: Insights from ex situ and in situ experiments

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

Externe Organisationen

  • Northwest University China
  • Xinjiang University
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1320–1336
Seitenumfang17
FachzeitschriftAmerican mineralogist
Jahrgang109
Ausgabenummer8
Frühes Online-Datum1 Aug. 2024
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Aug. 2024

Abstract

Cu isotope ratios have been widely applied to fingerprinting metal sources, tracking fluid pathways, and tracing mineralization processes, for which knowledge of isotope fractionation is required. This paper presents new experimental calibration data of Cu isotope fractionation between Cu-bearing minerals (native Cu and cuprite) and Cl-bearing hydrothermal fluids at 25–800 °C and 0.1–200 MPa. The experiments were performed either using a polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) beaker on a hotplate, a rapid heat/rapid quench argon cold seal pressure vessel (RH/RQ Ar-CSPV), or a large volume fluid reactor, which enabled fluid sampling ex situ (the former two) and in situ (the latter). Three setups were designed to investigate Cu isotope fractionation (Δ 65Cu fluid-mineral): (1) associated with Cu(I) dissolution, Cu(I) disproportionation as well as oxidation of Cu(0) (native copper) and Cu(I) in Cu ± Cu 2O + HCl systems at temperatures of up to 800 °C and pressures of up to 200 MPa; (2) related to Cu-Au alloying processes in the Cu + NaCl/HCl system at 600 °C and 150 MPa; (3) to evaluate the influences of different sampling techniques (ex situ vs. in situ) and superimposed cooling processes. The selected system is Cu 2O + NaCl + 0.2 m HAc/NaAc (pH-buffer), and runs were conducted at 200–250 °C and 20 MPa. Δ 65Cu fluid-mineral shows the least variation during solid separation from source fluids, generally <0.16 ± 0.03%. Positive Δ 65Cu fluid-mineral values are found in most runs, excluding cuprite dissolution in NaCl/ HCl solutions at 200–250 °C, 20 MPa, and 800 °C, 200 MPa. Cu oxidative leaching into Cu(I) results in decreasing Δ 65Cu Cu(I)-Cu(0) values from 0.12 ± 0.05% to 0.07 ± 0.05%, and –0.30 ± 0.03% at 25, 50, and 200 °C, respectively. In contrast, Cu dissolution at high temperatures (600–800 °C) leads to Cu(I)-containing quench fluids and subsequent native Cu precipitates. Both products are enriched in heavy isotopes by up to 5%, caused by preferential enrichment of 65Cu at the surface layer during the alloying-induced diffusion transport process. Cuprite oxidative leaching in HCl leads to fluids enriched in Cu(II), and the corresponding Δ 65Cu Cu(II)-Cu(I) increases from 0.52 ± 0.04% at 25 °C to 0.89 ± 0.02% at 50 °C. Fluids are enriched with light isotopes ( 63Cu) during cuprite dissolution at 200, 250, and 800 °C, i.e., 0–0.55 ± 0.04% lower than the precursor. At 250–300 °C, Cu(I) disproportionation into Cu(II) and Cu(0) dominates the observed isotope fractionation, yielding Δ 65Cu fluid-Cu2O up to 0.59 ± 0.03% and Δ 65Cu Cu(0)-Cu2O up to –0.28 ± 0.02%. Rapid cooling (3–25 K s –1) relative to slow cooling (0.014 K s –1) can cause phase separation as well as significant isotope fractionation, particularly if fluids cool from an intermediate high temperature to ambient temperature (e.g., from 200–300 to 25 °C), which highlights the importance of kinetic processes that may potentially alter the isotope composition of natural ore-forming fluids.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Cu isotope fractionation between Cu-bearing phases and hydrothermal fluids: Insights from ex situ and in situ experiments. / Qi, Dongmei; Zhang, Chao; Lazarov, Marina.
in: American mineralogist, Jahrgang 109, Nr. 8, 08.2024, S. 1320–1336.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{fda2194cad85419ca066af567b1243e5,
title = "Cu isotope fractionation between Cu-bearing phases and hydrothermal fluids: Insights from ex situ and in situ experiments",
abstract = "Cu isotope ratios have been widely applied to fingerprinting metal sources, tracking fluid pathways, and tracing mineralization processes, for which knowledge of isotope fractionation is required. This paper presents new experimental calibration data of Cu isotope fractionation between Cu-bearing minerals (native Cu and cuprite) and Cl-bearing hydrothermal fluids at 25–800 °C and 0.1–200 MPa. The experiments were performed either using a polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) beaker on a hotplate, a rapid heat/rapid quench argon cold seal pressure vessel (RH/RQ Ar-CSPV), or a large volume fluid reactor, which enabled fluid sampling ex situ (the former two) and in situ (the latter). Three setups were designed to investigate Cu isotope fractionation (Δ 65Cu fluid-mineral): (1) associated with Cu(I) dissolution, Cu(I) disproportionation as well as oxidation of Cu(0) (native copper) and Cu(I) in Cu ± Cu 2O + HCl systems at temperatures of up to 800 °C and pressures of up to 200 MPa; (2) related to Cu-Au alloying processes in the Cu + NaCl/HCl system at 600 °C and 150 MPa; (3) to evaluate the influences of different sampling techniques (ex situ vs. in situ) and superimposed cooling processes. The selected system is Cu 2O + NaCl + 0.2 m HAc/NaAc (pH-buffer), and runs were conducted at 200–250 °C and 20 MPa. Δ 65Cu fluid-mineral shows the least variation during solid separation from source fluids, generally <0.16 ± 0.03%. Positive Δ 65Cu fluid-mineral values are found in most runs, excluding cuprite dissolution in NaCl/ HCl solutions at 200–250 °C, 20 MPa, and 800 °C, 200 MPa. Cu oxidative leaching into Cu(I) results in decreasing Δ 65Cu Cu(I)-Cu(0) values from 0.12 ± 0.05% to 0.07 ± 0.05%, and –0.30 ± 0.03% at 25, 50, and 200 °C, respectively. In contrast, Cu dissolution at high temperatures (600–800 °C) leads to Cu(I)-containing quench fluids and subsequent native Cu precipitates. Both products are enriched in heavy isotopes by up to 5%, caused by preferential enrichment of 65Cu at the surface layer during the alloying-induced diffusion transport process. Cuprite oxidative leaching in HCl leads to fluids enriched in Cu(II), and the corresponding Δ 65Cu Cu(II)-Cu(I) increases from 0.52 ± 0.04% at 25 °C to 0.89 ± 0.02% at 50 °C. Fluids are enriched with light isotopes ( 63Cu) during cuprite dissolution at 200, 250, and 800 °C, i.e., 0–0.55 ± 0.04% lower than the precursor. At 250–300 °C, Cu(I) disproportionation into Cu(II) and Cu(0) dominates the observed isotope fractionation, yielding Δ 65Cu fluid-Cu2O up to 0.59 ± 0.03% and Δ 65Cu Cu(0)-Cu2O up to –0.28 ± 0.02%. Rapid cooling (3–25 K s –1) relative to slow cooling (0.014 K s –1) can cause phase separation as well as significant isotope fractionation, particularly if fluids cool from an intermediate high temperature to ambient temperature (e.g., from 200–300 to 25 °C), which highlights the importance of kinetic processes that may potentially alter the isotope composition of natural ore-forming fluids.",
keywords = "Cu isotope fractionation, Cu-Au alloying, Isotopes, Minerals, and Petrology: Honoring John Valley, cooling, diffusion, in situ fluid sampling, redox reaction",
author = "Dongmei Qi and Chao Zhang and Marina Lazarov",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.",
year = "2024",
month = aug,
doi = "10.2138/am-2023-9155",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "1320–1336",
journal = "American mineralogist",
issn = "0003-004X",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "8",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cu isotope fractionation between Cu-bearing phases and hydrothermal fluids

