Comparison of methods for state prediction: Power Flow Decomposition (PFD), AC Power Transfer Distribution factors (AC-PTDFs), and Power Transfer Distribution factors (PTDFs)

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des Sammelwerks2014 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC)
Seiten1-6
Seitenumfang6
AuflageMarch
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 23 März 2014

Publikationsreihe

NameAsia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, APPEEC
ISSN (Print)2157-4839

Abstract

The precise prediction of changes in load flows, currents and voltage magnitudes due to changes in power is important for forecasting and managing grid congestions, voltage deviations and minimizing grid losses for example. This paper describes three different methods and further variants of those for state prediction and compares their approximations, neglects and quality of prediction. Since PTDFs and PFD modify the characteristics of the non-linear load flow equations by approximations and neglects, their qualities of prediction are less than those of the AC-PTDFs. To consider the way changings in grid losses are counteracted by the grid a new variant to consider secondary control reserve in the prediction is established. The AC-PTDFs deliver the highest quality of current and loss prediction, the most comprehensive mathematical approximation of the non-linear load flow equations, and the most potential for further development like optimized management of multiple congestions and Optimal Power Flow.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Comparison of methods for state prediction: Power Flow Decomposition (PFD), AC Power Transfer Distribution factors (AC-PTDFs), and Power Transfer Distribution factors (PTDFs). / Leveringhaus, T.; Hofmann, L.
2014 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC). March. Aufl. 2014. S. 1-6 (Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, APPEEC).

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Leveringhaus, T & Hofmann, L 2014, Comparison of methods for state prediction: Power Flow Decomposition (PFD), AC Power Transfer Distribution factors (AC-PTDFs), and Power Transfer Distribution factors (PTDFs). in 2014 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC). March Aufl., Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, APPEEC, S. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/appeec.2014.7066183
Leveringhaus, T., & Hofmann, L. (2014). Comparison of methods for state prediction: Power Flow Decomposition (PFD), AC Power Transfer Distribution factors (AC-PTDFs), and Power Transfer Distribution factors (PTDFs). In 2014 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC) (March Aufl., S. 1-6). (Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, APPEEC). https://doi.org/10.1109/appeec.2014.7066183
Leveringhaus T, Hofmann L. Comparison of methods for state prediction: Power Flow Decomposition (PFD), AC Power Transfer Distribution factors (AC-PTDFs), and Power Transfer Distribution factors (PTDFs). in 2014 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC). March Aufl. 2014. S. 1-6. (Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, APPEEC). doi: 10.1109/appeec.2014.7066183
Leveringhaus, T. ; Hofmann, L. / Comparison of methods for state prediction: Power Flow Decomposition (PFD), AC Power Transfer Distribution factors (AC-PTDFs), and Power Transfer Distribution factors (PTDFs). 2014 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC). March. Aufl. 2014. S. 1-6 (Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, APPEEC).
Download
@inproceedings{99f85c405fd54f5f944bf2124d592f83,
title = "Comparison of methods for state prediction: Power Flow Decomposition (PFD), AC Power Transfer Distribution factors (AC-PTDFs), and Power Transfer Distribution factors (PTDFs)",
abstract = "The precise prediction of changes in load flows, currents and voltage magnitudes due to changes in power is important for forecasting and managing grid congestions, voltage deviations and minimizing grid losses for example. This paper describes three different methods and further variants of those for state prediction and compares their approximations, neglects and quality of prediction. Since PTDFs and PFD modify the characteristics of the non-linear load flow equations by approximations and neglects, their qualities of prediction are less than those of the AC-PTDFs. To consider the way changings in grid losses are counteracted by the grid a new variant to consider secondary control reserve in the prediction is established. The AC-PTDFs deliver the highest quality of current and loss prediction, the most comprehensive mathematical approximation of the non-linear load flow equations, and the most potential for further development like optimized management of multiple congestions and Optimal Power Flow.",
keywords = "AC Power Transfer Distribution factors (AC-PTDFs), Power Flow Decomposition (PFD), Power Transfer Distribution factors (PTDF), congestion management, distributed slack, optimal power flow",
author = "T. Leveringhaus and L. Hofmann",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014 IEEE. Copyright: Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1109/appeec.2014.7066183",
language = "English",
series = "Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, APPEEC",
pages = "1--6",
booktitle = "2014 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC)",
edition = "March",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of methods for state prediction: Power Flow Decomposition (PFD), AC Power Transfer Distribution factors (AC-PTDFs), and Power Transfer Distribution factors (PTDFs)

AU - Leveringhaus, T.

AU - Hofmann, L.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2014 IEEE. Copyright: Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2014/3/23

Y1 - 2014/3/23

N2 - The precise prediction of changes in load flows, currents and voltage magnitudes due to changes in power is important for forecasting and managing grid congestions, voltage deviations and minimizing grid losses for example. This paper describes three different methods and further variants of those for state prediction and compares their approximations, neglects and quality of prediction. Since PTDFs and PFD modify the characteristics of the non-linear load flow equations by approximations and neglects, their qualities of prediction are less than those of the AC-PTDFs. To consider the way changings in grid losses are counteracted by the grid a new variant to consider secondary control reserve in the prediction is established. The AC-PTDFs deliver the highest quality of current and loss prediction, the most comprehensive mathematical approximation of the non-linear load flow equations, and the most potential for further development like optimized management of multiple congestions and Optimal Power Flow.

AB - The precise prediction of changes in load flows, currents and voltage magnitudes due to changes in power is important for forecasting and managing grid congestions, voltage deviations and minimizing grid losses for example. This paper describes three different methods and further variants of those for state prediction and compares their approximations, neglects and quality of prediction. Since PTDFs and PFD modify the characteristics of the non-linear load flow equations by approximations and neglects, their qualities of prediction are less than those of the AC-PTDFs. To consider the way changings in grid losses are counteracted by the grid a new variant to consider secondary control reserve in the prediction is established. The AC-PTDFs deliver the highest quality of current and loss prediction, the most comprehensive mathematical approximation of the non-linear load flow equations, and the most potential for further development like optimized management of multiple congestions and Optimal Power Flow.

KW - AC Power Transfer Distribution factors (AC-PTDFs)

KW - Power Flow Decomposition (PFD)

KW - Power Transfer Distribution factors (PTDF)

KW - congestion management

KW - distributed slack

KW - optimal power flow

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983122482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/appeec.2014.7066183

DO - 10.1109/appeec.2014.7066183

M3 - Conference contribution

T3 - Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, APPEEC

SP - 1

EP - 6

BT - 2014 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC)

ER -

Von denselben Autoren