Conclusions and perspectives

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Buch/SammelwerkForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Barbara Zibell
  • Doris Damyanovic
  • Ulrike Sturm

Externe Organisationen

  • Universität für Bodenkultur Wien (BOKU)
  • Hochschule Luzern (HSLU)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des SammelwerksGendered Approaches to Spatial Development in Europe
UntertitelPerspectives, Similarities, Differences
Herausgeber/-innenBarbara Zibell, Doris Damyanovic, Ulrike Sturm
ErscheinungsortLondon
Herausgeber (Verlag)Routledge
Seiten227-235
Seitenumfang9
Auflage1.
ISBN (elektronisch)9780429995033
ISBN (Print)9781138587663
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2019

Abstract

Chapter 9 returns to the question of how recognising gender relevance impacts on the organisation and structure of land-use planning and appropriation in different European cultures. The book’s findings are summarised with regard to knowledge transfer, integration and implementation. Similarities and differences of gender approaches in the different countries are described using opposing couples: formal - informal, top-down - bottom-up, implicit - explicit. In some countries gender concerns are dealing with gender concerns implicitly within quality-driven planning for everyday needs. This is insufficient if gender sensibility should be a principle of spatial development and planning. Formal, top-down and explicit approaches are necessary to change power relations, as are informal and bottom-up activities that may help (re-)introduce needs overlooked in official proceedings. Sustainability Development Goals or Gender Mainstreaming guidelines may fail to penetrate lower levels without more binding commitments in politics, law and planning. This requires consideration of the different cultural contexts. Gender concerns should be on research agendas and political programmes and part of formation and education, especially in disciplines relevant for spatial development like planning, architecture and urbanism. The authors are cautiously optimistic that the fourth generation of feminism will bring about more gender awareness and help to equip professionals with the appropriate skills and tools for gendered spatial development and planning.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Conclusions and perspectives. / Zibell, Barbara; Damyanovic, Doris; Sturm, Ulrike.
Gendered Approaches to Spatial Development in Europe: Perspectives, Similarities, Differences. Hrsg. / Barbara Zibell; Doris Damyanovic; Ulrike Sturm. 1. Aufl. London: Routledge, 2019. S. 227-235.

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandBeitrag in Buch/SammelwerkForschungPeer-Review

Zibell, B, Damyanovic, D & Sturm, U 2019, Conclusions and perspectives. in B Zibell, D Damyanovic & U Sturm (Hrsg.), Gendered Approaches to Spatial Development in Europe: Perspectives, Similarities, Differences. 1. Aufl., Routledge, London, S. 227-235. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503818-13
Zibell, B., Damyanovic, D., & Sturm, U. (2019). Conclusions and perspectives. In B. Zibell, D. Damyanovic, & U. Sturm (Hrsg.), Gendered Approaches to Spatial Development in Europe: Perspectives, Similarities, Differences (1. Aufl., S. 227-235). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503818-13
Zibell B, Damyanovic D, Sturm U. Conclusions and perspectives. in Zibell B, Damyanovic D, Sturm U, Hrsg., Gendered Approaches to Spatial Development in Europe: Perspectives, Similarities, Differences. 1. Aufl. London: Routledge. 2019. S. 227-235 Epub 2019 Apr 15. doi: 10.4324/9780429503818-13
Zibell, Barbara ; Damyanovic, Doris ; Sturm, Ulrike. / Conclusions and perspectives. Gendered Approaches to Spatial Development in Europe: Perspectives, Similarities, Differences. Hrsg. / Barbara Zibell ; Doris Damyanovic ; Ulrike Sturm. 1. Aufl. London : Routledge, 2019. S. 227-235
Download
@inbook{b3278e84c49f439d8e06c0a07b762d47,
title = "Conclusions and perspectives",
abstract = "Chapter 9 returns to the question of how recognising gender relevance impacts on the organisation and structure of land-use planning and appropriation in different European cultures. The book{\textquoteright}s findings are summarised with regard to knowledge transfer, integration and implementation. Similarities and differences of gender approaches in the different countries are described using opposing couples: formal - informal, top-down - bottom-up, implicit - explicit. In some countries gender concerns are dealing with gender concerns implicitly within quality-driven planning for everyday needs. This is insufficient if gender sensibility should be a principle of spatial development and planning. Formal, top-down and explicit approaches are necessary to change power relations, as are informal and bottom-up activities that may help (re-)introduce needs overlooked in official proceedings. Sustainability Development Goals or Gender Mainstreaming guidelines may fail to penetrate lower levels without more binding commitments in politics, law and planning. This requires consideration of the different cultural contexts. Gender concerns should be on research agendas and political programmes and part of formation and education, especially in disciplines relevant for spatial development like planning, architecture and urbanism. The authors are cautiously optimistic that the fourth generation of feminism will bring about more gender awareness and help to equip professionals with the appropriate skills and tools for gendered spatial development and planning.",
author = "Barbara Zibell and Doris Damyanovic and Ulrike Sturm",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 selection and editorial matter, Barbara Zibell, Doris Damyanovic and Ulrike Sturm.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.4324/9780429503818-13",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138587663",
pages = "227--235",
editor = "Barbara Zibell and Doris Damyanovic and Ulrike Sturm",
booktitle = "Gendered Approaches to Spatial Development in Europe",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom (UK)",
edition = "1.",