T2 - Insights from ex situ and in situ experiments

AU - Qi, Dongmei

AU - Zhang, Chao

AU - Lazarov, Marina

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH. All rights reserved.

PY - 2024/8

Y1 - 2024/8

N2 - Cu isotope ratios have been widely applied to fingerprinting metal sources, tracking fluid pathways, and tracing mineralization processes, for which knowledge of isotope fractionation is required. This paper presents new experimental calibration data of Cu isotope fractionation between Cu-bearing minerals (native Cu and cuprite) and Cl-bearing hydrothermal fluids at 25–800 °C and 0.1–200 MPa. The experiments were performed either using a polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) beaker on a hotplate, a rapid heat/rapid quench argon cold seal pressure vessel (RH/RQ Ar-CSPV), or a large volume fluid reactor, which enabled fluid sampling ex situ (the former two) and in situ (the latter). Three setups were designed to investigate Cu isotope fractionation (Δ 65Cu fluid-mineral): (1) associated with Cu(I) dissolution, Cu(I) disproportionation as well as oxidation of Cu(0) (native copper) and Cu(I) in Cu ± Cu 2O + HCl systems at temperatures of up to 800 °C and pressures of up to 200 MPa; (2) related to Cu-Au alloying processes in the Cu + NaCl/HCl system at 600 °C and 150 MPa; (3) to evaluate the influences of different sampling techniques (ex situ vs. in situ) and superimposed cooling processes. The selected system is Cu 2O + NaCl + 0.2 m HAc/NaAc (pH-buffer), and runs were conducted at 200–250 °C and 20 MPa. Δ 65Cu fluid-mineral shows the least variation during solid separation from source fluids, generally <0.16 ± 0.03%. Positive Δ 65Cu fluid-mineral values are found in most runs, excluding cuprite dissolution in NaCl/ HCl solutions at 200–250 °C, 20 MPa, and 800 °C, 200 MPa. Cu oxidative leaching into Cu(I) results in decreasing Δ 65Cu Cu(I)-Cu(0) values from 0.12 ± 0.05% to 0.07 ± 0.05%, and –0.30 ± 0.03% at 25, 50, and 200 °C, respectively. In contrast, Cu dissolution at high temperatures (600–800 °C) leads to Cu(I)-containing quench fluids and subsequent native Cu precipitates. Both products are enriched in heavy isotopes by up to 5%, caused by preferential enrichment of 65Cu at the surface layer during the alloying-induced diffusion transport process. Cuprite oxidative leaching in HCl leads to fluids enriched in Cu(II), and the corresponding Δ 65Cu Cu(II)-Cu(I) increases from 0.52 ± 0.04% at 25 °C to 0.89 ± 0.02% at 50 °C. Fluids are enriched with light isotopes ( 63Cu) during cuprite dissolution at 200, 250, and 800 °C, i.e., 0–0.55 ± 0.04% lower than the precursor. At 250–300 °C, Cu(I) disproportionation into Cu(II) and Cu(0) dominates the observed isotope fractionation, yielding Δ 65Cu fluid-Cu2O up to 0.59 ± 0.03% and Δ 65Cu Cu(0)-Cu2O up to –0.28 ± 0.02%. Rapid cooling (3–25 K s –1) relative to slow cooling (0.014 K s –1) can cause phase separation as well as significant isotope fractionation, particularly if fluids cool from an intermediate high temperature to ambient temperature (e.g., from 200–300 to 25 °C), which highlights the importance of kinetic processes that may potentially alter the isotope composition of natural ore-forming fluids.

