A systematic review of participatory scenario planning to envision mountain social-ecological systems futures

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Jessica P.R. Thorn
  • Julia A. Klein
  • Cara Steger
  • Kelly A. Hopping
  • Claudia Capitani
  • Catherine M. Tucker
  • Anne W. Nolin
  • Robin S. Reid
  • Roman Seidl
  • Vishwas S. Chitale
  • Robert Marchant

Externe Organisationen

  • Colorado State University
  • University of York
  • Universität Kapstadt (UCT)
  • Boise State University
  • University of Florida
  • University of Nevada, Reno
  • International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development Nepal
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer6
Seiten (von - bis)1-55
Seitenumfang55
FachzeitschriftEcology and society
Jahrgang25
Ausgabenummer3
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2020

Abstract

Mountain social-ecological systems (MtSES) provide crucial ecosystem services to over half of humanity. However, populations living in these highly varied regions are now confronted by global change. It is critical that they are able to anticipate change to strategically manage resources and avoid potential conflict. Yet, planning for sustainable, equitable transitions for the future is a daunting task, considering the range of uncertainties and the unique character of MtSES. Participatory scenario planning (PSP) can help MtSES communities by critically reflecting on a wider array of innovative pathways for adaptive transformation. Although the design of effective approaches has been widely discussed, how PSP has been employed in MtSES has yet to be examined. Here, we present the first systematic global review of single- and multiscalar, multisectoral PSP undertaken in MtSES, in which we characterize the process, identify strengths and gaps, and suggest effective ways to apply PSP in MtSES. We used a nine-step process to help guide the analysis of 42 studies from 1989 screened articles. Our results indicate a steady increase in relevant studies since 2006, with 43% published between 2015 and 2017. These studies encompass 39 countries, with over 50% in Europe. PSP in MtSES is used predominantly to build cooperation, social learning, collaboration, and decision support, yet meeting these objectives is hindered by insufficient engagement with intended end users. MtSES PSP has focused largely on envisioning themes of governance, economy, land use change, and biodiversity, but has overlooked themes such as gender equality, public health, and sanitation. There are many avenues to expand and improve PSP in MtSES: to other regions, sectors, across a greater diversity of stakeholders, and with a specific focus on MtSES paradoxes. Communicating uncertainty, monitoring and evaluating impacts, and engendering more comparative approaches can further increase the utility of PSP for addressing MtSES challenges, with lessons for other complex social-ecological systems.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zitieren

A systematic review of participatory scenario planning to envision mountain social-ecological systems futures. / Thorn, Jessica P.R.; Klein, Julia A.; Steger, Cara et al.
in: Ecology and society, Jahrgang 25, Nr. 3, 6, 2020, S. 1-55.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Thorn, JPR, Klein, JA, Steger, C, Hopping, KA, Capitani, C, Tucker, CM, Nolin, AW, Reid, RS, Seidl, R, Chitale, VS & Marchant, R 2020, 'A systematic review of participatory scenario planning to envision mountain social-ecological systems futures', Ecology and society, Jg. 25, Nr. 3, 6, S. 1-55. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11608-250306
Thorn, J. P. R., Klein, J. A., Steger, C., Hopping, K. A., Capitani, C., Tucker, C. M., Nolin, A. W., Reid, R. S., Seidl, R., Chitale, V. S., & Marchant, R. (2020). A systematic review of participatory scenario planning to envision mountain social-ecological systems futures. Ecology and society, 25(3), 1-55. Artikel 6. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11608-250306
Thorn JPR, Klein JA, Steger C, Hopping KA, Capitani C, Tucker CM et al. A systematic review of participatory scenario planning to envision mountain social-ecological systems futures. Ecology and society. 2020;25(3):1-55. 6. doi: 10.5751/ES-11608-250306
Thorn, Jessica P.R. ; Klein, Julia A. ; Steger, Cara et al. / A systematic review of participatory scenario planning to envision mountain social-ecological systems futures. in: Ecology and society. 2020 ; Jahrgang 25, Nr. 3. S. 1-55.
Download
@article{d2c802ad51ef42dd8bdc979c87110d30,
title = "A systematic review of participatory scenario planning to envision mountain social-ecological systems futures",
abstract = "Mountain social-ecological systems (MtSES) provide crucial ecosystem services to over half of humanity. However, populations living in these highly varied regions are now confronted by global change. It is critical that they are able to anticipate change to strategically manage resources and avoid potential conflict. Yet, planning for sustainable, equitable transitions for the future is a daunting task, considering the range of uncertainties and the unique character of MtSES. Participatory scenario planning (PSP) can help MtSES communities by critically reflecting on a wider array of innovative pathways for adaptive transformation. Although the design of effective approaches has been widely discussed, how PSP has been employed in MtSES has yet to be examined. Here, we present the first systematic global review of single- and multiscalar, multisectoral PSP undertaken in MtSES, in which we characterize the process, identify strengths and gaps, and suggest effective ways to apply PSP in MtSES. We used a nine-step process to help guide the analysis of 42 studies from 1989 screened articles. Our results indicate a steady increase in relevant studies since 2006, with 43% published between 2015 and 2017. These studies encompass 39 countries, with over 50% in Europe. PSP in MtSES is used predominantly to build cooperation, social learning, collaboration, and decision support, yet meeting these objectives is hindered by insufficient engagement with intended end users. MtSES PSP has focused largely on envisioning themes of governance, economy, land use change, and biodiversity, but has overlooked themes such as gender equality, public health, and sanitation. There are many avenues to expand and improve PSP in MtSES: to other regions, sectors, across a greater diversity of stakeholders, and with a specific focus on MtSES paradoxes. Communicating uncertainty, monitoring and evaluating impacts, and engendering more comparative approaches can further increase the utility of PSP for addressing MtSES challenges, with lessons for other complex social-ecological systems.",
keywords = "Adaptive transformation, Alpine, Coupled natural-human systems, Highlands, Montane, Planetary boundaries, Stewardship, Sustainability science, Transdisciplinary",
author = "Thorn, {Jessica P.R.} and Klein, {Julia A.} and Cara Steger and Hopping, {Kelly A.} and Claudia Capitani and Tucker, {Catherine M.} and Nolin, {Anne W.} and Reid, {Robin S.} and Roman Seidl and Chitale, {Vishwas S.} and Robert Marchant",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 by the author(s).",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.5751/ES-11608-250306",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1--55",
journal = "Ecology and society",
issn = "1708-3087",
publisher = "The Resilience Alliance",
number = "3",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of participatory scenario planning to envision mountain social-ecological systems futures

