Assessing ecosystem service potentials to evaluate terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types in Northern Germany: An expert-based matrix approach

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Felix Müller
  • Sabine Bicking
  • Kai Ahrendt
  • Dang Kinh Bac
  • Irmgard Blindow
  • Christine Fuerst
  • Peter Haase
  • Marion Kruse
  • Tim Kruse
  • Liwei Ma
  • Marie Perennes
  • Ivana Ruljevic
  • Gerald Schernewski
  • Claus-Georg Schimming
  • Anik Schneiders
  • Hendrik Schubert
  • NoteJohanna Schumacher
  • Ulrike Tappeiner
  • Peter Wangai
  • Wilhelm Windhorst
  • Jakub Zeleny

Externe Organisationen

  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (CAU)
  • Company for Environment and Coast
  • VNU University of Science (VNU-HUS)
  • Universität Greifswald
  • Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
  • Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung (SGN)
  • Universität Duisburg-Essen
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)
  • Leibniz-Institut für Ostseeforschung Warnemünde (IOW)
  • Research Institute Nature and Forest (INBO)
  • Universität Rostock
  • Universität Innsbruck
  • Eurac Research
  • Kenyatta University (KU)
  • Akademie Věd České Republiky (AV ČR)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer106116
FachzeitschriftEcological indicators
Jahrgang112
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Mai 2020

Abstract

In this article, a revised and enlarged version of a qualitative assessment matrix for the appraisal of ecosystem service potentials is introduced. The product is a simple tool for scoring terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types with respect to their abilities to provide provisioning, regulating and cultural ecosystem services as well as indicators of ecosystem state by applying criteria of ecosystem integrity. The methodological steps of matrix development are described, and the emerging expert opinions are illustrated by characterizing different ecosystem types, analysing different ecosystem services and showing the outcomes of linked GIS-based mapping exercises. The applicability of the matrix is demonstrated by some case studies. The related uncertainties are characterized and discussed in context with limitations, arising challenges and conceptual problems. The tool is made available on the internet, and the authors are looking forward to critical checks and proposals for improvement.

