Comparison of random sampling and heuristic optimization-based methods for determining the flexibility potential at vertical system interconnections

Publikation: KonferenzbeitragPaperForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Johannes Gerster
  • Marcel Sarstedt
  • Eric Veith
  • Lutz Hofmann
  • Sebastian Lehnhoff

Externe Organisationen

  • OFFIS - Institut für Informatik
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten1-9
Seitenumfang9
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2021
Veranstaltung11th IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe 2021 - Espoo, Finnland
Dauer: 18 Okt. 202121 Nov. 2021
https://ieee-isgt-europe.org/

Konferenz

Konferenz11th IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe 2021
Land/GebietFinnland
OrtEspoo
Zeitraum18 Okt. 202121 Nov. 2021
Internetadresse

Abstract

In order to prevent conflicting or counteracting use of flexibility options, the coordination between distribution system operator and transmission system operator has to be strengthened. For this purpose, methods for the standardized description and identification of the aggregated flexibility potential of distribution grids are developed. Approaches for identifying the feasible operation region (FOR) of distribution grids can be categorized into two main classes: Random sampling/stochastic approaches and optimization-based approaches. While the former have the advantage of working in real-world scenarios where no full grid models exist, when relying on naive sampling strategies, they suffer from poor coverage of the edges of the FOR due to
convoluted distributions. In this paper, we tackle the problem from two different sides. First, we present a random sampling approach which mitigates the convolution problem by drawing sample values from a multivariate Dirichlet distribution. Second, we come up with a hybrid approach which solves the underlying optimal power flow problems of the optimization-based approach
by means of a stochastic evolutionary optimization algorithm codenamed REvol. By means of synthetic feeders, we compare the two proposed FOR identification methods with regard to how well the FOR is covered and number of power flow calculations required.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

Comparison of random sampling and heuristic optimization-based methods for determining the flexibility potential at vertical system interconnections. / Gerster, Johannes; Sarstedt, Marcel; Veith, Eric et al.
2021. 1-9 Beitrag in 11th IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe 2021, Espoo, Finnland.

Publikation: KonferenzbeitragPaperForschungPeer-Review

Gerster, J, Sarstedt, M, Veith, E, Hofmann, L & Lehnhoff, S 2021, 'Comparison of random sampling and heuristic optimization-based methods for determining the flexibility potential at vertical system interconnections', Beitrag in 11th IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe 2021, Espoo, Finnland, 18 Okt. 2021 - 21 Nov. 2021 S. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEurope52324.2021.9640108
Gerster, J., Sarstedt, M., Veith, E., Hofmann, L., & Lehnhoff, S. (2021). Comparison of random sampling and heuristic optimization-based methods for determining the flexibility potential at vertical system interconnections. 1-9. Beitrag in 11th IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe 2021, Espoo, Finnland. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEurope52324.2021.9640108
Gerster J, Sarstedt M, Veith E, Hofmann L, Lehnhoff S. Comparison of random sampling and heuristic optimization-based methods for determining the flexibility potential at vertical system interconnections. 2021. Beitrag in 11th IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe 2021, Espoo, Finnland. doi: 10.1109/ISGTEurope52324.2021.9640108
Gerster, Johannes ; Sarstedt, Marcel ; Veith, Eric et al. / Comparison of random sampling and heuristic optimization-based methods for determining the flexibility potential at vertical system interconnections. Beitrag in 11th IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe 2021, Espoo, Finnland.9 S.
Download
@conference{99c7e64b533a4028831131ce24f95f76,
title = "Comparison of random sampling and heuristic optimization-based methods for determining the flexibility potential at vertical system interconnections",
abstract = "In order to prevent conflicting or counteracting use of flexibility options, the coordination between distribution system operator and transmission system operator has to be strengthened. For this purpose, methods for the standardized description and identification of the aggregated flexibility potential of distribution grids are developed. Approaches for identifying the feasible operation region (FOR) of distribution grids can be categorized into two main classes: Random sampling/stochastic approaches and optimization-based approaches. While the former have the advantage of working in real-world scenarios where no full grid models exist, when relying on naive sampling strategies, they suffer from poor coverage of the edges of the FOR due toconvoluted distributions. In this paper, we tackle the problem from two different sides. First, we present a random sampling approach which mitigates the convolution problem by drawing sample values from a multivariate Dirichlet distribution. Second, we come up with a hybrid approach which solves the underlying optimal power flow problems of the optimization-based approachby means of a stochastic evolutionary optimization algorithm codenamed REvol. By means of synthetic feeders, we compare the two proposed FOR identification methods with regard to how well the FOR is covered and number of power flow calculations required.",
keywords = "convolution of probability distributions, Dirichlet distribution, evolutionary algorithms, feasible operation region, random sampling, TSO/DSO-coordination",
author = "Johannes Gerster and Marcel Sarstedt and Eric Veith and Lutz Hofmann and Sebastian Lehnhoff",
note = "Funding Information: This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - 359921210.; 11th IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe 2021 ; Conference date: 18-10-2021 Through 21-11-2021",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1109/ISGTEurope52324.2021.9640108",
language = "English",
pages = "1--9",
url = "https://ieee-isgt-europe.org/",