AB - Cu isotope ratios have been widely applied to fingerprinting metal sources, tracking fluid pathways, and tracing mineralization processes, for which knowledge of isotope fractionation is required. This paper presents new experimental calibration data of Cu isotope fractionation between Cu-bearing minerals (native Cu and cuprite) and Cl-bearing hydrothermal fluids at 25–800 °C and 0.1–200 MPa. The experiments were performed either using a polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) beaker on a hotplate, a rapid heat/rapid quench argon cold seal pressure vessel (RH/RQ Ar-CSPV), or a large volume fluid reactor, which enabled fluid sampling ex situ (the former two) and in situ (the latter). Three setups were designed to investigate Cu isotope fractionation (Δ 65Cu fluid-mineral): (1) associated with Cu(I) dissolution, Cu(I) disproportionation as well as oxidation of Cu(0) (native copper) and Cu(I) in Cu ± Cu 2O + HCl systems at temperatures of up to 800 °C and pressures of up to 200 MPa; (2) related to Cu-Au alloying processes in the Cu + NaCl/HCl system at 600 °C and 150 MPa; (3) to evaluate the influences of different sampling techniques (ex situ vs. in situ) and superimposed cooling processes. The selected system is Cu 2O + NaCl + 0.2 m HAc/NaAc (pH-buffer), and runs were conducted at 200–250 °C and 20 MPa. Δ 65Cu fluid-mineral shows the least variation during solid separation from source fluids, generally <0.16 ± 0.03%. Positive Δ 65Cu fluid-mineral values are found in most runs, excluding cuprite dissolution in NaCl/ HCl solutions at 200–250 °C, 20 MPa, and 800 °C, 200 MPa. Cu oxidative leaching into Cu(I) results in decreasing Δ 65Cu Cu(I)-Cu(0) values from 0.12 ± 0.05% to 0.07 ± 0.05%, and –0.30 ± 0.03% at 25, 50, and 200 °C, respectively. In contrast, Cu dissolution at high temperatures (600–800 °C) leads to Cu(I)-containing quench fluids and subsequent native Cu precipitates. Both products are enriched in heavy isotopes by up to 5%, caused by preferential enrichment of 65Cu at the surface layer during the alloying-induced diffusion transport process. Cuprite oxidative leaching in HCl leads to fluids enriched in Cu(II), and the corresponding Δ 65Cu Cu(II)-Cu(I) increases from 0.52 ± 0.04% at 25 °C to 0.89 ± 0.02% at 50 °C. Fluids are enriched with light isotopes ( 63Cu) during cuprite dissolution at 200, 250, and 800 °C, i.e., 0–0.55 ± 0.04% lower than the precursor. At 250–300 °C, Cu(I) disproportionation into Cu(II) and Cu(0) dominates the observed isotope fractionation, yielding Δ 65Cu fluid-Cu2O up to 0.59 ± 0.03% and Δ 65Cu Cu(0)-Cu2O up to –0.28 ± 0.02%. Rapid cooling (3–25 K s –1) relative to slow cooling (0.014 K s –1) can cause phase separation as well as significant isotope fractionation, particularly if fluids cool from an intermediate high temperature to ambient temperature (e.g., from 200–300 to 25 °C), which highlights the importance of kinetic processes that may potentially alter the isotope composition of natural ore-forming fluids.

KW - Cu isotope fractionation

KW - Cu-Au alloying

KW - Isotopes

KW - Minerals, and Petrology: Honoring John Valley

KW - cooling

KW - diffusion

KW - in situ fluid sampling

KW - redox reaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188598513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2138/am-2023-9155

DO - 10.2138/am-2023-9155

M3 - Article

VL - 109

SP - 1320

EP - 1336

JO - American mineralogist

JF - American mineralogist

SN - 0003-004X

IS - 8

ER -

Von denselben Autoren