Zitieren

Assessing ecosystem service potentials to evaluate terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types in Northern Germany: An expert-based matrix approach. / Müller, Felix; Bicking, Sabine; Ahrendt, Kai et al.
in: Ecological indicators, Jahrgang 112, 106116, 05.2020.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Müller, F, Bicking, S, Ahrendt, K, Bac, DK, Blindow, I, Fuerst, C, Haase, P, Kruse, M, Kruse, T, Ma, L, Perennes, M, Ruljevic, I, Schernewski, G, Schimming, C-G, Schneiders, A, Schubert, H, Schumacher, N, Tappeiner, U, Wangai, P, Windhorst, W & Zeleny, J 2020, 'Assessing ecosystem service potentials to evaluate terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types in Northern Germany: An expert-based matrix approach', Ecological indicators, Jg. 112, 106116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106116
Müller, F., Bicking, S., Ahrendt, K., Bac, D. K., Blindow, I., Fuerst, C., Haase, P., Kruse, M., Kruse, T., Ma, L., Perennes, M., Ruljevic, I., Schernewski, G., Schimming, C.-G., Schneiders, A., Schubert, H., Schumacher, N., Tappeiner, U., Wangai, P., ... Zeleny, J. (2020). Assessing ecosystem service potentials to evaluate terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types in Northern Germany: An expert-based matrix approach. Ecological indicators, 112, Artikel 106116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106116
Download
@article{8c450024eaee44c4897d16e05b89fb7a,
title = "Assessing ecosystem service potentials to evaluate terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types in Northern Germany: An expert-based matrix approach",
abstract = "In this article, a revised and enlarged version of a qualitative assessment matrix for the appraisal of ecosystem service potentials is introduced. The product is a simple tool for scoring terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types with respect to their abilities to provide provisioning, regulating and cultural ecosystem services as well as indicators of ecosystem state by applying criteria of ecosystem integrity. The methodological steps of matrix development are described, and the emerging expert opinions are illustrated by characterizing different ecosystem types, analysing different ecosystem services and showing the outcomes of linked GIS-based mapping exercises. The applicability of the matrix is demonstrated by some case studies. The related uncertainties are characterized and discussed in context with limitations, arising challenges and conceptual problems. The tool is made available on the internet, and the authors are looking forward to critical checks and proposals for improvement.",
keywords = "Ecosystem service potential, Matrix approach, Qualitative ecosystem assessment, Terrestrial ecosystem services, Coastal ecosystem services, Marine ecosystem services",
author = "Felix M{\"u}ller and Sabine Bicking and Kai Ahrendt and Bac, {Dang Kinh} and Irmgard Blindow and Christine Fuerst and Peter Haase and Marion Kruse and Tim Kruse and Liwei Ma and Marie Perennes and Ivana Ruljevic and Gerald Schernewski and Claus-Georg Schimming and Anik Schneiders and Hendrik Schubert and NoteJohanna Schumacher and Ulrike Tappeiner and Peter Wangai and Wilhelm Windhorst and Jakub Zeleny",
note = "Funding Information: This work has been done in the context of the BACOSA II and SECOS II r&d projects, funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research, funding numbers 03F0737A and 03F0738C. Funding Information: The authors are grateful to the additional initiators of the first version of the ecosystem service matrix, Benjamin Burkhard (Hannover) and Franziska Kroll (Frankfurt). We also thank the collaborators of the Stoll et al.- paper, supporting colleagues and acknowledged persons who provided important comments on older versions, for very thoughtful feed backs: Mihai Adamescu (Bucharest), Algirdas Augustaitis (Kaunas), Cornelia Baessler (Halle), Uta Berger (Dresden), Francisco J. Bonet (Granada), Kremena Burkhard (Hannover), Maria Laura Carranza (Pesche), Constantin Cazacu (Bucharest), Georgia L. Cosor (Bucharest), Ricardo D{\'i}az-Delgado (Sevilla), Mark Frenzel (Halle), Ulf Grandin (Uppsala), Heikki H{\"a}m{\"a}l{\"a}inen (Jyv{\"a}skyl{\"a}), Timo Kumpula (Joensuu), Rob Loke (Den Hoorn), J{\"o}rg M{\"u}ller (Grafenau), Stoyan Nedkov (Sofia), Angela Stanisci (Pesche), Tomasz Staszewski (Katowice), Stefan Stoll (Trier), Ari Tanskanen (Joensuu), and Petteri Vihervaara (Helsinki). The authors furthermore are extremely happy that the following colleagues have provided significant comments, critics and ideas on the recent matrix configuration: Harald Asmus (List), Olaf Bastian (Dresden), Manfred B{\"o}lter (Kiel), Angel Borja (Leioa), Markus Erhard (Copenhagen), Elli Groner (Eilot), Karsten Grunewald (Dresden), Roy Haines-Young (Nottingham), Ying Hou (Beijing), Miguel Inacio (Rostock), Sonja J{\"a}ning (Berlin), Jens Kiesel (Kiel), Laura Mononen (Joensuu), Bertram Ostendorf (Adelaide), Matthias Pfannerstill (Kiel), Christian Porsche (Rostock), Marion Potschin (Nottingham), Joao Rodriguez (Lisboa), Werner Rolf (M{\"u}nchen), Silvia Rova (Venice), Gerals Schernewski (Rostock), Uta Schirpke (Bozen), Heiko Schm{\"u}ser (Kiel), Joachim Schrautzer (Kiel), Winfried Schr{\"o}der (Vechta), Horst Sterr (Kiel), Meirong Su (Beijing), Ralf-Uwe Syrbe (Dresden), Ulrich Walz (Dresden), and Naicheng Wu (Aarhus). Additionally there has been permanent support from the colleagues of the BACOSA and SECOS projects, Martin Benkenstein (Rostock), Maximilian Berthold (Rostock), Uwe Buczko (Rostock), Ren{\'e} Friedland (Warnem{\"u}nde), Gerald Jurasinski (Rostock), Friederike Kunz (Warnem{\"u}nde), Konrad Ott (Kiel), Martin Paar (Greifswald), Katharina Poser (Rostock), Johanna Schumacher (Warnemuende), and Rhena Schumann (Rostock). This work has been done in the context of the BACOSA II and SECOS II r&d projects, funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research, funding numbers 03F0737A and 03F0738C. The paper has been worked in intensive cooperation. Conceptualization was made as a continuous small group result, while all authors have contributed in the matrix creation and quantification as well as the critical review. The text was worked out by the whole team.",
year = "2020",
month = may,
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106116",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
journal = "Ecological indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing ecosystem service potentials to evaluate terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types in Northern Germany

