A comparison of different nanostructured biomaterials in subcutaneous tissue

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Julia C. Vogt
  • Gudrun Brandes
  • Ilka Krüger
  • Peter Behrens
  • Ingo Nolte
  • Thomas Lenarz
  • Martin Stieve

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH)
  • Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
Forschungs-netzwerk anzeigen

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)2629-2636
Seitenumfang8
FachzeitschriftJournal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
Jahrgang19
Ausgabenummer7
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 16 Jan. 2008

Abstract

The nanostructured surface of a material can improve its interaction with cells and its acceptance as an implant. We compared two novel biomaterials with different nanostructures: Bioverit® II with a coating of nanoporous silica and chitosan-hydroxyapatite composite materials. Pure Bioverit® II served as a control. Platelets of these materials were implanted for 28, 85 and 300 days in the subcutaneous tissue in the neck of 38 rabbits. After excising the specimens they were fixed, embedded in epoxy resin and analyzed histologically. All coated Bioverit® II implants showed a thin capsule of connective tissue. After 300 days, these capsules tended to be thicker than in pure Bioverit® II. No signs of inflammation were observed and the materials appeared unaltered by visual inspection. In case of chitosan-hydroxyapatite composites, massive capsules consisting of dense connective tissue were found, and the material showed signs of biodegradation in form of fissures and cavities. In conclusion, the nanoporous coating showed no obvious positive effect with regard to capsule formation; the chitosan-hydroxyapatite implants provoked a stronger interaction between cells and material. However, most Bioverit® II implants showed no alterations optically, whereas chitosan-hydroxyapatite was partly degraded in all cases.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

A comparison of different nanostructured biomaterials in subcutaneous tissue. / Vogt, Julia C.; Brandes, Gudrun; Krüger, Ilka et al.
in: Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, Jahrgang 19, Nr. 7, 16.01.2008, S. 2629-2636.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Vogt, JC, Brandes, G, Krüger, I, Behrens, P, Nolte, I, Lenarz, T & Stieve, M 2008, 'A comparison of different nanostructured biomaterials in subcutaneous tissue', Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, Jg. 19, Nr. 7, S. 2629-2636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3353-6
Vogt, J. C., Brandes, G., Krüger, I., Behrens, P., Nolte, I., Lenarz, T., & Stieve, M. (2008). A comparison of different nanostructured biomaterials in subcutaneous tissue. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 19(7), 2629-2636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3353-6
Vogt JC, Brandes G, Krüger I, Behrens P, Nolte I, Lenarz T et al. A comparison of different nanostructured biomaterials in subcutaneous tissue. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2008 Jan 16;19(7):2629-2636. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3353-6
Vogt, Julia C. ; Brandes, Gudrun ; Krüger, Ilka et al. / A comparison of different nanostructured biomaterials in subcutaneous tissue. in: Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2008 ; Jahrgang 19, Nr. 7. S. 2629-2636.
Download
@article{ba9124c076dc4e7aa7b938833293dcc8,
title = "A comparison of different nanostructured biomaterials in subcutaneous tissue",
abstract = "The nanostructured surface of a material can improve its interaction with cells and its acceptance as an implant. We compared two novel biomaterials with different nanostructures: Bioverit{\textregistered} II with a coating of nanoporous silica and chitosan-hydroxyapatite composite materials. Pure Bioverit{\textregistered} II served as a control. Platelets of these materials were implanted for 28, 85 and 300 days in the subcutaneous tissue in the neck of 38 rabbits. After excising the specimens they were fixed, embedded in epoxy resin and analyzed histologically. All coated Bioverit{\textregistered} II implants showed a thin capsule of connective tissue. After 300 days, these capsules tended to be thicker than in pure Bioverit{\textregistered} II. No signs of inflammation were observed and the materials appeared unaltered by visual inspection. In case of chitosan-hydroxyapatite composites, massive capsules consisting of dense connective tissue were found, and the material showed signs of biodegradation in form of fissures and cavities. In conclusion, the nanoporous coating showed no obvious positive effect with regard to capsule formation; the chitosan-hydroxyapatite implants provoked a stronger interaction between cells and material. However, most Bioverit{\textregistered} II implants showed no alterations optically, whereas chitosan-hydroxyapatite was partly degraded in all cases.",
author = "Vogt, {Julia C.} and Gudrun Brandes and Ilka Kr{\"u}ger and Peter Behrens and Ingo Nolte and Thomas Lenarz and Martin Stieve",
note = "Funding information: This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG-SFB Collaborative Research Centre 599). The authors would like to thank Peter Erfurt from Department of Otolaryngology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover for technical support.",
year = "2008",
month = jan,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1007/s10856-007-3353-6",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "2629--2636",
journal = "Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine",
issn = "0957-4530",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "7",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of different nanostructured biomaterials in subcutaneous tissue

