Details
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Seiten (von - bis) | 1-9 |
Seitenumfang | 9 |
Fachzeitschrift | Ecological Modelling |
Jahrgang | 390 |
Frühes Online-Datum | 29 Okt. 2018 |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 24 Dez. 2018 |
Abstract
The scaling exponent of the biomass-density relationship of even-aged plant populations – often described as the slope of the self-thinning line - and its presumed universality has been a subject of debate for a long time. Comprehensive observational studies, mainly in the last century, yielded even shifting slopes, for which, until now, the theoretical basis was not fully clarified. With a new mechanistic individual-based plant growth model, the BETTINA_ibm that considered allometric adaptation to resource supply, we identified two regimes of the self-thinning process: (i) The Geometrical thinning, which is driven by the ground area occupied by individual plants. For this, the slope is controlled by the allometric relations of the plant and thus roughly fitting the −3/2 power law. Age dependent processes impacting the allometry (e.g., secondary girth growth) result in a deviation from the original geometrical assumptions, and this may alter the slope accordingly. The intercept depends on species-specific allometric relations, site characteristics and the competition mode. (ii) The Maximum maintainable biomass per ground area, for which, if reached, the slope is −1. The intercept depends on resource supply (light and below-ground resources), as derived by the logarithm of the maximum total volume per area. The actual self-thinning line follows the minimum of both lines, and it is capped by the maximum individual plant size. Depending on the intercepts of (i) and (ii), the slope of the self-thinning line may be controlled by (i) geometrical thinning, (ii) resource limitation, or a switch between both. These two regimes and the shift from one to the other comply with experimental observations from the literature. Overall, morphological plasticity explains the variability of the slope of the self-thinning line when geometrical thinning is dominating.
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete
- Umweltwissenschaften (insg.)
- Ökologische Modellierung
Zitieren
- Standard
- Harvard
- Apa
- Vancouver
- BibTex
- RIS
in: Ecological Modelling, Jahrgang 390, 24.12.2018, S. 1-9.
Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Forschung › Peer-Review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A new mechanistic theory of self-thinning
T2 - Adaptive behaviour of plants explains the shape and slope of self-thinning trajectories
AU - Peters, Ronny
AU - Olagoke, Adewole
AU - Berger, Uta
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/12/24
Y1 - 2018/12/24
N2 - The scaling exponent of the biomass-density relationship of even-aged plant populations – often described as the slope of the self-thinning line - and its presumed universality has been a subject of debate for a long time. Comprehensive observational studies, mainly in the last century, yielded even shifting slopes, for which, until now, the theoretical basis was not fully clarified. With a new mechanistic individual-based plant growth model, the BETTINA_ibm that considered allometric adaptation to resource supply, we identified two regimes of the self-thinning process: (i) The Geometrical thinning, which is driven by the ground area occupied by individual plants. For this, the slope is controlled by the allometric relations of the plant and thus roughly fitting the −3/2 power law. Age dependent processes impacting the allometry (e.g., secondary girth growth) result in a deviation from the original geometrical assumptions, and this may alter the slope accordingly. The intercept depends on species-specific allometric relations, site characteristics and the competition mode. (ii) The Maximum maintainable biomass per ground area, for which, if reached, the slope is −1. The intercept depends on resource supply (light and below-ground resources), as derived by the logarithm of the maximum total volume per area. The actual self-thinning line follows the minimum of both lines, and it is capped by the maximum individual plant size. Depending on the intercepts of (i) and (ii), the slope of the self-thinning line may be controlled by (i) geometrical thinning, (ii) resource limitation, or a switch between both. These two regimes and the shift from one to the other comply with experimental observations from the literature. Overall, morphological plasticity explains the variability of the slope of the self-thinning line when geometrical thinning is dominating.
AB - The scaling exponent of the biomass-density relationship of even-aged plant populations – often described as the slope of the self-thinning line - and its presumed universality has been a subject of debate for a long time. Comprehensive observational studies, mainly in the last century, yielded even shifting slopes, for which, until now, the theoretical basis was not fully clarified. With a new mechanistic individual-based plant growth model, the BETTINA_ibm that considered allometric adaptation to resource supply, we identified two regimes of the self-thinning process: (i) The Geometrical thinning, which is driven by the ground area occupied by individual plants. For this, the slope is controlled by the allometric relations of the plant and thus roughly fitting the −3/2 power law. Age dependent processes impacting the allometry (e.g., secondary girth growth) result in a deviation from the original geometrical assumptions, and this may alter the slope accordingly. The intercept depends on species-specific allometric relations, site characteristics and the competition mode. (ii) The Maximum maintainable biomass per ground area, for which, if reached, the slope is −1. The intercept depends on resource supply (light and below-ground resources), as derived by the logarithm of the maximum total volume per area. The actual self-thinning line follows the minimum of both lines, and it is capped by the maximum individual plant size. Depending on the intercepts of (i) and (ii), the slope of the self-thinning line may be controlled by (i) geometrical thinning, (ii) resource limitation, or a switch between both. These two regimes and the shift from one to the other comply with experimental observations from the literature. Overall, morphological plasticity explains the variability of the slope of the self-thinning line when geometrical thinning is dominating.
KW - Allometric plasticity
KW - Biomass-density relationship
KW - Individual-based modelling
KW - Resource limitation
KW - Scaling exponent
KW - Self-thinning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055499523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.10.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.10.005
M3 - Article
VL - 390
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Ecological Modelling
JF - Ecological Modelling
SN - 0304-3800
ER -