T2 - An expert-based matrix approach

AU - Müller, Felix

AU - Bicking, Sabine

AU - Ahrendt, Kai

AU - Bac, Dang Kinh

AU - Blindow, Irmgard

AU - Fuerst, Christine

AU - Haase, Peter

AU - Kruse, Marion

AU - Kruse, Tim

AU - Ma, Liwei

AU - Perennes, Marie

AU - Ruljevic, Ivana

AU - Schernewski, Gerald

AU - Schimming, Claus-Georg

AU - Schneiders, Anik

AU - Schubert, Hendrik

AU - Schumacher, NoteJohanna

AU - Tappeiner, Ulrike

AU - Wangai, Peter

AU - Windhorst, Wilhelm

AU - Zeleny, Jakub

N1 - Funding Information: This work has been done in the context of the BACOSA II and SECOS II r&d projects, funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research, funding numbers 03F0737A and 03F0738C. Funding Information: The authors are grateful to the additional initiators of the first version of the ecosystem service matrix, Benjamin Burkhard (Hannover) and Franziska Kroll (Frankfurt). We also thank the collaborators of the Stoll et al.- paper, supporting colleagues and acknowledged persons who provided important comments on older versions, for very thoughtful feed backs: Mihai Adamescu (Bucharest), Algirdas Augustaitis (Kaunas), Cornelia Baessler (Halle), Uta Berger (Dresden), Francisco J. Bonet (Granada), Kremena Burkhard (Hannover), Maria Laura Carranza (Pesche), Constantin Cazacu (Bucharest), Georgia L. Cosor (Bucharest), Ricardo Díaz-Delgado (Sevilla), Mark Frenzel (Halle), Ulf Grandin (Uppsala), Heikki Hämäläinen (Jyväskylä), Timo Kumpula (Joensuu), Rob Loke (Den Hoorn), Jörg Müller (Grafenau), Stoyan Nedkov (Sofia), Angela Stanisci (Pesche), Tomasz Staszewski (Katowice), Stefan Stoll (Trier), Ari Tanskanen (Joensuu), and Petteri Vihervaara (Helsinki). The authors furthermore are extremely happy that the following colleagues have provided significant comments, critics and ideas on the recent matrix configuration: Harald Asmus (List), Olaf Bastian (Dresden), Manfred Bölter (Kiel), Angel Borja (Leioa), Markus Erhard (Copenhagen), Elli Groner (Eilot), Karsten Grunewald (Dresden), Roy Haines-Young (Nottingham), Ying Hou (Beijing), Miguel Inacio (Rostock), Sonja Jäning (Berlin), Jens Kiesel (Kiel), Laura Mononen (Joensuu), Bertram Ostendorf (Adelaide), Matthias Pfannerstill (Kiel), Christian Porsche (Rostock), Marion Potschin (Nottingham), Joao Rodriguez (Lisboa), Werner Rolf (München), Silvia Rova (Venice), Gerals Schernewski (Rostock), Uta Schirpke (Bozen), Heiko Schmüser (Kiel), Joachim Schrautzer (Kiel), Winfried Schröder (Vechta), Horst Sterr (Kiel), Meirong Su (Beijing), Ralf-Uwe Syrbe (Dresden), Ulrich Walz (Dresden), and Naicheng Wu (Aarhus). Additionally there has been permanent support from the colleagues of the BACOSA and SECOS projects, Martin Benkenstein (Rostock), Maximilian Berthold (Rostock), Uwe Buczko (Rostock), René Friedland (Warnemünde), Gerald Jurasinski (Rostock), Friederike Kunz (Warnemünde), Konrad Ott (Kiel), Martin Paar (Greifswald), Katharina Poser (Rostock), Johanna Schumacher (Warnemuende), and Rhena Schumann (Rostock). This work has been done in the context of the BACOSA II and SECOS II r&d projects, funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research, funding numbers 03F0737A and 03F0738C. The paper has been worked in intensive cooperation. Conceptualization was made as a continuous small group result, while all authors have contributed in the matrix creation and quantification as well as the critical review. The text was worked out by the whole team.

PY - 2020/5

Y1 - 2020/5

N2 - In this article, a revised and enlarged version of a qualitative assessment matrix for the appraisal of ecosystem service potentials is introduced. The product is a simple tool for scoring terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types with respect to their abilities to provide provisioning, regulating and cultural ecosystem services as well as indicators of ecosystem state by applying criteria of ecosystem integrity. The methodological steps of matrix development are described, and the emerging expert opinions are illustrated by characterizing different ecosystem types, analysing different ecosystem services and showing the outcomes of linked GIS-based mapping exercises. The applicability of the matrix is demonstrated by some case studies. The related uncertainties are characterized and discussed in context with limitations, arising challenges and conceptual problems. The tool is made available on the internet, and the authors are looking forward to critical checks and proposals for improvement.

AB - In this article, a revised and enlarged version of a qualitative assessment matrix for the appraisal of ecosystem service potentials is introduced. The product is a simple tool for scoring terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types with respect to their abilities to provide provisioning, regulating and cultural ecosystem services as well as indicators of ecosystem state by applying criteria of ecosystem integrity. The methodological steps of matrix development are described, and the emerging expert opinions are illustrated by characterizing different ecosystem types, analysing different ecosystem services and showing the outcomes of linked GIS-based mapping exercises. The applicability of the matrix is demonstrated by some case studies. The related uncertainties are characterized and discussed in context with limitations, arising challenges and conceptual problems. The tool is made available on the internet, and the authors are looking forward to critical checks and proposals for improvement.

KW - Ecosystem service potential

KW - Matrix approach

KW - Qualitative ecosystem assessment

KW - Terrestrial ecosystem services

KW - Coastal ecosystem services

KW - Marine ecosystem services

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078964640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106116

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106116

M3 - Article

VL - 112

JO - Ecological indicators

JF - Ecological indicators

SN - 1470-160X

M1 - 106116

ER -

Von denselben Autoren