Beyond Judicialization: Why We Need More Comparative Research About Constitutional Courts

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

Autoren

  • Christoph Hönnige

Organisationseinheiten

Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)346–358
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftEuropean political science
Jahrgang10
Ausgabenummer3
Frühes Online-Datum10 Dez. 2010
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Sept. 2011

Abstract

Constitutional courts play an increasing role in policymaking and the concepts of comparative politics. Traditionally, research has focused on the Judicialization hypothesis for European courts. This article argues that there is a major research gap regarding justices’ preferences, intra- and inter-institutional rules and that it is necessary to move beyond the Judicialization hypothesis to integrate courts in concepts of comparative politics. It outlines four theoretical and methodological challenges for future research on constitutional courts.

Zitieren

Beyond Judicialization: Why We Need More Comparative Research About Constitutional Courts. / Hönnige, Christoph.
in: European political science, Jahrgang 10, Nr. 3, 01.09.2011, S. 346–358.

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review

Hönnige C. Beyond Judicialization: Why We Need More Comparative Research About Constitutional Courts. European political science. 2011 Sep 1;10(3):346–358. Epub 2010 Dez 10. doi: 10.1057/eps.2010.51
Download
@article{7e2867704dca49518afb3c9075ea80a7,
title = "Beyond Judicialization: Why We Need More Comparative Research About Constitutional Courts",
abstract = "Constitutional courts play an increasing role in policymaking and the concepts of comparative politics. Traditionally, research has focused on the Judicialization hypothesis for European courts. This article argues that there is a major research gap regarding justices{\textquoteright} preferences, intra- and inter-institutional rules and that it is necessary to move beyond the Judicialization hypothesis to integrate courts in concepts of comparative politics. It outlines four theoretical and methodological challenges for future research on constitutional courts.",
keywords = "comparative politics, constitutional courts, judicialization",
author = "Christoph H{\"o}nnige",
year = "2011",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/eps.2010.51",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "346–358",
journal = "European political science",
issn = "1680-4333",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond Judicialization: Why We Need More Comparative Research About Constitutional Courts

AU - Hönnige, Christoph

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Constitutional courts play an increasing role in policymaking and the concepts of comparative politics. Traditionally, research has focused on the Judicialization hypothesis for European courts. This article argues that there is a major research gap regarding justices’ preferences, intra- and inter-institutional rules and that it is necessary to move beyond the Judicialization hypothesis to integrate courts in concepts of comparative politics. It outlines four theoretical and methodological challenges for future research on constitutional courts.

AB - Constitutional courts play an increasing role in policymaking and the concepts of comparative politics. Traditionally, research has focused on the Judicialization hypothesis for European courts. This article argues that there is a major research gap regarding justices’ preferences, intra- and inter-institutional rules and that it is necessary to move beyond the Judicialization hypothesis to integrate courts in concepts of comparative politics. It outlines four theoretical and methodological challenges for future research on constitutional courts.

KW - comparative politics

KW - constitutional courts

KW - judicialization

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/eps.2010.51

U2 - 10.1057/eps.2010.51

DO - 10.1057/eps.2010.51

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 346

EP - 358

JO - European political science

JF - European political science

SN - 1680-4333

IS - 3

ER -