Analyzing Theories in the Frame Model

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Stephan Kornmesser
  • Gerhard Schurz

Externe Organisationen

  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
  • Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1313-1346
Seitenumfang34
FachzeitschriftErkenntnis
Jahrgang85
Ausgabenummer6
Frühes Online-Datum8 Nov. 2018
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Dez. 2020
Extern publiziertJa

Abstract

The frame model was developed in cognitive psychology and imported into the philosophy of science in order to provide representations of scientific concepts and conceptual taxonomies. The aim of this article is to show that beside the representation of scientific concepts the frame model is an efficient instrument to represent and analyze scientific theories. That is, we aim to establish the frame model as a representation tool for the structure of theories within the philosophy of science. For this, we will develop the notion of a theory frame and distinguish between theory frames for qualitative theories in which scientific measurement is based on nominal scales and theory frames for quantitative theories in which measurement is based on ratio scales. In three case studies, we will apply frames to a psychological, a linguistic, and a physical theory, thereby showing that the frame model is a powerful and intuitively accessible instrument to analyze the laws of scientific theories, the determination of theoretical concepts, the explanatory role of theoretical concepts, the abductive introduction of a new theoretical concept, the distinction between the core and the periphery of a theory, the diachronic development of a theory, and the distinction between qualitative and quantitative scientific concepts. Finally, we will provide a comparison to the structuralist view of theories, one of the most elaborated and applied models of theory representation.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

Analyzing Theories in the Frame Model. / Kornmesser, Stephan; Schurz, Gerhard.
in: Erkenntnis, Jahrgang 85, Nr. 6, 12.2020, S. 1313-1346.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Kornmesser, S & Schurz, G 2020, 'Analyzing Theories in the Frame Model', Erkenntnis, Jg. 85, Nr. 6, S. 1313-1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0078-5
Kornmesser, S., & Schurz, G. (2020). Analyzing Theories in the Frame Model. Erkenntnis, 85(6), 1313-1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0078-5
Kornmesser S, Schurz G. Analyzing Theories in the Frame Model. Erkenntnis. 2020 Dez;85(6):1313-1346. Epub 2018 Nov 8. doi: 10.1007/s10670-018-0078-5
Kornmesser, Stephan ; Schurz, Gerhard. / Analyzing Theories in the Frame Model. in: Erkenntnis. 2020 ; Jahrgang 85, Nr. 6. S. 1313-1346.
Download
@article{06749919efc54b6e88981c8e4a160102,
title = "Analyzing Theories in the Frame Model",
abstract = "The frame model was developed in cognitive psychology and imported into the philosophy of science in order to provide representations of scientific concepts and conceptual taxonomies. The aim of this article is to show that beside the representation of scientific concepts the frame model is an efficient instrument to represent and analyze scientific theories. That is, we aim to establish the frame model as a representation tool for the structure of theories within the philosophy of science. For this, we will develop the notion of a theory frame and distinguish between theory frames for qualitative theories in which scientific measurement is based on nominal scales and theory frames for quantitative theories in which measurement is based on ratio scales. In three case studies, we will apply frames to a psychological, a linguistic, and a physical theory, thereby showing that the frame model is a powerful and intuitively accessible instrument to analyze the laws of scientific theories, the determination of theoretical concepts, the explanatory role of theoretical concepts, the abductive introduction of a new theoretical concept, the distinction between the core and the periphery of a theory, the diachronic development of a theory, and the distinction between qualitative and quantitative scientific concepts. Finally, we will provide a comparison to the structuralist view of theories, one of the most elaborated and applied models of theory representation.",
keywords = "Frame, Qualitative and quantitative measurement, Structuralist view of theories, Theoretical concept, Theory",
author = "Stephan Kornmesser and Gerhard Schurz",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018, Springer Nature B.V.",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1007/s10670-018-0078-5",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "1313--1346",
number = "6",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analyzing Theories in the Frame Model

AU - Kornmesser, Stephan

AU - Schurz, Gerhard

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018, Springer Nature B.V.

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - The frame model was developed in cognitive psychology and imported into the philosophy of science in order to provide representations of scientific concepts and conceptual taxonomies. The aim of this article is to show that beside the representation of scientific concepts the frame model is an efficient instrument to represent and analyze scientific theories. That is, we aim to establish the frame model as a representation tool for the structure of theories within the philosophy of science. For this, we will develop the notion of a theory frame and distinguish between theory frames for qualitative theories in which scientific measurement is based on nominal scales and theory frames for quantitative theories in which measurement is based on ratio scales. In three case studies, we will apply frames to a psychological, a linguistic, and a physical theory, thereby showing that the frame model is a powerful and intuitively accessible instrument to analyze the laws of scientific theories, the determination of theoretical concepts, the explanatory role of theoretical concepts, the abductive introduction of a new theoretical concept, the distinction between the core and the periphery of a theory, the diachronic development of a theory, and the distinction between qualitative and quantitative scientific concepts. Finally, we will provide a comparison to the structuralist view of theories, one of the most elaborated and applied models of theory representation.

AB - The frame model was developed in cognitive psychology and imported into the philosophy of science in order to provide representations of scientific concepts and conceptual taxonomies. The aim of this article is to show that beside the representation of scientific concepts the frame model is an efficient instrument to represent and analyze scientific theories. That is, we aim to establish the frame model as a representation tool for the structure of theories within the philosophy of science. For this, we will develop the notion of a theory frame and distinguish between theory frames for qualitative theories in which scientific measurement is based on nominal scales and theory frames for quantitative theories in which measurement is based on ratio scales. In three case studies, we will apply frames to a psychological, a linguistic, and a physical theory, thereby showing that the frame model is a powerful and intuitively accessible instrument to analyze the laws of scientific theories, the determination of theoretical concepts, the explanatory role of theoretical concepts, the abductive introduction of a new theoretical concept, the distinction between the core and the periphery of a theory, the diachronic development of a theory, and the distinction between qualitative and quantitative scientific concepts. Finally, we will provide a comparison to the structuralist view of theories, one of the most elaborated and applied models of theory representation.

KW - Frame

KW - Qualitative and quantitative measurement

KW - Structuralist view of theories

KW - Theoretical concept

KW - Theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056310545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10670-018-0078-5

DO - 10.1007/s10670-018-0078-5

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 1313

EP - 1346

JO - Erkenntnis

JF - Erkenntnis

IS - 6

ER -