Arbeitsökonomische Forschung: Theoretisch und empirisch fundiert, ergebnisoffen – eine Replik auf „Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt“

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Bernd Fitzenberger
  • Olaf Hübler
  • Kornelius Kraft

Externe Organisationen

  • Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
  • Technische Universität Dortmund
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

Titel in ÜbersetzungResearch in labour economics: theoretically and empirically sound, without bias or preconceived conclusions – a reply to “The tale of the inflexible German labour market”
OriginalspracheMehrere Sprachen
Seiten (von - bis)99-106
Seitenumfang8
FachzeitschriftZeitschrift fur Arbeitsmarktforschung
Jahrgang42
Ausgabenummer1
Frühes Online-Datum28 März 2009
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Mai 2009

Abstract

In his article “The tale of the inflexible German labour market” (“Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt”) in this issue of the Journal for Labour Market Research (ZAF) Werner Sengenberger criticises our introductory paper “Potentials for flexibility in heterogeneous labour markets – an introduction”, which was published in issue 2/3 of the ZAF in 2008 (Fitzenberger et al. 2008). In this reply, we comment on the accusations expressed. Our introductory paper was written as an introduction to the research programme ``Flexibility in Heterogeneous Labour Markets”, which has been funded by the DFG since 2004, and refers explicitly to the status of literature on labour economics prior to 2003. This explains some of the misunderstandings and errors in Sengenberger's reception of our paper. We reject the accusations of theoretical bias and a lack of knowledge of the literature. The reply explains key developments in labour economics research and emphasises their lack of bias and preconceived conclusions. In addition the paper includes a summary of some important findings from current research in labour economics in Germany both in the context of the DFG research programme and outside it.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Arbeitsökonomische Forschung: Theoretisch und empirisch fundiert, ergebnisoffen – eine Replik auf „Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt“. / Fitzenberger, Bernd; Hübler, Olaf; Kraft, Kornelius.
in: Zeitschrift fur Arbeitsmarktforschung, Jahrgang 42, Nr. 1, 05.2009, S. 99-106.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Fitzenberger B, Hübler O, Kraft K. Arbeitsökonomische Forschung: Theoretisch und empirisch fundiert, ergebnisoffen – eine Replik auf „Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt“. Zeitschrift fur Arbeitsmarktforschung. 2009 Mai;42(1):99-106. Epub 2009 Mär 28. doi: 10.1007/s12651-009-0012-z
Fitzenberger, Bernd ; Hübler, Olaf ; Kraft, Kornelius. / Arbeitsökonomische Forschung : Theoretisch und empirisch fundiert, ergebnisoffen – eine Replik auf „Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt“. in: Zeitschrift fur Arbeitsmarktforschung. 2009 ; Jahrgang 42, Nr. 1. S. 99-106.
Download
@article{19aacaec45c245529b33b1aa4b2c180c,
title = "Arbeits{\"o}konomische Forschung: Theoretisch und empirisch fundiert, ergebnisoffen – eine Replik auf „Die M{\"a}r vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt“",
abstract = "In his article “The tale of the inflexible German labour market” (“Die M{\"a}r vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt”) in this issue of the Journal for Labour Market Research (ZAF) Werner Sengenberger criticises our introductory paper “Potentials for flexibility in heterogeneous labour markets – an introduction”, which was published in issue 2/3 of the ZAF in 2008 (Fitzenberger et al. 2008). In this reply, we comment on the accusations expressed. Our introductory paper was written as an introduction to the research programme ``Flexibility in Heterogeneous Labour Markets”, which has been funded by the DFG since 2004, and refers explicitly to the status of literature on labour economics prior to 2003. This explains some of the misunderstandings and errors in Sengenberger's reception of our paper. We reject the accusations of theoretical bias and a lack of knowledge of the literature. The reply explains key developments in labour economics research and emphasises their lack of bias and preconceived conclusions. In addition the paper includes a summary of some important findings from current research in labour economics in Germany both in the context of the DFG research programme and outside it.",
author = "Bernd Fitzenberger and Olaf H{\"u}bler and Kornelius Kraft",
note = "Funding Information: Abstract In his article “The tale of the inflexible German labour market” (“Die M{\"a}r vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt”) in this issue of the Journal for Labour Market Research (ZAF) Werner Sengenberger criticises our introductory paper “Potentials for flexibility in heterogeneous labour markets – an introduction”, which was published in issue 2/3 of the ZAF in 2008 (Fitzenberger et al. 2008). In this reply, we comment on the accusations expressed. Our introductory paper was written as an introduction to the research programme “Flexibility in Heterogeneous Labour Markets”, which has been funded by the DFG since 2004, and refers explicitly to the status of literature on labour economics prior to 2003. This explains some of the misunderstandings and errors in Sengenberger{\textquoteright}s reception of our paper. We reject the accusations of theoretical bias and a lack of knowledge of the literature. The reply explains key developments in labour economics research and emphasises their lack of bias and preconceived conclusions. In addition the paper includes a summary of some important findings from current research in labour economics in Germany both in the context of the DFG research programme and outside it. ",
year = "2009",
month = may,
doi = "10.1007/s12651-009-0012-z",
language = "Multiple languages",
volume = "42",
pages = "99--106",
number = "1",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arbeitsökonomische Forschung

