Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 10331-10341 |
| Seitenumfang | 11 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Synthese |
| Jahrgang | 199 |
| Ausgabenummer | 3-4 |
| Frühes Online-Datum | 22 Juni 2021 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - Dez. 2021 |
Abstract
In this paper I will analyze and criticize Linsbichler’s recent proposition to interpret the fundamental axiom of Praxeology as analytic. I will first describe Linsbichler’s problem situation. I will then describe and criticize Linsbichler’s proposed solution to his problem; namely his interpretation of the fundamental axiom as analytic. I will argue that this idea does not fully utilize critical potentials that are available to improve the fundamental axiom. I will propose an alternative interpretation which I call the ‘critical interpretation’ that conserves the progressive aspects of Linsbichler’s proposal while eliminating undesirable ones.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Geisteswissenschaftliche Fächer (insg.)
- Philosophie
- Sozialwissenschaften (insg.)
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Synthese, Jahrgang 199, Nr. 3-4, 12.2021, S. 10331-10341.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Austrian Economics without extreme apriorism: A critical reply
AU - Lipski, Jonas Gabriel
N1 - Funding Information: I thank Philippe van Baßhuysen, Uljana Feest, Alexander Linsbichler and Chrysostomos Mantzavinos for helpful discussions of the arguments proposed in earlier versions of this paper. The research for this paper was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) as part of the research training group GRK 2073 Integrating Ethics and Epistemology of Scientific Research.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - In this paper I will analyze and criticize Linsbichler’s recent proposition to interpret the fundamental axiom of Praxeology as analytic. I will first describe Linsbichler’s problem situation. I will then describe and criticize Linsbichler’s proposed solution to his problem; namely his interpretation of the fundamental axiom as analytic. I will argue that this idea does not fully utilize critical potentials that are available to improve the fundamental axiom. I will propose an alternative interpretation which I call the ‘critical interpretation’ that conserves the progressive aspects of Linsbichler’s proposal while eliminating undesirable ones.
AB - In this paper I will analyze and criticize Linsbichler’s recent proposition to interpret the fundamental axiom of Praxeology as analytic. I will first describe Linsbichler’s problem situation. I will then describe and criticize Linsbichler’s proposed solution to his problem; namely his interpretation of the fundamental axiom as analytic. I will argue that this idea does not fully utilize critical potentials that are available to improve the fundamental axiom. I will propose an alternative interpretation which I call the ‘critical interpretation’ that conserves the progressive aspects of Linsbichler’s proposal while eliminating undesirable ones.
KW - Austrian economics
KW - Critical rationalism
KW - Philosophy of economics
KW - Praxeology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108657481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11229-021-03249-7
DO - 10.1007/s11229-021-03249-7
M3 - Article
VL - 199
SP - 10331
EP - 10341
JO - Synthese
JF - Synthese
SN - 0039-7857
IS - 3-4
ER -