Corporate Reputation Management in Germany: Results of an Empirical Study

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Klaus Peter Wiedmann
  • Holger Buxel

Externe Organisationen

  • Strategy and Marketing Institute GmbH
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)145-163
Seitenumfang19
FachzeitschriftCorporate Reputation Review
Jahrgang8
Ausgabenummer2
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Juli 2005

Abstract

Corporate reputation radiates a strong appeal — it helps companies to obtain good employees, makes customer acquisition easier, increases customer loyalty, can be implemented as a competitive performance factor, and is more than helpful for the procurement of capital, not lastly if a company is listed on the stock exchange. The broad spectrum of potential for opportunity however, cannot be purposefully exhausted without rigorous reputation management. This is why professional corporate reputation management is of pivotal importance. Yet how is yield-oriented reputation management implemented successfully? What objectives, measures and controlling instruments do companies consider to be promising and important? Up to now there has been a lack of sound research which examines the state of the art in corporate practice and which supplies insight into the potential for and evaluation of success in individual instrumental areas. The results presented here of a representative study on the subject of ‘Corporate Reputation Management in Germany’ throw light on and evaluate the current state of reputation management in Germany.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Corporate Reputation Management in Germany: Results of an Empirical Study. / Wiedmann, Klaus Peter; Buxel, Holger.
in: Corporate Reputation Review, Jahrgang 8, Nr. 2, 01.07.2005, S. 145-163.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Wiedmann, KP & Buxel, H 2005, 'Corporate Reputation Management in Germany: Results of an Empirical Study', Corporate Reputation Review, Jg. 8, Nr. 2, S. 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540246
Wiedmann, K. P., & Buxel, H. (2005). Corporate Reputation Management in Germany: Results of an Empirical Study. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(2), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540246
Wiedmann KP, Buxel H. Corporate Reputation Management in Germany: Results of an Empirical Study. Corporate Reputation Review. 2005 Jul 1;8(2):145-163. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540246
Wiedmann, Klaus Peter ; Buxel, Holger. / Corporate Reputation Management in Germany : Results of an Empirical Study. in: Corporate Reputation Review. 2005 ; Jahrgang 8, Nr. 2. S. 145-163.
Download
@article{55b12600663847d58cfb62a77c9afa89,
title = "Corporate Reputation Management in Germany: Results of an Empirical Study",
abstract = "Corporate reputation radiates a strong appeal — it helps companies to obtain good employees, makes customer acquisition easier, increases customer loyalty, can be implemented as a competitive performance factor, and is more than helpful for the procurement of capital, not lastly if a company is listed on the stock exchange. The broad spectrum of potential for opportunity however, cannot be purposefully exhausted without rigorous reputation management. This is why professional corporate reputation management is of pivotal importance. Yet how is yield-oriented reputation management implemented successfully? What objectives, measures and controlling instruments do companies consider to be promising and important? Up to now there has been a lack of sound research which examines the state of the art in corporate practice and which supplies insight into the potential for and evaluation of success in individual instrumental areas. The results presented here of a representative study on the subject of {\textquoteleft}Corporate Reputation Management in Germany{\textquoteright} throw light on and evaluate the current state of reputation management in Germany.",
keywords = "advertising, brand, communications, corporate branding, e-communication, empirical results, identity, image, intangibles, key success factors, philanthropy, positioning, reputation, Reputation management, stakeholder",
author = "Wiedmann, {Klaus Peter} and Holger Buxel",
year = "2005",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540246",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "145--163",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corporate Reputation Management in Germany

T2 - Results of an Empirical Study

AU - Wiedmann, Klaus Peter

AU - Buxel, Holger

PY - 2005/7/1

Y1 - 2005/7/1

N2 - Corporate reputation radiates a strong appeal — it helps companies to obtain good employees, makes customer acquisition easier, increases customer loyalty, can be implemented as a competitive performance factor, and is more than helpful for the procurement of capital, not lastly if a company is listed on the stock exchange. The broad spectrum of potential for opportunity however, cannot be purposefully exhausted without rigorous reputation management. This is why professional corporate reputation management is of pivotal importance. Yet how is yield-oriented reputation management implemented successfully? What objectives, measures and controlling instruments do companies consider to be promising and important? Up to now there has been a lack of sound research which examines the state of the art in corporate practice and which supplies insight into the potential for and evaluation of success in individual instrumental areas. The results presented here of a representative study on the subject of ‘Corporate Reputation Management in Germany’ throw light on and evaluate the current state of reputation management in Germany.

AB - Corporate reputation radiates a strong appeal — it helps companies to obtain good employees, makes customer acquisition easier, increases customer loyalty, can be implemented as a competitive performance factor, and is more than helpful for the procurement of capital, not lastly if a company is listed on the stock exchange. The broad spectrum of potential for opportunity however, cannot be purposefully exhausted without rigorous reputation management. This is why professional corporate reputation management is of pivotal importance. Yet how is yield-oriented reputation management implemented successfully? What objectives, measures and controlling instruments do companies consider to be promising and important? Up to now there has been a lack of sound research which examines the state of the art in corporate practice and which supplies insight into the potential for and evaluation of success in individual instrumental areas. The results presented here of a representative study on the subject of ‘Corporate Reputation Management in Germany’ throw light on and evaluate the current state of reputation management in Germany.

KW - advertising

KW - brand

KW - communications

KW - corporate branding

KW - e-communication

KW - empirical results

KW - identity

KW - image

KW - intangibles

KW - key success factors

KW - philanthropy

KW - positioning

KW - reputation

KW - Reputation management

KW - stakeholder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747880402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540246

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540246

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33747880402

VL - 8

SP - 145

EP - 163

JO - Corporate Reputation Review

JF - Corporate Reputation Review

SN - 1363-3589

IS - 2

ER -