T2 - Theoretisch und empirisch fundiert, ergebnisoffen – eine Replik auf „Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt“

AU - Fitzenberger, Bernd

AU - Hübler, Olaf

AU - Kraft, Kornelius

N1 - Funding Information: Abstract In his article “The tale of the inflexible German labour market” (“Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt”) in this issue of the Journal for Labour Market Research (ZAF) Werner Sengenberger criticises our introductory paper “Potentials for flexibility in heterogeneous labour markets – an introduction”, which was published in issue 2/3 of the ZAF in 2008 (Fitzenberger et al. 2008). In this reply, we comment on the accusations expressed. Our introductory paper was written as an introduction to the research programme “Flexibility in Heterogeneous Labour Markets”, which has been funded by the DFG since 2004, and refers explicitly to the status of literature on labour economics prior to 2003. This explains some of the misunderstandings and errors in Sengenberger’s reception of our paper. We reject the accusations of theoretical bias and a lack of knowledge of the literature. The reply explains key developments in labour economics research and emphasises their lack of bias and preconceived conclusions. In addition the paper includes a summary of some important findings from current research in labour economics in Germany both in the context of the DFG research programme and outside it.

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - In his article “The tale of the inflexible German labour market” (“Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt”) in this issue of the Journal for Labour Market Research (ZAF) Werner Sengenberger criticises our introductory paper “Potentials for flexibility in heterogeneous labour markets – an introduction”, which was published in issue 2/3 of the ZAF in 2008 (Fitzenberger et al. 2008). In this reply, we comment on the accusations expressed. Our introductory paper was written as an introduction to the research programme ``Flexibility in Heterogeneous Labour Markets”, which has been funded by the DFG since 2004, and refers explicitly to the status of literature on labour economics prior to 2003. This explains some of the misunderstandings and errors in Sengenberger's reception of our paper. We reject the accusations of theoretical bias and a lack of knowledge of the literature. The reply explains key developments in labour economics research and emphasises their lack of bias and preconceived conclusions. In addition the paper includes a summary of some important findings from current research in labour economics in Germany both in the context of the DFG research programme and outside it.

AB - In his article “The tale of the inflexible German labour market” (“Die Mär vom starren deutschen Arbeitsmarkt”) in this issue of the Journal for Labour Market Research (ZAF) Werner Sengenberger criticises our introductory paper “Potentials for flexibility in heterogeneous labour markets – an introduction”, which was published in issue 2/3 of the ZAF in 2008 (Fitzenberger et al. 2008). In this reply, we comment on the accusations expressed. Our introductory paper was written as an introduction to the research programme ``Flexibility in Heterogeneous Labour Markets”, which has been funded by the DFG since 2004, and refers explicitly to the status of literature on labour economics prior to 2003. This explains some of the misunderstandings and errors in Sengenberger's reception of our paper. We reject the accusations of theoretical bias and a lack of knowledge of the literature. The reply explains key developments in labour economics research and emphasises their lack of bias and preconceived conclusions. In addition the paper includes a summary of some important findings from current research in labour economics in Germany both in the context of the DFG research programme and outside it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975296984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12651-009-0012-z

DO - 10.1007/s12651-009-0012-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84975296984

VL - 42

SP - 99

EP - 106

JO - Zeitschrift fur Arbeitsmarktforschung

JF - Zeitschrift fur Arbeitsmarktforschung

SN - 1867-8343

IS - 1

ER -