Comparison and evaluation of clock-aided and classical multi-GNSS flight navigation

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Ankit Jain
  • Steffen Schön

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Titel des Sammelwerks2020 European Navigation Conference, ENC 2020
Herausgeber/-innenGalina Lange
Herausgeber (Verlag)Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
ISBN (elektronisch)9783944976273
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2020
Veranstaltung2020 European Navigation Conference - Dresden, Deutschland
Dauer: 23 Nov. 202024 Nov. 2020

Abstract

Maintaining the navigation performance with respect to a certain standard is of prime importance in civil aviation operations. In global navigation satellite system (GNSS) based position estimates, the height component is less accurate specifically due to the receiver clock bias. Further, the height component is of high relevance in all phases of flight navigation. With the concept of receiver clock modeling (RCM), sometimes called as clock coasting, the accuracy of the height component could be improved by a large extent. In this paper, we present experimental results of code-based flight navigation computed using two different methods. GNSS observations are recorded on an aerial flight for about three hours with multiple GNSS receivers and an inertial measurement unit (IMU), some of these receivers are connected with external atomic clocks. Data captured is processed post-flight; position and clock bias are estimated at first using multi-GNSS code observations with a Linearized Kalman filter (LKF) without applying the concept of RCM; later using LKF approach and applying the concept of RCM. Finally, the estimated positions are compared with the reference trajectory and the topocentric coordinate differences are evaluated using both methods. Experimental results demonstrate that the precision in the height component is improved by about 80% using GPS and GLONASS observations with RCM applied compared to a positioning solution without applying RCM. There is no significant difference in the horizontal coordinates for the navigation solutions computed using the two different methods.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Comparison and evaluation of clock-aided and classical multi-GNSS flight navigation. / Jain, Ankit; Schön, Steffen.
2020 European Navigation Conference, ENC 2020. Hrsg. / Galina Lange. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2020. 9317438.

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/Sammelwerk/KonferenzbandAufsatz in KonferenzbandForschungPeer-Review

Jain, A & Schön, S 2020, Comparison and evaluation of clock-aided and classical multi-GNSS flight navigation. in G Lange (Hrsg.), 2020 European Navigation Conference, ENC 2020., 9317438, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2020 European Navigation Conference, Dresden, Deutschland, 23 Nov. 2020. https://doi.org/10.23919/ENC48637.2020.9317438
Jain, A., & Schön, S. (2020). Comparison and evaluation of clock-aided and classical multi-GNSS flight navigation. In G. Lange (Hrsg.), 2020 European Navigation Conference, ENC 2020 Artikel 9317438 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.23919/ENC48637.2020.9317438
Jain A, Schön S. Comparison and evaluation of clock-aided and classical multi-GNSS flight navigation. in Lange G, Hrsg., 2020 European Navigation Conference, ENC 2020. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2020. 9317438 doi: 10.23919/ENC48637.2020.9317438
Jain, Ankit ; Schön, Steffen. / Comparison and evaluation of clock-aided and classical multi-GNSS flight navigation. 2020 European Navigation Conference, ENC 2020. Hrsg. / Galina Lange. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2020.
Download
@inproceedings{5463d54ebcf14469a6535b91e94a3993,
title = "Comparison and evaluation of clock-aided and classical multi-GNSS flight navigation",
abstract = "Maintaining the navigation performance with respect to a certain standard is of prime importance in civil aviation operations. In global navigation satellite system (GNSS) based position estimates, the height component is less accurate specifically due to the receiver clock bias. Further, the height component is of high relevance in all phases of flight navigation. With the concept of receiver clock modeling (RCM), sometimes called as clock coasting, the accuracy of the height component could be improved by a large extent. In this paper, we present experimental results of code-based flight navigation computed using two different methods. GNSS observations are recorded on an aerial flight for about three hours with multiple GNSS receivers and an inertial measurement unit (IMU), some of these receivers are connected with external atomic clocks. Data captured is processed post-flight; position and clock bias are estimated at first using multi-GNSS code observations with a Linearized Kalman filter (LKF) without applying the concept of RCM; later using LKF approach and applying the concept of RCM. Finally, the estimated positions are compared with the reference trajectory and the topocentric coordinate differences are evaluated using both methods. Experimental results demonstrate that the precision in the height component is improved by about 80% using GPS and GLONASS observations with RCM applied compared to a positioning solution without applying RCM. There is no significant difference in the horizontal coordinates for the navigation solutions computed using the two different methods.",
author = "Ankit Jain and Steffen Sch{\"o}n",
note = "Funding Information: The authors would like to thank Dr. Jens Kremer and Andreas Dach from IGI mbH for conducting the flight experiment with us and providing the reference trajectory solution. The authors also thank Dr. Thomas Krawinkel from our group for his time and valuable insights with regards to the planning of the flight experiment. This work has received funding from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, following a resolution of the German Bundestag (project number: 50NA1705).; 2020 European Navigation Conference, ENC 2020 ; Conference date: 23-11-2020 Through 24-11-2020",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.23919/ENC48637.2020.9317438",
language = "English",
editor = "Galina Lange",
booktitle = "2020 European Navigation Conference, ENC 2020",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
address = "United States",

