A new mechanistic theory of self-thinning: Adaptive behaviour of plants explains the shape and slope of self-thinning trajectories

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autoren

  • Ronny Peters
  • Adewole Olagoke
  • Uta Berger

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Technische Universität Dresden
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1-9
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftEcological Modelling
Jahrgang390
Frühes Online-Datum29 Okt. 2018
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 24 Dez. 2018

Abstract

The scaling exponent of the biomass-density relationship of even-aged plant populations – often described as the slope of the self-thinning line - and its presumed universality has been a subject of debate for a long time. Comprehensive observational studies, mainly in the last century, yielded even shifting slopes, for which, until now, the theoretical basis was not fully clarified. With a new mechanistic individual-based plant growth model, the BETTINA_ibm that considered allometric adaptation to resource supply, we identified two regimes of the self-thinning process: (i) The Geometrical thinning, which is driven by the ground area occupied by individual plants. For this, the slope is controlled by the allometric relations of the plant and thus roughly fitting the −3/2 power law. Age dependent processes impacting the allometry (e.g., secondary girth growth) result in a deviation from the original geometrical assumptions, and this may alter the slope accordingly. The intercept depends on species-specific allometric relations, site characteristics and the competition mode. (ii) The Maximum maintainable biomass per ground area, for which, if reached, the slope is −1. The intercept depends on resource supply (light and below-ground resources), as derived by the logarithm of the maximum total volume per area. The actual self-thinning line follows the minimum of both lines, and it is capped by the maximum individual plant size. Depending on the intercepts of (i) and (ii), the slope of the self-thinning line may be controlled by (i) geometrical thinning, (ii) resource limitation, or a switch between both. These two regimes and the shift from one to the other comply with experimental observations from the literature. Overall, morphological plasticity explains the variability of the slope of the self-thinning line when geometrical thinning is dominating.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

A new mechanistic theory of self-thinning: Adaptive behaviour of plants explains the shape and slope of self-thinning trajectories. / Peters, Ronny; Olagoke, Adewole; Berger, Uta.
in: Ecological Modelling, Jahrgang 390, 24.12.2018, S. 1-9.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Peters R, Olagoke A, Berger U. A new mechanistic theory of self-thinning: Adaptive behaviour of plants explains the shape and slope of self-thinning trajectories. Ecological Modelling. 2018 Dez 24;390:1-9. Epub 2018 Okt 29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.10.005
Download
@article{8981abb3486b4f008e08b4fda5096459,
title = "A new mechanistic theory of self-thinning: Adaptive behaviour of plants explains the shape and slope of self-thinning trajectories",
abstract = "The scaling exponent of the biomass-density relationship of even-aged plant populations – often described as the slope of the self-thinning line - and its presumed universality has been a subject of debate for a long time. Comprehensive observational studies, mainly in the last century, yielded even shifting slopes, for which, until now, the theoretical basis was not fully clarified. With a new mechanistic individual-based plant growth model, the BETTINA_ibm that considered allometric adaptation to resource supply, we identified two regimes of the self-thinning process: (i) The Geometrical thinning, which is driven by the ground area occupied by individual plants. For this, the slope is controlled by the allometric relations of the plant and thus roughly fitting the −3/2 power law. Age dependent processes impacting the allometry (e.g., secondary girth growth) result in a deviation from the original geometrical assumptions, and this may alter the slope accordingly. The intercept depends on species-specific allometric relations, site characteristics and the competition mode. (ii) The Maximum maintainable biomass per ground area, for which, if reached, the slope is −1. The intercept depends on resource supply (light and below-ground resources), as derived by the logarithm of the maximum total volume per area. The actual self-thinning line follows the minimum of both lines, and it is capped by the maximum individual plant size. Depending on the intercepts of (i) and (ii), the slope of the self-thinning line may be controlled by (i) geometrical thinning, (ii) resource limitation, or a switch between both. These two regimes and the shift from one to the other comply with experimental observations from the literature. Overall, morphological plasticity explains the variability of the slope of the self-thinning line when geometrical thinning is dominating.",
keywords = "Allometric plasticity, Biomass-density relationship, Individual-based modelling, Resource limitation, Scaling exponent, Self-thinning",
author = "Ronny Peters and Adewole Olagoke and Uta Berger",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.10.005",
language = "English",
volume = "390",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Ecological Modelling",
issn = "0304-3800",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new mechanistic theory of self-thinning

