Antecedents, Consequences, and Mechanisms: On the Longitudinal Interplay Between Academic Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Michael Dufner
  • Anne K. Reitz
  • Lysann Zander

Externe Organisationen

  • Universität Leipzig
  • Columbia University
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU Berlin)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (FU Berlin)
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)511-522
Seitenumfang12
FachzeitschriftJournal of personality
Jahrgang83
Ausgabenummer5
Frühes Online-Datum2 Sept. 2014
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Okt. 2015
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

We investigated the reciprocal associations between academic self-enhancement and key indicators of intra- and interpersonal adjustment as well as the role of self-esteem as a mediator. This longitudinal study involved three assessments in a sample of 709 German children and adolescents (Mage=11.83; 54% female) over the course of one academic year. We assessed self-reported subjective well-being as an indicator of intrapersonal adjustment and peer-reported popularity as an indicator of interpersonal adjustment. We computed cross-lagged and longitudinal mediational analyses. Academic self-enhancement prospectively predicted high subsequent well-being and popularity. Vice versa, well-being and popularity prospectively predicted high subsequent levels of self-enhancement. High self-esteem mediated the longitudinal associations between self-enhancement and well-being in both directions, but not the links between self-enhancement and popularity. Self-enhancement and adjustment are bidirectionally linked: Self-enhancement entails intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits; at the same time, adjustment in both domains fosters self-enhancement. In terms of intrapersonal, but not interpersonal adjustment, self-esteem seems to serve as a linchpin, accounting for all longitudinal associations. Furthermore, we present evidence indicating that self-enhancement indicators that are based on difference scores (instead of residuals) are problematic and might have led to negatively biased results in the literature.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Antecedents, Consequences, and Mechanisms: On the Longitudinal Interplay Between Academic Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment. / Dufner, Michael; Reitz, Anne K.; Zander, Lysann.
in: Journal of personality, Jahrgang 83, Nr. 5, 01.10.2015, S. 511-522.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Download
@article{683ae3c2a2754838a4a81f05963e9d5e,
title = "Antecedents, Consequences, and Mechanisms: On the Longitudinal Interplay Between Academic Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment",
abstract = "We investigated the reciprocal associations between academic self-enhancement and key indicators of intra- and interpersonal adjustment as well as the role of self-esteem as a mediator. This longitudinal study involved three assessments in a sample of 709 German children and adolescents (Mage=11.83; 54% female) over the course of one academic year. We assessed self-reported subjective well-being as an indicator of intrapersonal adjustment and peer-reported popularity as an indicator of interpersonal adjustment. We computed cross-lagged and longitudinal mediational analyses. Academic self-enhancement prospectively predicted high subsequent well-being and popularity. Vice versa, well-being and popularity prospectively predicted high subsequent levels of self-enhancement. High self-esteem mediated the longitudinal associations between self-enhancement and well-being in both directions, but not the links between self-enhancement and popularity. Self-enhancement and adjustment are bidirectionally linked: Self-enhancement entails intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits; at the same time, adjustment in both domains fosters self-enhancement. In terms of intrapersonal, but not interpersonal adjustment, self-esteem seems to serve as a linchpin, accounting for all longitudinal associations. Furthermore, we present evidence indicating that self-enhancement indicators that are based on difference scores (instead of residuals) are problematic and might have led to negatively biased results in the literature.",
author = "Michael Dufner and Reitz, {Anne K.} and Lysann Zander",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jopy.12128",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "511--522",
journal = "Journal of personality",
issn = "0022-3506",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antecedents, Consequences, and Mechanisms

T2 - On the Longitudinal Interplay Between Academic Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment

AU - Dufner, Michael

AU - Reitz, Anne K.

AU - Zander, Lysann

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - We investigated the reciprocal associations between academic self-enhancement and key indicators of intra- and interpersonal adjustment as well as the role of self-esteem as a mediator. This longitudinal study involved three assessments in a sample of 709 German children and adolescents (Mage=11.83; 54% female) over the course of one academic year. We assessed self-reported subjective well-being as an indicator of intrapersonal adjustment and peer-reported popularity as an indicator of interpersonal adjustment. We computed cross-lagged and longitudinal mediational analyses. Academic self-enhancement prospectively predicted high subsequent well-being and popularity. Vice versa, well-being and popularity prospectively predicted high subsequent levels of self-enhancement. High self-esteem mediated the longitudinal associations between self-enhancement and well-being in both directions, but not the links between self-enhancement and popularity. Self-enhancement and adjustment are bidirectionally linked: Self-enhancement entails intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits; at the same time, adjustment in both domains fosters self-enhancement. In terms of intrapersonal, but not interpersonal adjustment, self-esteem seems to serve as a linchpin, accounting for all longitudinal associations. Furthermore, we present evidence indicating that self-enhancement indicators that are based on difference scores (instead of residuals) are problematic and might have led to negatively biased results in the literature.

AB - We investigated the reciprocal associations between academic self-enhancement and key indicators of intra- and interpersonal adjustment as well as the role of self-esteem as a mediator. This longitudinal study involved three assessments in a sample of 709 German children and adolescents (Mage=11.83; 54% female) over the course of one academic year. We assessed self-reported subjective well-being as an indicator of intrapersonal adjustment and peer-reported popularity as an indicator of interpersonal adjustment. We computed cross-lagged and longitudinal mediational analyses. Academic self-enhancement prospectively predicted high subsequent well-being and popularity. Vice versa, well-being and popularity prospectively predicted high subsequent levels of self-enhancement. High self-esteem mediated the longitudinal associations between self-enhancement and well-being in both directions, but not the links between self-enhancement and popularity. Self-enhancement and adjustment are bidirectionally linked: Self-enhancement entails intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits; at the same time, adjustment in both domains fosters self-enhancement. In terms of intrapersonal, but not interpersonal adjustment, self-esteem seems to serve as a linchpin, accounting for all longitudinal associations. Furthermore, we present evidence indicating that self-enhancement indicators that are based on difference scores (instead of residuals) are problematic and might have led to negatively biased results in the literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941002207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jopy.12128

DO - 10.1111/jopy.12128

M3 - Article

C2 - 25181603

AN - SCOPUS:84941002207

VL - 83

SP - 511

EP - 522

JO - Journal of personality

JF - Journal of personality

SN - 0022-3506

IS - 5

ER -