Cross-Domain Mining of Argumentative Text through Distant Supervision

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

Externe Organisationen

  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksProceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
UntertitelHuman Language Technologies
Seiten1395-1404
Seitenumfang10
ISBN (elektronisch)9781941643914
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Juni 2016
Extern publiziertJa
Veranstaltung15th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL HLT 2016 - San Diego, USA / Vereinigte Staaten
Dauer: 12 Juni 201617 Juni 2016

Abstract

Argumentation mining is considered as a key technology for future search engines and automated decision making. In such applications, argumentative text segments have to be mined from large and diverse document collections. However, most existing argumentation mining approaches tackle the classification of argumentativeness only for a few manually annotated documents from narrow domains and registers. This limits their practical applicability. We hence propose a distant supervision approach that acquires argumentative text segments automatically from online debate portals. Experiments across domains and registers show that training on such a corpus improves the effectiveness and robustness of mining argumentative text. We freely provide the underlying corpus for research.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Cross-Domain Mining of Argumentative Text through Distant Supervision. / Al-Khatib, Khalid; Wachsmuth, Henning; Hagen, Matthias et al.
Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2016. S. 1395-1404.

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Al-Khatib, K, Wachsmuth, H, Hagen, M, Köhler, J & Stein, B 2016, Cross-Domain Mining of Argumentative Text through Distant Supervision. in Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. S. 1395-1404, 15th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL HLT 2016, San Diego, USA / Vereinigte Staaten, 12 Juni 2016. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n16-1165
Al-Khatib, K., Wachsmuth, H., Hagen, M., Köhler, J., & Stein, B. (2016). Cross-Domain Mining of Argumentative Text through Distant Supervision. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (S. 1395-1404) https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n16-1165
Al-Khatib K, Wachsmuth H, Hagen M, Köhler J, Stein B. Cross-Domain Mining of Argumentative Text through Distant Supervision. in Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2016. S. 1395-1404 doi: 10.18653/v1/n16-1165
Al-Khatib, Khalid ; Wachsmuth, Henning ; Hagen, Matthias et al. / Cross-Domain Mining of Argumentative Text through Distant Supervision. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2016. S. 1395-1404
Download
@inproceedings{5e48efcdbc3d4434960957e6e9f3c164,
title = "Cross-Domain Mining of Argumentative Text through Distant Supervision",
abstract = "Argumentation mining is considered as a key technology for future search engines and automated decision making. In such applications, argumentative text segments have to be mined from large and diverse document collections. However, most existing argumentation mining approaches tackle the classification of argumentativeness only for a few manually annotated documents from narrow domains and registers. This limits their practical applicability. We hence propose a distant supervision approach that acquires argumentative text segments automatically from online debate portals. Experiments across domains and registers show that training on such a corpus improves the effectiveness and robustness of mining argumentative text. We freely provide the underlying corpus for research.",
author = "Khalid Al-Khatib and Henning Wachsmuth and Matthias Hagen and Jonas K{\"o}hler and Benno Stein",
year = "2016",
month = jun,
doi = "10.18653/v1/n16-1165",
language = "English",
pages = "1395--1404",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
note = "15th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL HLT 2016 ; Conference date: 12-06-2016 Through 17-06-2016",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Cross-Domain Mining of Argumentative Text through Distant Supervision

AU - Al-Khatib, Khalid

AU - Wachsmuth, Henning

AU - Hagen, Matthias

AU - Köhler, Jonas

AU - Stein, Benno

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - Argumentation mining is considered as a key technology for future search engines and automated decision making. In such applications, argumentative text segments have to be mined from large and diverse document collections. However, most existing argumentation mining approaches tackle the classification of argumentativeness only for a few manually annotated documents from narrow domains and registers. This limits their practical applicability. We hence propose a distant supervision approach that acquires argumentative text segments automatically from online debate portals. Experiments across domains and registers show that training on such a corpus improves the effectiveness and robustness of mining argumentative text. We freely provide the underlying corpus for research.

AB - Argumentation mining is considered as a key technology for future search engines and automated decision making. In such applications, argumentative text segments have to be mined from large and diverse document collections. However, most existing argumentation mining approaches tackle the classification of argumentativeness only for a few manually annotated documents from narrow domains and registers. This limits their practical applicability. We hence propose a distant supervision approach that acquires argumentative text segments automatically from online debate portals. Experiments across domains and registers show that training on such a corpus improves the effectiveness and robustness of mining argumentative text. We freely provide the underlying corpus for research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994152079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18653/v1/n16-1165

DO - 10.18653/v1/n16-1165

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84994152079

SP - 1395

EP - 1404

BT - Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics

T2 - 15th Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL HLT 2016

Y2 - 12 June 2016 through 17 June 2016

ER -

Von denselben Autoren