Arbeitsplatzexport durch Offshoring

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Ingo Liefner
  • Dominik Schmid

Externe Organisationen

  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

Titel in ÜbersetzungJob export through..Offshoring"? Effects of economic integration in North America
OriginalspracheDeutsch
Seiten (von - bis)20-25
Seitenumfang6
FachzeitschriftGeographische Rundschau
Jahrgang61
Ausgabenummer6
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Juni 2009
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

The NAFTA agreement was meant to stimulate trade and economic integration among the North American countries USA, Canada, and Mexico. However, the economic integration of countries with different wage structures also induces a movement of jobs. NAFTA-induced job losses in the U.S. have been a key argument against NAFTA since the early stages of political debate. This paper recalls the fundamental economic forces that lead to an off-shoring of industrial activities and jobs. On a theoretical base, the pros and cons are evaluated. Further, the regional structure of NAFTA-induced job losses is analyzed. As a correlate to the shift of industrial activities away from the U.S., Mexico's maquiladora industries have witnessed dynamic growth. Within the U.S., job losses have affected many states, in particular in the South. However, the geography of job losses seems to be less important than its connection with laborers' educational background. It is predominantly low-skilled jobs that have been lost in U.S. industry. These jobs were subject to competition from Mexican low-cost labor. On the other hand, off-shoring has helped to sustain competitiveness of U.S. industry as a whole, and secure high- skilled jobs.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Arbeitsplatzexport durch Offshoring. / Liefner, Ingo; Schmid, Dominik.
in: Geographische Rundschau, Jahrgang 61, Nr. 6, 06.2009, S. 20-25.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Liefner, I & Schmid, D 2009, 'Arbeitsplatzexport durch Offshoring', Geographische Rundschau, Jg. 61, Nr. 6, S. 20-25.
Liefner, I., & Schmid, D. (2009). Arbeitsplatzexport durch Offshoring. Geographische Rundschau, 61(6), 20-25.
Liefner I, Schmid D. Arbeitsplatzexport durch Offshoring. Geographische Rundschau. 2009 Jun;61(6):20-25.
Liefner, Ingo ; Schmid, Dominik. / Arbeitsplatzexport durch Offshoring. in: Geographische Rundschau. 2009 ; Jahrgang 61, Nr. 6. S. 20-25.
Download
@article{7c67ef9360014962bcff8e9957a0a649,
title = "Arbeitsplatzexport durch Offshoring",
abstract = "The NAFTA agreement was meant to stimulate trade and economic integration among the North American countries USA, Canada, and Mexico. However, the economic integration of countries with different wage structures also induces a movement of jobs. NAFTA-induced job losses in the U.S. have been a key argument against NAFTA since the early stages of political debate. This paper recalls the fundamental economic forces that lead to an off-shoring of industrial activities and jobs. On a theoretical base, the pros and cons are evaluated. Further, the regional structure of NAFTA-induced job losses is analyzed. As a correlate to the shift of industrial activities away from the U.S., Mexico's maquiladora industries have witnessed dynamic growth. Within the U.S., job losses have affected many states, in particular in the South. However, the geography of job losses seems to be less important than its connection with laborers' educational background. It is predominantly low-skilled jobs that have been lost in U.S. industry. These jobs were subject to competition from Mexican low-cost labor. On the other hand, off-shoring has helped to sustain competitiveness of U.S. industry as a whole, and secure high- skilled jobs.",
author = "Ingo Liefner and Dominik Schmid",
year = "2009",
month = jun,
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "61",
pages = "20--25",
number = "6",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arbeitsplatzexport durch Offshoring

AU - Liefner, Ingo

AU - Schmid, Dominik

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - The NAFTA agreement was meant to stimulate trade and economic integration among the North American countries USA, Canada, and Mexico. However, the economic integration of countries with different wage structures also induces a movement of jobs. NAFTA-induced job losses in the U.S. have been a key argument against NAFTA since the early stages of political debate. This paper recalls the fundamental economic forces that lead to an off-shoring of industrial activities and jobs. On a theoretical base, the pros and cons are evaluated. Further, the regional structure of NAFTA-induced job losses is analyzed. As a correlate to the shift of industrial activities away from the U.S., Mexico's maquiladora industries have witnessed dynamic growth. Within the U.S., job losses have affected many states, in particular in the South. However, the geography of job losses seems to be less important than its connection with laborers' educational background. It is predominantly low-skilled jobs that have been lost in U.S. industry. These jobs were subject to competition from Mexican low-cost labor. On the other hand, off-shoring has helped to sustain competitiveness of U.S. industry as a whole, and secure high- skilled jobs.

AB - The NAFTA agreement was meant to stimulate trade and economic integration among the North American countries USA, Canada, and Mexico. However, the economic integration of countries with different wage structures also induces a movement of jobs. NAFTA-induced job losses in the U.S. have been a key argument against NAFTA since the early stages of political debate. This paper recalls the fundamental economic forces that lead to an off-shoring of industrial activities and jobs. On a theoretical base, the pros and cons are evaluated. Further, the regional structure of NAFTA-induced job losses is analyzed. As a correlate to the shift of industrial activities away from the U.S., Mexico's maquiladora industries have witnessed dynamic growth. Within the U.S., job losses have affected many states, in particular in the South. However, the geography of job losses seems to be less important than its connection with laborers' educational background. It is predominantly low-skilled jobs that have been lost in U.S. industry. These jobs were subject to competition from Mexican low-cost labor. On the other hand, off-shoring has helped to sustain competitiveness of U.S. industry as a whole, and secure high- skilled jobs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650089588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Artikel

AN - SCOPUS:67650089588

VL - 61

SP - 20

EP - 25

JO - Geographische Rundschau

JF - Geographische Rundschau

SN - 0016-7460

IS - 6

ER -