“Bed bugs live in dirty places”: How Using Live Animals in Teaching Contributes to Reducing Stigma, Disgust, Psychological Stigma, and Misinformation in Students

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Roman Asshoff
  • Benedikt Heuckmann
  • Mike Ryl
  • Klaus Reinhardt

Externe Organisationen

  • Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster (WWU)
  • Technische Universität Dresden
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummerar73
FachzeitschriftCBE life sciences education
Jahrgang21
Ausgabenummer4
Frühes Online-Datum4 Okt. 2022
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Dez. 2022

Abstract

Bed bugs are on the rise and are increasingly perceived as harmful parasites. Because individuals affected by bed bugs often feel disgust and shame and are stigmatized, bed bugs are an important public health and environmental justice concern and therefore a health education issue as well. In this quasi-experimental study, we examine how different constructs, namely, forms of stigma, disgust, psychological distance, and myths about bed bugs (dependent variables), change over time (pre/posttest) in response to two forms of teaching intervention (independent variables) in upper secondary-level high school. The content of the interventions was the same, but in class, we showed live bed bugs to one group of students, assuming this would lead to a more realistic, less imaginative response to bed bugs than in the group presented with only pictures of bed bugs. Together with previous studies, we assumed that live bed bugs would be perceived as less disgusting and with a lower degree of stigmatization. Our results show that stigma, psychological distance, and myths can be reduced through intervention (regardless of live animal or picture). Disgust was more strongly reduced by live animals than by pictures. We present implications for biology education and contemporary health education.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

“Bed bugs live in dirty places”: How Using Live Animals in Teaching Contributes to Reducing Stigma, Disgust, Psychological Stigma, and Misinformation in Students. / Asshoff, Roman; Heuckmann, Benedikt; Ryl, Mike et al.
in: CBE life sciences education, Jahrgang 21, Nr. 4, ar73, 01.12.2022.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{0621ee0e05af4ef2972203d4b4e1cd5a,
title = "“Bed bugs live in dirty places”: How Using Live Animals in Teaching Contributes to Reducing Stigma, Disgust, Psychological Stigma, and Misinformation in Students",
abstract = "Bed bugs are on the rise and are increasingly perceived as harmful parasites. Because individuals affected by bed bugs often feel disgust and shame and are stigmatized, bed bugs are an important public health and environmental justice concern and therefore a health education issue as well. In this quasi-experimental study, we examine how different constructs, namely, forms of stigma, disgust, psychological distance, and myths about bed bugs (dependent variables), change over time (pre/posttest) in response to two forms of teaching intervention (independent variables) in upper secondary-level high school. The content of the interventions was the same, but in class, we showed live bed bugs to one group of students, assuming this would lead to a more realistic, less imaginative response to bed bugs than in the group presented with only pictures of bed bugs. Together with previous studies, we assumed that live bed bugs would be perceived as less disgusting and with a lower degree of stigmatization. Our results show that stigma, psychological distance, and myths can be reduced through intervention (regardless of live animal or picture). Disgust was more strongly reduced by live animals than by pictures. We present implications for biology education and contemporary health education.",
author = "Roman Asshoff and Benedikt Heuckmann and Mike Ryl and Klaus Reinhardt",
note = "Funding Information: We thank all teachers and students for their commitment to participate in the study. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of M{\"u}n-ster. We thank the reviewers for constructive criticism and helpful comments on the manuscript.",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1187/cbe.22-03-0056",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "CBE life sciences education",
issn = "1931-7913",
publisher = "American Society for Cell Biology",
number = "4",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Bed bugs live in dirty places”

T2 - How Using Live Animals in Teaching Contributes to Reducing Stigma, Disgust, Psychological Stigma, and Misinformation in Students

AU - Asshoff, Roman

AU - Heuckmann, Benedikt

AU - Ryl, Mike

AU - Reinhardt, Klaus

N1 - Funding Information: We thank all teachers and students for their commitment to participate in the study. We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Mün-ster. We thank the reviewers for constructive criticism and helpful comments on the manuscript.

PY - 2022/12/1

Y1 - 2022/12/1

N2 - Bed bugs are on the rise and are increasingly perceived as harmful parasites. Because individuals affected by bed bugs often feel disgust and shame and are stigmatized, bed bugs are an important public health and environmental justice concern and therefore a health education issue as well. In this quasi-experimental study, we examine how different constructs, namely, forms of stigma, disgust, psychological distance, and myths about bed bugs (dependent variables), change over time (pre/posttest) in response to two forms of teaching intervention (independent variables) in upper secondary-level high school. The content of the interventions was the same, but in class, we showed live bed bugs to one group of students, assuming this would lead to a more realistic, less imaginative response to bed bugs than in the group presented with only pictures of bed bugs. Together with previous studies, we assumed that live bed bugs would be perceived as less disgusting and with a lower degree of stigmatization. Our results show that stigma, psychological distance, and myths can be reduced through intervention (regardless of live animal or picture). Disgust was more strongly reduced by live animals than by pictures. We present implications for biology education and contemporary health education.

AB - Bed bugs are on the rise and are increasingly perceived as harmful parasites. Because individuals affected by bed bugs often feel disgust and shame and are stigmatized, bed bugs are an important public health and environmental justice concern and therefore a health education issue as well. In this quasi-experimental study, we examine how different constructs, namely, forms of stigma, disgust, psychological distance, and myths about bed bugs (dependent variables), change over time (pre/posttest) in response to two forms of teaching intervention (independent variables) in upper secondary-level high school. The content of the interventions was the same, but in class, we showed live bed bugs to one group of students, assuming this would lead to a more realistic, less imaginative response to bed bugs than in the group presented with only pictures of bed bugs. Together with previous studies, we assumed that live bed bugs would be perceived as less disgusting and with a lower degree of stigmatization. Our results show that stigma, psychological distance, and myths can be reduced through intervention (regardless of live animal or picture). Disgust was more strongly reduced by live animals than by pictures. We present implications for biology education and contemporary health education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139573070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1187/cbe.22-03-0056

DO - 10.1187/cbe.22-03-0056

M3 - Article

C2 - 36194505

AN - SCOPUS:85139573070

VL - 21

JO - CBE life sciences education

JF - CBE life sciences education

SN - 1931-7913

IS - 4

M1 - ar73

ER -