AU - Vogt, Julia C.

AU - Brandes, Gudrun

AU - Krüger, Ilka

AU - Behrens, Peter

AU - Nolte, Ingo

AU - Lenarz, Thomas

AU - Stieve, Martin

N1 - Funding information: This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG-SFB Collaborative Research Centre 599). The authors would like to thank Peter Erfurt from Department of Otolaryngology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover for technical support.

PY - 2008/1/16

Y1 - 2008/1/16

N2 - The nanostructured surface of a material can improve its interaction with cells and its acceptance as an implant. We compared two novel biomaterials with different nanostructures: Bioverit® II with a coating of nanoporous silica and chitosan-hydroxyapatite composite materials. Pure Bioverit® II served as a control. Platelets of these materials were implanted for 28, 85 and 300 days in the subcutaneous tissue in the neck of 38 rabbits. After excising the specimens they were fixed, embedded in epoxy resin and analyzed histologically. All coated Bioverit® II implants showed a thin capsule of connective tissue. After 300 days, these capsules tended to be thicker than in pure Bioverit® II. No signs of inflammation were observed and the materials appeared unaltered by visual inspection. In case of chitosan-hydroxyapatite composites, massive capsules consisting of dense connective tissue were found, and the material showed signs of biodegradation in form of fissures and cavities. In conclusion, the nanoporous coating showed no obvious positive effect with regard to capsule formation; the chitosan-hydroxyapatite implants provoked a stronger interaction between cells and material. However, most Bioverit® II implants showed no alterations optically, whereas chitosan-hydroxyapatite was partly degraded in all cases.

AB - The nanostructured surface of a material can improve its interaction with cells and its acceptance as an implant. We compared two novel biomaterials with different nanostructures: Bioverit® II with a coating of nanoporous silica and chitosan-hydroxyapatite composite materials. Pure Bioverit® II served as a control. Platelets of these materials were implanted for 28, 85 and 300 days in the subcutaneous tissue in the neck of 38 rabbits. After excising the specimens they were fixed, embedded in epoxy resin and analyzed histologically. All coated Bioverit® II implants showed a thin capsule of connective tissue. After 300 days, these capsules tended to be thicker than in pure Bioverit® II. No signs of inflammation were observed and the materials appeared unaltered by visual inspection. In case of chitosan-hydroxyapatite composites, massive capsules consisting of dense connective tissue were found, and the material showed signs of biodegradation in form of fissures and cavities. In conclusion, the nanoporous coating showed no obvious positive effect with regard to capsule formation; the chitosan-hydroxyapatite implants provoked a stronger interaction between cells and material. However, most Bioverit® II implants showed no alterations optically, whereas chitosan-hydroxyapatite was partly degraded in all cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73149122794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10856-007-3353-6

DO - 10.1007/s10856-007-3353-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:73149122794

VL - 19

SP - 2629

EP - 2636

JO - Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

JF - Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

SN - 0957-4530

IS - 7

ER -