Critica del diritto, topica ed ermeneutica nell’era digitale: Giambattista Vico e Friedrich Carl von Savigny

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Stephan Meder
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

Titel in ÜbersetzungTopical and Hermeneutical Law Critique in the Digital Era: Giambattista Vico and Friedrich Carl von Savigny
OriginalspracheItalienisch
Seiten (von - bis)73-88
Seitenumfang16
FachzeitschriftArs Interpretandi
Jahrgang26
Ausgabenummer2
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Juli 2021

Abstract

The final decision of cases is often not possible on the basis of existing legal norms. It is not uncommon for questions to be raised for which there is more than one legal answer. Vico and Savigny devote particular attention to this subject. However, their high regard for common law should not be misunderstood as advocating judgement unfettered from legal norms. On the contrary, their great respect for the doctrine of legislation must lead to a decisive rejection of justice dispensed on the basis of equity or Qadi principles. The ultimate solution is the ideal union between adherence to the letter of the law and creative jurisprudence, between respect for general rules and consideration for the special circumstances of each individual case, which Savigny called “tact” and Vico called “widsom”.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

  • Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
  • Recht

Zitieren

Critica del diritto, topica ed ermeneutica nell’era digitale: Giambattista Vico e Friedrich Carl von Savigny. / Meder, Stephan.
in: Ars Interpretandi, Jahrgang 26, Nr. 2, 01.07.2021, S. 73-88.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Meder, Stephan. / Critica del diritto, topica ed ermeneutica nell’era digitale : Giambattista Vico e Friedrich Carl von Savigny. in: Ars Interpretandi. 2021 ; Jahrgang 26, Nr. 2. S. 73-88.
Download
@article{d3c4f3a3214f4f7280b1496c336cb7d1,
title = "Critica del diritto, topica ed ermeneutica nell{\textquoteright}era digitale: Giambattista Vico e Friedrich Carl von Savigny",
abstract = "The final decision of cases is often not possible on the basis of existing legal norms. It is not uncommon for questions to be raised for which there is more than one legal answer. Vico and Savigny devote particular attention to this subject. However, their high regard for common law should not be misunderstood as advocating judgement unfettered from legal norms. On the contrary, their great respect for the doctrine of legislation must lead to a decisive rejection of justice dispensed on the basis of equity or Qadi principles. The ultimate solution is the ideal union between adherence to the letter of the law and creative jurisprudence, between respect for general rules and consideration for the special circumstances of each individual case, which Savigny called “tact” and Vico called “widsom”.",
keywords = "Artificial Intelligence, Hermeneutics, Historical School of German Jurisprudence, Mos Geometricus, Topoi",
author = "Stephan Meder",
year = "2021",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.7382/102562",
language = "Italian",
volume = "26",
pages = "73--88",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critica del diritto, topica ed ermeneutica nell’era digitale

T2 - Giambattista Vico e Friedrich Carl von Savigny

AU - Meder, Stephan

PY - 2021/7/1

Y1 - 2021/7/1

N2 - The final decision of cases is often not possible on the basis of existing legal norms. It is not uncommon for questions to be raised for which there is more than one legal answer. Vico and Savigny devote particular attention to this subject. However, their high regard for common law should not be misunderstood as advocating judgement unfettered from legal norms. On the contrary, their great respect for the doctrine of legislation must lead to a decisive rejection of justice dispensed on the basis of equity or Qadi principles. The ultimate solution is the ideal union between adherence to the letter of the law and creative jurisprudence, between respect for general rules and consideration for the special circumstances of each individual case, which Savigny called “tact” and Vico called “widsom”.

AB - The final decision of cases is often not possible on the basis of existing legal norms. It is not uncommon for questions to be raised for which there is more than one legal answer. Vico and Savigny devote particular attention to this subject. However, their high regard for common law should not be misunderstood as advocating judgement unfettered from legal norms. On the contrary, their great respect for the doctrine of legislation must lead to a decisive rejection of justice dispensed on the basis of equity or Qadi principles. The ultimate solution is the ideal union between adherence to the letter of the law and creative jurisprudence, between respect for general rules and consideration for the special circumstances of each individual case, which Savigny called “tact” and Vico called “widsom”.

KW - Artificial Intelligence

KW - Hermeneutics

KW - Historical School of German Jurisprudence

KW - Mos Geometricus

KW - Topoi

U2 - 10.7382/102562

DO - 10.7382/102562

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85132606325

VL - 26

SP - 73

EP - 88

JO - Ars Interpretandi

JF - Ars Interpretandi

SN - 1722-8352

IS - 2

ER -