}

Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Conclusions and perspectives

AU - Zibell, Barbara

AU - Damyanovic, Doris

AU - Sturm, Ulrike

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 selection and editorial matter, Barbara Zibell, Doris Damyanovic and Ulrike Sturm.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Chapter 9 returns to the question of how recognising gender relevance impacts on the organisation and structure of land-use planning and appropriation in different European cultures. The book’s findings are summarised with regard to knowledge transfer, integration and implementation. Similarities and differences of gender approaches in the different countries are described using opposing couples: formal - informal, top-down - bottom-up, implicit - explicit. In some countries gender concerns are dealing with gender concerns implicitly within quality-driven planning for everyday needs. This is insufficient if gender sensibility should be a principle of spatial development and planning. Formal, top-down and explicit approaches are necessary to change power relations, as are informal and bottom-up activities that may help (re-)introduce needs overlooked in official proceedings. Sustainability Development Goals or Gender Mainstreaming guidelines may fail to penetrate lower levels without more binding commitments in politics, law and planning. This requires consideration of the different cultural contexts. Gender concerns should be on research agendas and political programmes and part of formation and education, especially in disciplines relevant for spatial development like planning, architecture and urbanism. The authors are cautiously optimistic that the fourth generation of feminism will bring about more gender awareness and help to equip professionals with the appropriate skills and tools for gendered spatial development and planning.

AB - Chapter 9 returns to the question of how recognising gender relevance impacts on the organisation and structure of land-use planning and appropriation in different European cultures. The book’s findings are summarised with regard to knowledge transfer, integration and implementation. Similarities and differences of gender approaches in the different countries are described using opposing couples: formal - informal, top-down - bottom-up, implicit - explicit. In some countries gender concerns are dealing with gender concerns implicitly within quality-driven planning for everyday needs. This is insufficient if gender sensibility should be a principle of spatial development and planning. Formal, top-down and explicit approaches are necessary to change power relations, as are informal and bottom-up activities that may help (re-)introduce needs overlooked in official proceedings. Sustainability Development Goals or Gender Mainstreaming guidelines may fail to penetrate lower levels without more binding commitments in politics, law and planning. This requires consideration of the different cultural contexts. Gender concerns should be on research agendas and political programmes and part of formation and education, especially in disciplines relevant for spatial development like planning, architecture and urbanism. The authors are cautiously optimistic that the fourth generation of feminism will bring about more gender awareness and help to equip professionals with the appropriate skills and tools for gendered spatial development and planning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136345607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9780429503818-13

DO - 10.4324/9780429503818-13

M3 - Contribution to book/anthology

AN - SCOPUS:85136345607

SN - 9781138587663

SP - 227

EP - 235

BT - Gendered Approaches to Spatial Development in Europe

A2 - Zibell, Barbara

A2 - Damyanovic, Doris

A2 - Sturm, Ulrike

PB - Routledge

CY - London

ER -