}

Download

TY - CONF

T1 - Comparison of random sampling and heuristic optimization-based methods for determining the flexibility potential at vertical system interconnections

AU - Gerster, Johannes

AU - Sarstedt, Marcel

AU - Veith, Eric

AU - Hofmann, Lutz

AU - Lehnhoff, Sebastian

N1 - Funding Information: This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - 359921210.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - In order to prevent conflicting or counteracting use of flexibility options, the coordination between distribution system operator and transmission system operator has to be strengthened. For this purpose, methods for the standardized description and identification of the aggregated flexibility potential of distribution grids are developed. Approaches for identifying the feasible operation region (FOR) of distribution grids can be categorized into two main classes: Random sampling/stochastic approaches and optimization-based approaches. While the former have the advantage of working in real-world scenarios where no full grid models exist, when relying on naive sampling strategies, they suffer from poor coverage of the edges of the FOR due toconvoluted distributions. In this paper, we tackle the problem from two different sides. First, we present a random sampling approach which mitigates the convolution problem by drawing sample values from a multivariate Dirichlet distribution. Second, we come up with a hybrid approach which solves the underlying optimal power flow problems of the optimization-based approachby means of a stochastic evolutionary optimization algorithm codenamed REvol. By means of synthetic feeders, we compare the two proposed FOR identification methods with regard to how well the FOR is covered and number of power flow calculations required.

AB - In order to prevent conflicting or counteracting use of flexibility options, the coordination between distribution system operator and transmission system operator has to be strengthened. For this purpose, methods for the standardized description and identification of the aggregated flexibility potential of distribution grids are developed. Approaches for identifying the feasible operation region (FOR) of distribution grids can be categorized into two main classes: Random sampling/stochastic approaches and optimization-based approaches. While the former have the advantage of working in real-world scenarios where no full grid models exist, when relying on naive sampling strategies, they suffer from poor coverage of the edges of the FOR due toconvoluted distributions. In this paper, we tackle the problem from two different sides. First, we present a random sampling approach which mitigates the convolution problem by drawing sample values from a multivariate Dirichlet distribution. Second, we come up with a hybrid approach which solves the underlying optimal power flow problems of the optimization-based approachby means of a stochastic evolutionary optimization algorithm codenamed REvol. By means of synthetic feeders, we compare the two proposed FOR identification methods with regard to how well the FOR is covered and number of power flow calculations required.

KW - convolution of probability distributions

KW - Dirichlet distribution

KW - evolutionary algorithms

KW - feasible operation region

KW - random sampling

KW - TSO/DSO-coordination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123647976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ISGTEurope52324.2021.9640108

DO - 10.1109/ISGTEurope52324.2021.9640108

M3 - Paper

SP - 1

EP - 9

T2 - 11th IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe 2021

Y2 - 18 October 2021 through 21 November 2021

ER -

Von denselben Autoren