T2 - Adaptive behaviour of plants explains the shape and slope of self-thinning trajectories

AU - Peters, Ronny

AU - Olagoke, Adewole

AU - Berger, Uta

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2018/12/24

Y1 - 2018/12/24

N2 - The scaling exponent of the biomass-density relationship of even-aged plant populations – often described as the slope of the self-thinning line - and its presumed universality has been a subject of debate for a long time. Comprehensive observational studies, mainly in the last century, yielded even shifting slopes, for which, until now, the theoretical basis was not fully clarified. With a new mechanistic individual-based plant growth model, the BETTINA_ibm that considered allometric adaptation to resource supply, we identified two regimes of the self-thinning process: (i) The Geometrical thinning, which is driven by the ground area occupied by individual plants. For this, the slope is controlled by the allometric relations of the plant and thus roughly fitting the −3/2 power law. Age dependent processes impacting the allometry (e.g., secondary girth growth) result in a deviation from the original geometrical assumptions, and this may alter the slope accordingly. The intercept depends on species-specific allometric relations, site characteristics and the competition mode. (ii) The Maximum maintainable biomass per ground area, for which, if reached, the slope is −1. The intercept depends on resource supply (light and below-ground resources), as derived by the logarithm of the maximum total volume per area. The actual self-thinning line follows the minimum of both lines, and it is capped by the maximum individual plant size. Depending on the intercepts of (i) and (ii), the slope of the self-thinning line may be controlled by (i) geometrical thinning, (ii) resource limitation, or a switch between both. These two regimes and the shift from one to the other comply with experimental observations from the literature. Overall, morphological plasticity explains the variability of the slope of the self-thinning line when geometrical thinning is dominating.

AB - The scaling exponent of the biomass-density relationship of even-aged plant populations – often described as the slope of the self-thinning line - and its presumed universality has been a subject of debate for a long time. Comprehensive observational studies, mainly in the last century, yielded even shifting slopes, for which, until now, the theoretical basis was not fully clarified. With a new mechanistic individual-based plant growth model, the BETTINA_ibm that considered allometric adaptation to resource supply, we identified two regimes of the self-thinning process: (i) The Geometrical thinning, which is driven by the ground area occupied by individual plants. For this, the slope is controlled by the allometric relations of the plant and thus roughly fitting the −3/2 power law. Age dependent processes impacting the allometry (e.g., secondary girth growth) result in a deviation from the original geometrical assumptions, and this may alter the slope accordingly. The intercept depends on species-specific allometric relations, site characteristics and the competition mode. (ii) The Maximum maintainable biomass per ground area, for which, if reached, the slope is −1. The intercept depends on resource supply (light and below-ground resources), as derived by the logarithm of the maximum total volume per area. The actual self-thinning line follows the minimum of both lines, and it is capped by the maximum individual plant size. Depending on the intercepts of (i) and (ii), the slope of the self-thinning line may be controlled by (i) geometrical thinning, (ii) resource limitation, or a switch between both. These two regimes and the shift from one to the other comply with experimental observations from the literature. Overall, morphological plasticity explains the variability of the slope of the self-thinning line when geometrical thinning is dominating.

KW - Allometric plasticity

KW - Biomass-density relationship

KW - Individual-based modelling

KW - Resource limitation

KW - Scaling exponent

KW - Self-thinning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055499523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.10.005

M3 - Article

VL - 390

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Ecological Modelling

JF - Ecological Modelling

SN - 0304-3800

ER -