Comparing classical and quantum equilibration

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Artur S.L. Malabarba
  • Terry Farrelly
  • Anthony J. Short

Externe Organisationen

  • University of Bristol
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer032119
FachzeitschriftPhysical Review E
Jahrgang94
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 15 Sept. 2016
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

By using a physically relevant and theory independent definition of measurement-based equilibration, we show quantitatively that equilibration is easier for quantum systems than for classical systems, in the situation where the initial state of the system is completely known (a pure state). This shows that quantum equilibration is a fundamental aspect of many quantum systems, while classical equilibration relies on experimental ignorance. When the state is not completely known (a mixed state), this framework also shows that quantum equilibration requires weaker conditions.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Comparing classical and quantum equilibration. / Malabarba, Artur S.L.; Farrelly, Terry; Short, Anthony J.
in: Physical Review E, Jahrgang 94, Nr. 3, 032119, 15.09.2016.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Malabarba, ASL, Farrelly, T & Short, AJ 2016, 'Comparing classical and quantum equilibration', Physical Review E, Jg. 94, Nr. 3, 032119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032119
Malabarba, A. S. L., Farrelly, T., & Short, A. J. (2016). Comparing classical and quantum equilibration. Physical Review E, 94(3), Artikel 032119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032119
Malabarba ASL, Farrelly T, Short AJ. Comparing classical and quantum equilibration. Physical Review E. 2016 Sep 15;94(3):032119. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032119
Malabarba, Artur S.L. ; Farrelly, Terry ; Short, Anthony J. / Comparing classical and quantum equilibration. in: Physical Review E. 2016 ; Jahrgang 94, Nr. 3.
Download
@article{4345b167133f4d22a7ee2db7a4e621f7,
title = "Comparing classical and quantum equilibration",
abstract = "By using a physically relevant and theory independent definition of measurement-based equilibration, we show quantitatively that equilibration is easier for quantum systems than for classical systems, in the situation where the initial state of the system is completely known (a pure state). This shows that quantum equilibration is a fundamental aspect of many quantum systems, while classical equilibration relies on experimental ignorance. When the state is not completely known (a mixed state), this framework also shows that quantum equilibration requires weaker conditions.",
author = "Malabarba, {Artur S.L.} and Terry Farrelly and Short, {Anthony J.}",
note = "Funding information: A.J.S. acknowledges support from the Royal Society and FQXi through SVCF. A.S.L.M. acknowledges support from the CNPq. T.F. is grateful for support from the ERC grants QFTCMPS and SIQS and by the cluster of excellence EXC201 Quantum Engineering and Space-Time Research.",
year = "2016",
month = sep,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032119",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
journal = "Physical Review E",
issn = "2470-0045",
publisher = "American Physical Society",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing classical and quantum equilibration

AU - Malabarba, Artur S.L.

AU - Farrelly, Terry

AU - Short, Anthony J.

N1 - Funding information: A.J.S. acknowledges support from the Royal Society and FQXi through SVCF. A.S.L.M. acknowledges support from the CNPq. T.F. is grateful for support from the ERC grants QFTCMPS and SIQS and by the cluster of excellence EXC201 Quantum Engineering and Space-Time Research.

PY - 2016/9/15

Y1 - 2016/9/15

N2 - By using a physically relevant and theory independent definition of measurement-based equilibration, we show quantitatively that equilibration is easier for quantum systems than for classical systems, in the situation where the initial state of the system is completely known (a pure state). This shows that quantum equilibration is a fundamental aspect of many quantum systems, while classical equilibration relies on experimental ignorance. When the state is not completely known (a mixed state), this framework also shows that quantum equilibration requires weaker conditions.

AB - By using a physically relevant and theory independent definition of measurement-based equilibration, we show quantitatively that equilibration is easier for quantum systems than for classical systems, in the situation where the initial state of the system is completely known (a pure state). This shows that quantum equilibration is a fundamental aspect of many quantum systems, while classical equilibration relies on experimental ignorance. When the state is not completely known (a mixed state), this framework also shows that quantum equilibration requires weaker conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990211625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032119

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.032119

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84990211625

VL - 94

JO - Physical Review E

JF - Physical Review E

SN - 2470-0045

IS - 3

M1 - 032119

ER -