Archaea box C/D enzymes methylate two distinct substrate rRNA sequences with different efficiency

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Andrea Graziadei
  • Pawel Masiewicz
  • Audrone Lapinaite
  • Teresa Carlomagno

Externe Organisationen

  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL)
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Infektionsforschung GmbH (HZI)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)764-772
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftRNA
Jahrgang22
Ausgabenummer5
Frühes Online-Datum29 Feb. 2016
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Mai 2016

Abstract

RNA modifications confer complexity to the 4-nucleotide polymer; nevertheless, their exact function is mostly unknown. rRNA 2′-O-ribose methylation concentrates to ribosome functional sites and is important for ribosome biogenesis. The methyl group is transferred to rRNA by the box C/D RNPs: The rRNA sequence to be methylated is recognized by a complementary sequence on the guide RNA, which is part of the enzyme. In contrast to their eukaryotic homologs, archaeal box C/D enzymes can be assembled in vitro and are used to study the mechanism of 2′-O-ribose methylation. In Archaea, each guide RNA directs methylation to two distinct rRNA sequences, posing the question whether this dual architecture of the enzyme has a regulatory role. Here we use methylation assays and low-resolution structural analysis with small-angle X-ray scattering to study the methylation reaction guided by the sR26 guide RNA from Pyrococcus furiosus. We find that the methylation efficacy at sites D and D′ differ substantially, with substrate D′ turning over more efficiently than substrate D. This observation correlates well with structural data: The scattering profile of the box C/D RNP half-loaded with substrate D′ is similar to that of the holo complex, which has the highest activity. Unexpectedly, the guide RNA secondary structure is not responsible for the functional difference at the D and D′ sites. Instead, this difference is recapitulated by the nature of the first base pair of the guide-substrate duplex. We suggest that substrate turnover may occur through a zip mechanism that initiates at the 5′-end of the product.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Archaea box C/D enzymes methylate two distinct substrate rRNA sequences with different efficiency. / Graziadei, Andrea; Masiewicz, Pawel; Lapinaite, Audrone et al.
in: RNA, Jahrgang 22, Nr. 5, 05.2016, S. 764-772.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Graziadei A, Masiewicz P, Lapinaite A, Carlomagno T. Archaea box C/D enzymes methylate two distinct substrate rRNA sequences with different efficiency. RNA. 2016 Mai;22(5):764-772. Epub 2016 Feb 29. doi: 10.1261/rna.054320.115, 10.15488/3838
Graziadei, Andrea ; Masiewicz, Pawel ; Lapinaite, Audrone et al. / Archaea box C/D enzymes methylate two distinct substrate rRNA sequences with different efficiency. in: RNA. 2016 ; Jahrgang 22, Nr. 5. S. 764-772.
Download
@article{e0b19c7a3a854d768c9b787d5fc35b6a,
title = "Archaea box C/D enzymes methylate two distinct substrate rRNA sequences with different efficiency",
abstract = "RNA modifications confer complexity to the 4-nucleotide polymer; nevertheless, their exact function is mostly unknown. rRNA 2′-O-ribose methylation concentrates to ribosome functional sites and is important for ribosome biogenesis. The methyl group is transferred to rRNA by the box C/D RNPs: The rRNA sequence to be methylated is recognized by a complementary sequence on the guide RNA, which is part of the enzyme. In contrast to their eukaryotic homologs, archaeal box C/D enzymes can be assembled in vitro and are used to study the mechanism of 2′-O-ribose methylation. In Archaea, each guide RNA directs methylation to two distinct rRNA sequences, posing the question whether this dual architecture of the enzyme has a regulatory role. Here we use methylation assays and low-resolution structural analysis with small-angle X-ray scattering to study the methylation reaction guided by the sR26 guide RNA from Pyrococcus furiosus. We find that the methylation efficacy at sites D and D′ differ substantially, with substrate D′ turning over more efficiently than substrate D. This observation correlates well with structural data: The scattering profile of the box C/D RNP half-loaded with substrate D′ is similar to that of the holo complex, which has the highest activity. Unexpectedly, the guide RNA secondary structure is not responsible for the functional difference at the D and D′ sites. Instead, this difference is recapitulated by the nature of the first base pair of the guide-substrate duplex. We suggest that substrate turnover may occur through a zip mechanism that initiates at the 5′-end of the product.",
keywords = "2′-O methylation, Box C/D RNP, Regulatory mechanism, RNA modification",
author = "Andrea Graziadei and Pawel Masiewicz and Audrone Lapinaite and Teresa Carlomagno",
note = "Funding Information: This work was supported by DFG grant CA294/3-2, by EU FP7 ITN project RNPnet (contract number 289007), and by the EMBL. For the SAXS experiments we thank the ESRF, BAG MX1695.",
year = "2016",
month = may,
doi = "10.1261/rna.054320.115",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "764--772",
journal = "RNA",
issn = "1355-8382",
publisher = "Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press",
number = "5",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Archaea box C/D enzymes methylate two distinct substrate rRNA sequences with different efficiency

