Betting against sentiment? Seemingly unrelated anomalies and the low-risk effect

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Maik Dierkes
  • Sebastian Schroen
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)152-176
Seitenumfang25
FachzeitschriftReview of Financial Economics
Jahrgang41
Ausgabenummer2
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 10 Apr. 2023

Abstract

The negative CAPM alphas of high-beta and high-variance stocks are attributable to an unaccounted factor in the CAPM. We use eight seemingly unrelated anomalies to construct a composite factor in the spirit of the optimal orthogonal portfolio (FOP). Accounting for FOP re-establishes a positive relation between beta and average returns in time series regressions as well as cross-sectional and explains the negative alphas of high-beta and high-variance stocks. To analyze economic drivers behind FOP, we perform a horse race between leverage constraints, investor sentiment, and disagreement. Our results highlight investor sentiment as the most promising explanation for the low-risk effect.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Betting against sentiment? Seemingly unrelated anomalies and the low-risk effect. / Dierkes, Maik; Schroen, Sebastian.
in: Review of Financial Economics, Jahrgang 41, Nr. 2, 10.04.2023, S. 152-176.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Dierkes, M & Schroen, S 2023, 'Betting against sentiment? Seemingly unrelated anomalies and the low-risk effect', Review of Financial Economics, Jg. 41, Nr. 2, S. 152-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1170
Dierkes, M., & Schroen, S. (2023). Betting against sentiment? Seemingly unrelated anomalies and the low-risk effect. Review of Financial Economics, 41(2), 152-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1170
Dierkes M, Schroen S. Betting against sentiment? Seemingly unrelated anomalies and the low-risk effect. Review of Financial Economics. 2023 Apr 10;41(2):152-176. doi: 10.1002/rfe.1170
Dierkes, Maik ; Schroen, Sebastian. / Betting against sentiment? Seemingly unrelated anomalies and the low-risk effect. in: Review of Financial Economics. 2023 ; Jahrgang 41, Nr. 2. S. 152-176.
Download
@article{11caec39e1d44c63928df9eebf270a9f,
title = "Betting against sentiment?: Seemingly unrelated anomalies and the low-risk effect",
abstract = "The negative CAPM alphas of high-beta and high-variance stocks are attributable to an unaccounted factor in the CAPM. We use eight seemingly unrelated anomalies to construct a composite factor in the spirit of the optimal orthogonal portfolio (FOP). Accounting for FOP re-establishes a positive relation between beta and average returns in time series regressions as well as cross-sectional and explains the negative alphas of high-beta and high-variance stocks. To analyze economic drivers behind FOP, we perform a horse race between leverage constraints, investor sentiment, and disagreement. Our results highlight investor sentiment as the most promising explanation for the low-risk effect.",
keywords = "CAPM, low-risk effect, optimal orthogonal portfolio",
author = "Maik Dierkes and Sebastian Schroen",
note = "Funding Information: Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.",
year = "2023",
month = apr,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1002/rfe.1170",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "152--176",
number = "2",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Betting against sentiment?

T2 - Seemingly unrelated anomalies and the low-risk effect

AU - Dierkes, Maik

AU - Schroen, Sebastian

N1 - Funding Information: Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

PY - 2023/4/10

Y1 - 2023/4/10

N2 - The negative CAPM alphas of high-beta and high-variance stocks are attributable to an unaccounted factor in the CAPM. We use eight seemingly unrelated anomalies to construct a composite factor in the spirit of the optimal orthogonal portfolio (FOP). Accounting for FOP re-establishes a positive relation between beta and average returns in time series regressions as well as cross-sectional and explains the negative alphas of high-beta and high-variance stocks. To analyze economic drivers behind FOP, we perform a horse race between leverage constraints, investor sentiment, and disagreement. Our results highlight investor sentiment as the most promising explanation for the low-risk effect.

AB - The negative CAPM alphas of high-beta and high-variance stocks are attributable to an unaccounted factor in the CAPM. We use eight seemingly unrelated anomalies to construct a composite factor in the spirit of the optimal orthogonal portfolio (FOP). Accounting for FOP re-establishes a positive relation between beta and average returns in time series regressions as well as cross-sectional and explains the negative alphas of high-beta and high-variance stocks. To analyze economic drivers behind FOP, we perform a horse race between leverage constraints, investor sentiment, and disagreement. Our results highlight investor sentiment as the most promising explanation for the low-risk effect.

KW - CAPM

KW - low-risk effect

KW - optimal orthogonal portfolio

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134528684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/rfe.1170

DO - 10.1002/rfe.1170

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85134528684

VL - 41

SP - 152

EP - 176

JO - Review of Financial Economics

JF - Review of Financial Economics

SN - 1058-3300

IS - 2

ER -