}

Download

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison and evaluation of clock-aided and classical multi-GNSS flight navigation

AU - Jain, Ankit

AU - Schön, Steffen

N1 - Funding Information: The authors would like to thank Dr. Jens Kremer and Andreas Dach from IGI mbH for conducting the flight experiment with us and providing the reference trajectory solution. The authors also thank Dr. Thomas Krawinkel from our group for his time and valuable insights with regards to the planning of the flight experiment. This work has received funding from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, following a resolution of the German Bundestag (project number: 50NA1705).

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Maintaining the navigation performance with respect to a certain standard is of prime importance in civil aviation operations. In global navigation satellite system (GNSS) based position estimates, the height component is less accurate specifically due to the receiver clock bias. Further, the height component is of high relevance in all phases of flight navigation. With the concept of receiver clock modeling (RCM), sometimes called as clock coasting, the accuracy of the height component could be improved by a large extent. In this paper, we present experimental results of code-based flight navigation computed using two different methods. GNSS observations are recorded on an aerial flight for about three hours with multiple GNSS receivers and an inertial measurement unit (IMU), some of these receivers are connected with external atomic clocks. Data captured is processed post-flight; position and clock bias are estimated at first using multi-GNSS code observations with a Linearized Kalman filter (LKF) without applying the concept of RCM; later using LKF approach and applying the concept of RCM. Finally, the estimated positions are compared with the reference trajectory and the topocentric coordinate differences are evaluated using both methods. Experimental results demonstrate that the precision in the height component is improved by about 80% using GPS and GLONASS observations with RCM applied compared to a positioning solution without applying RCM. There is no significant difference in the horizontal coordinates for the navigation solutions computed using the two different methods.

AB - Maintaining the navigation performance with respect to a certain standard is of prime importance in civil aviation operations. In global navigation satellite system (GNSS) based position estimates, the height component is less accurate specifically due to the receiver clock bias. Further, the height component is of high relevance in all phases of flight navigation. With the concept of receiver clock modeling (RCM), sometimes called as clock coasting, the accuracy of the height component could be improved by a large extent. In this paper, we present experimental results of code-based flight navigation computed using two different methods. GNSS observations are recorded on an aerial flight for about three hours with multiple GNSS receivers and an inertial measurement unit (IMU), some of these receivers are connected with external atomic clocks. Data captured is processed post-flight; position and clock bias are estimated at first using multi-GNSS code observations with a Linearized Kalman filter (LKF) without applying the concept of RCM; later using LKF approach and applying the concept of RCM. Finally, the estimated positions are compared with the reference trajectory and the topocentric coordinate differences are evaluated using both methods. Experimental results demonstrate that the precision in the height component is improved by about 80% using GPS and GLONASS observations with RCM applied compared to a positioning solution without applying RCM. There is no significant difference in the horizontal coordinates for the navigation solutions computed using the two different methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100570333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.23919/ENC48637.2020.9317438

DO - 10.23919/ENC48637.2020.9317438

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85100570333

BT - 2020 European Navigation Conference, ENC 2020

A2 - Lange, Galina

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

T2 - 2020 European Navigation Conference

Y2 - 23 November 2020 through 24 November 2020

ER -