AU - Graziadei, Andrea

AU - Masiewicz, Pawel

AU - Lapinaite, Audrone

AU - Carlomagno, Teresa

N1 - Funding Information: This work was supported by DFG grant CA294/3-2, by EU FP7 ITN project RNPnet (contract number 289007), and by the EMBL. For the SAXS experiments we thank the ESRF, BAG MX1695.

PY - 2016/5

Y1 - 2016/5

N2 - RNA modifications confer complexity to the 4-nucleotide polymer; nevertheless, their exact function is mostly unknown. rRNA 2′-O-ribose methylation concentrates to ribosome functional sites and is important for ribosome biogenesis. The methyl group is transferred to rRNA by the box C/D RNPs: The rRNA sequence to be methylated is recognized by a complementary sequence on the guide RNA, which is part of the enzyme. In contrast to their eukaryotic homologs, archaeal box C/D enzymes can be assembled in vitro and are used to study the mechanism of 2′-O-ribose methylation. In Archaea, each guide RNA directs methylation to two distinct rRNA sequences, posing the question whether this dual architecture of the enzyme has a regulatory role. Here we use methylation assays and low-resolution structural analysis with small-angle X-ray scattering to study the methylation reaction guided by the sR26 guide RNA from Pyrococcus furiosus. We find that the methylation efficacy at sites D and D′ differ substantially, with substrate D′ turning over more efficiently than substrate D. This observation correlates well with structural data: The scattering profile of the box C/D RNP half-loaded with substrate D′ is similar to that of the holo complex, which has the highest activity. Unexpectedly, the guide RNA secondary structure is not responsible for the functional difference at the D and D′ sites. Instead, this difference is recapitulated by the nature of the first base pair of the guide-substrate duplex. We suggest that substrate turnover may occur through a zip mechanism that initiates at the 5′-end of the product.

AB - RNA modifications confer complexity to the 4-nucleotide polymer; nevertheless, their exact function is mostly unknown. rRNA 2′-O-ribose methylation concentrates to ribosome functional sites and is important for ribosome biogenesis. The methyl group is transferred to rRNA by the box C/D RNPs: The rRNA sequence to be methylated is recognized by a complementary sequence on the guide RNA, which is part of the enzyme. In contrast to their eukaryotic homologs, archaeal box C/D enzymes can be assembled in vitro and are used to study the mechanism of 2′-O-ribose methylation. In Archaea, each guide RNA directs methylation to two distinct rRNA sequences, posing the question whether this dual architecture of the enzyme has a regulatory role. Here we use methylation assays and low-resolution structural analysis with small-angle X-ray scattering to study the methylation reaction guided by the sR26 guide RNA from Pyrococcus furiosus. We find that the methylation efficacy at sites D and D′ differ substantially, with substrate D′ turning over more efficiently than substrate D. This observation correlates well with structural data: The scattering profile of the box C/D RNP half-loaded with substrate D′ is similar to that of the holo complex, which has the highest activity. Unexpectedly, the guide RNA secondary structure is not responsible for the functional difference at the D and D′ sites. Instead, this difference is recapitulated by the nature of the first base pair of the guide-substrate duplex. We suggest that substrate turnover may occur through a zip mechanism that initiates at the 5′-end of the product.

KW - 2′-O methylation

KW - Box C/D RNP

KW - Regulatory mechanism

KW - RNA modification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964461180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1261/rna.054320.115

DO - 10.1261/rna.054320.115

M3 - Article

C2 - 26925607

AN - SCOPUS:84964461180

VL - 22

SP - 764

EP - 772

JO - RNA

JF - RNA

SN - 1355-8382

IS - 5

ER -