Details
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 40-49 |
| Seitenumfang | 10 |
| Fachzeitschrift | European Journal of Cancer |
| Jahrgang | 50 |
| Ausgabenummer | 1 |
| Frühes Online-Datum | 4 Sept. 2013 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - Jan. 2014 |
Abstract
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) imposes a substantial health burden on patients and society. In recent years, advances in the treatment of mCRC have mainly resulted from the introduction of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs). However, the application of these MoAbs considerably increases treatment costs. The objective of this article is to review and assess the economic evidence of MoAB treatment in mCRC. A systematic literature review was conducted and cost-effectiveness (CE) as well as cost-utility-studies were identified. For this, Medline, Embase, SciSearch, Cochrane, and nine other databases were searched from 2000 through February 2013 for full-text publications. The quality of the studies was assessed via a validated assessment tool (Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES)). A total of 843 publications were screened. Of those, 15 studies involving the MoAbs bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab met all inclusion criteria. Four studies analysed the CE of first-line treatment with bevacizumab and nine the CE of cetuximab in subsequent treatment lines. Two studies dealt with the CE of panitumumab. The analysis of sequential regimes and the direct comparison of two MoABs were analysed by only one study each. The quality of the included studies was high with the exception of one study. Conclusions The treatment with bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab is mainly considered to be not cost-effective in patients with mCRC. However, testing for Kirsten ras oncogene (KRAS) mutation prior to the treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab is found to be clearly cost-effective compared to no testing. Future research should focus on the CE of first-line treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab and studies on upcoming agents like regorafenib and aflibercept.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Medizin (insg.)
- Onkologie
- Biochemie, Genetik und Molekularbiologie (insg.)
- Krebsforschung
Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: European Journal of Cancer, Jahrgang 50, Nr. 1, 01.2014, S. 40-49.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Übersichtsarbeit › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer
AU - Lange, A.
AU - Prenzler, A.
AU - Frank, M.
AU - Kirstein, M.
AU - Vogel, A.
AU - Von Der Schulenburg, J. M.
N1 - Funding Information: The study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).
PY - 2014/1
Y1 - 2014/1
N2 - Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) imposes a substantial health burden on patients and society. In recent years, advances in the treatment of mCRC have mainly resulted from the introduction of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs). However, the application of these MoAbs considerably increases treatment costs. The objective of this article is to review and assess the economic evidence of MoAB treatment in mCRC. A systematic literature review was conducted and cost-effectiveness (CE) as well as cost-utility-studies were identified. For this, Medline, Embase, SciSearch, Cochrane, and nine other databases were searched from 2000 through February 2013 for full-text publications. The quality of the studies was assessed via a validated assessment tool (Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES)). A total of 843 publications were screened. Of those, 15 studies involving the MoAbs bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab met all inclusion criteria. Four studies analysed the CE of first-line treatment with bevacizumab and nine the CE of cetuximab in subsequent treatment lines. Two studies dealt with the CE of panitumumab. The analysis of sequential regimes and the direct comparison of two MoABs were analysed by only one study each. The quality of the included studies was high with the exception of one study. Conclusions The treatment with bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab is mainly considered to be not cost-effective in patients with mCRC. However, testing for Kirsten ras oncogene (KRAS) mutation prior to the treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab is found to be clearly cost-effective compared to no testing. Future research should focus on the CE of first-line treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab and studies on upcoming agents like regorafenib and aflibercept.
AB - Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) imposes a substantial health burden on patients and society. In recent years, advances in the treatment of mCRC have mainly resulted from the introduction of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs). However, the application of these MoAbs considerably increases treatment costs. The objective of this article is to review and assess the economic evidence of MoAB treatment in mCRC. A systematic literature review was conducted and cost-effectiveness (CE) as well as cost-utility-studies were identified. For this, Medline, Embase, SciSearch, Cochrane, and nine other databases were searched from 2000 through February 2013 for full-text publications. The quality of the studies was assessed via a validated assessment tool (Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES)). A total of 843 publications were screened. Of those, 15 studies involving the MoAbs bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab met all inclusion criteria. Four studies analysed the CE of first-line treatment with bevacizumab and nine the CE of cetuximab in subsequent treatment lines. Two studies dealt with the CE of panitumumab. The analysis of sequential regimes and the direct comparison of two MoABs were analysed by only one study each. The quality of the included studies was high with the exception of one study. Conclusions The treatment with bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab is mainly considered to be not cost-effective in patients with mCRC. However, testing for Kirsten ras oncogene (KRAS) mutation prior to the treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab is found to be clearly cost-effective compared to no testing. Future research should focus on the CE of first-line treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab and studies on upcoming agents like regorafenib and aflibercept.
KW - Advanced colorectal cancer
KW - Bevacizumab
KW - Cetuximab
KW - Cost-effectiveness analysis
KW - Cost-utility analysis
KW - Health economics
KW - Metastatic colorectal cancer
KW - Monoclonal antibody
KW - Panitumumab
KW - Targeted therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891634642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.008
M3 - Review article
C2 - 24011538
AN - SCOPUS:84891634642
VL - 50
SP - 40
EP - 49
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
SN - 0959-8049
IS - 1
ER -