AU - Thorn, Jessica P.R.

AU - Klein, Julia A.

AU - Steger, Cara

AU - Hopping, Kelly A.

AU - Capitani, Claudia

AU - Tucker, Catherine M.

AU - Nolin, Anne W.

AU - Reid, Robin S.

AU - Seidl, Roman

AU - Chitale, Vishwas S.

AU - Marchant, Robert

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 by the author(s).

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Mountain social-ecological systems (MtSES) provide crucial ecosystem services to over half of humanity. However, populations living in these highly varied regions are now confronted by global change. It is critical that they are able to anticipate change to strategically manage resources and avoid potential conflict. Yet, planning for sustainable, equitable transitions for the future is a daunting task, considering the range of uncertainties and the unique character of MtSES. Participatory scenario planning (PSP) can help MtSES communities by critically reflecting on a wider array of innovative pathways for adaptive transformation. Although the design of effective approaches has been widely discussed, how PSP has been employed in MtSES has yet to be examined. Here, we present the first systematic global review of single- and multiscalar, multisectoral PSP undertaken in MtSES, in which we characterize the process, identify strengths and gaps, and suggest effective ways to apply PSP in MtSES. We used a nine-step process to help guide the analysis of 42 studies from 1989 screened articles. Our results indicate a steady increase in relevant studies since 2006, with 43% published between 2015 and 2017. These studies encompass 39 countries, with over 50% in Europe. PSP in MtSES is used predominantly to build cooperation, social learning, collaboration, and decision support, yet meeting these objectives is hindered by insufficient engagement with intended end users. MtSES PSP has focused largely on envisioning themes of governance, economy, land use change, and biodiversity, but has overlooked themes such as gender equality, public health, and sanitation. There are many avenues to expand and improve PSP in MtSES: to other regions, sectors, across a greater diversity of stakeholders, and with a specific focus on MtSES paradoxes. Communicating uncertainty, monitoring and evaluating impacts, and engendering more comparative approaches can further increase the utility of PSP for addressing MtSES challenges, with lessons for other complex social-ecological systems.

AB - Mountain social-ecological systems (MtSES) provide crucial ecosystem services to over half of humanity. However, populations living in these highly varied regions are now confronted by global change. It is critical that they are able to anticipate change to strategically manage resources and avoid potential conflict. Yet, planning for sustainable, equitable transitions for the future is a daunting task, considering the range of uncertainties and the unique character of MtSES. Participatory scenario planning (PSP) can help MtSES communities by critically reflecting on a wider array of innovative pathways for adaptive transformation. Although the design of effective approaches has been widely discussed, how PSP has been employed in MtSES has yet to be examined. Here, we present the first systematic global review of single- and multiscalar, multisectoral PSP undertaken in MtSES, in which we characterize the process, identify strengths and gaps, and suggest effective ways to apply PSP in MtSES. We used a nine-step process to help guide the analysis of 42 studies from 1989 screened articles. Our results indicate a steady increase in relevant studies since 2006, with 43% published between 2015 and 2017. These studies encompass 39 countries, with over 50% in Europe. PSP in MtSES is used predominantly to build cooperation, social learning, collaboration, and decision support, yet meeting these objectives is hindered by insufficient engagement with intended end users. MtSES PSP has focused largely on envisioning themes of governance, economy, land use change, and biodiversity, but has overlooked themes such as gender equality, public health, and sanitation. There are many avenues to expand and improve PSP in MtSES: to other regions, sectors, across a greater diversity of stakeholders, and with a specific focus on MtSES paradoxes. Communicating uncertainty, monitoring and evaluating impacts, and engendering more comparative approaches can further increase the utility of PSP for addressing MtSES challenges, with lessons for other complex social-ecological systems.

KW - Adaptive transformation

KW - Alpine

KW - Coupled natural-human systems

KW - Highlands

KW - Montane

KW - Planetary boundaries

KW - Stewardship

KW - Sustainability science

KW - Transdisciplinary

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090815226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5751/ES-11608-250306

DO - 10.5751/ES-11608-250306

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85090815226

VL - 25

SP - 1

EP - 55

JO - Ecology and society

JF - Ecology and society

SN - 1708-3087

IS - 3

M1 - 6

ER -