Loading [MathJax]/extensions/tex2jax.js

21.2%-efficient fineline-printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Autorschaft

  • Helge Hannebauer
  • Thorsten Dullweber
  • Ulrike Baumann
  • Tom Falcon
  • Rolf Brendel

Organisationseinheiten

Externe Organisationen

  • Institut für Solarenergieforschung GmbH (ISFH)
  • DEK Printing Solutions (ASMPT)

Details

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Seiten (von - bis)675-679
Seitenumfang5
FachzeitschriftPhysica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters
Jahrgang8
Ausgabenummer8
Frühes Online-Datum3 Juni 2014
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Aug. 2014

Abstract

We evaluate industrial-type PERC solar cells applying a 5 busbar front grid and fineline-printed Ag fingers. We obtain finger widths down to 46 μm when using a stencil with 40 μm opening for the finger print, whereas the busbar is printed in a separate printing step with a different Ag paste (dual print). This compares to finger widths of 62 μm to 66 μm when applying print-on-print. The 5 busbar front grid with the best dual print process reduces the shadowing loss of the front grid to 4.0% compared to 5.8% for a conventional 3 busbar front grid printed with print-on-print. The 1.8% reduction in shadowing loss results in equal parts from the reduced finger width with dual print as well as from a reduced total busbar width of the 5 busbar design. The resulting PERC solar cells with 5 busbars demonstrate independently confirmed conversion efficiencies of 21.2% compared to 20.6% efficiency of the 3 busbar PERC solar cell. The increased conversion efficiency is primarily due to an increased short-circuit current resulting from the reduced shadowing loss. To our knowledge, 21.2% conversion efficiency is the highest value reported so far for industry typical silicon solar cells with printed metal front and rear contacts.

ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete

Zitieren

21.2%-efficient fineline-printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid. / Hannebauer, Helge; Dullweber, Thorsten; Baumann, Ulrike et al.
in: Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters, Jahrgang 8, Nr. 8, 08.2014, S. 675-679.

Publikation: Beitrag in FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungPeer-Review

Hannebauer H, Dullweber T, Baumann U, Falcon T, Brendel R. 21.2%-efficient fineline-printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid. Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters. 2014 Aug;8(8):675-679. Epub 2014 Jun 3. doi: 10.1002/pssr.201409190
Hannebauer, Helge ; Dullweber, Thorsten ; Baumann, Ulrike et al. / 21.2%-efficient fineline-printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid. in: Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters. 2014 ; Jahrgang 8, Nr. 8. S. 675-679.
Download
@article{db8bf50b4d124e6c856336981a85f6a1,
title = "21.2%-efficient fineline-printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid",
abstract = "We evaluate industrial-type PERC solar cells applying a 5 busbar front grid and fineline-printed Ag fingers. We obtain finger widths down to 46 μm when using a stencil with 40 μm opening for the finger print, whereas the busbar is printed in a separate printing step with a different Ag paste (dual print). This compares to finger widths of 62 μm to 66 μm when applying print-on-print. The 5 busbar front grid with the best dual print process reduces the shadowing loss of the front grid to 4.0% compared to 5.8% for a conventional 3 busbar front grid printed with print-on-print. The 1.8% reduction in shadowing loss results in equal parts from the reduced finger width with dual print as well as from a reduced total busbar width of the 5 busbar design. The resulting PERC solar cells with 5 busbars demonstrate independently confirmed conversion efficiencies of 21.2% compared to 20.6% efficiency of the 3 busbar PERC solar cell. The increased conversion efficiency is primarily due to an increased short-circuit current resulting from the reduced shadowing loss. To our knowledge, 21.2% conversion efficiency is the highest value reported so far for industry typical silicon solar cells with printed metal front and rear contacts.",
keywords = "Efficiency, Passivated emitter and rear cells, Silicon, Solar cells",
author = "Helge Hannebauer and Thorsten Dullweber and Ulrike Baumann and Tom Falcon and Rolf Brendel",
note = "Acknowledgements We thank our colleagues at ISFH for support in solar cell processing. This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conserva-tion and Nuclear Safety within the R&D project HighScreen and by our industry partners SolarWorld, Heraeus, Singulus Tech-nologies, and Rena.",
year = "2014",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1002/pssr.201409190",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "675--679",
journal = "Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters",
issn = "1862-6254",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "8",

}

Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - 21.2%-efficient fineline-printed PERC solar cell with 5 busbar front grid

AU - Hannebauer, Helge

AU - Dullweber, Thorsten

AU - Baumann, Ulrike

AU - Falcon, Tom

AU - Brendel, Rolf

N1 - Acknowledgements We thank our colleagues at ISFH for support in solar cell processing. This work was funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conserva-tion and Nuclear Safety within the R&D project HighScreen and by our industry partners SolarWorld, Heraeus, Singulus Tech-nologies, and Rena.

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - We evaluate industrial-type PERC solar cells applying a 5 busbar front grid and fineline-printed Ag fingers. We obtain finger widths down to 46 μm when using a stencil with 40 μm opening for the finger print, whereas the busbar is printed in a separate printing step with a different Ag paste (dual print). This compares to finger widths of 62 μm to 66 μm when applying print-on-print. The 5 busbar front grid with the best dual print process reduces the shadowing loss of the front grid to 4.0% compared to 5.8% for a conventional 3 busbar front grid printed with print-on-print. The 1.8% reduction in shadowing loss results in equal parts from the reduced finger width with dual print as well as from a reduced total busbar width of the 5 busbar design. The resulting PERC solar cells with 5 busbars demonstrate independently confirmed conversion efficiencies of 21.2% compared to 20.6% efficiency of the 3 busbar PERC solar cell. The increased conversion efficiency is primarily due to an increased short-circuit current resulting from the reduced shadowing loss. To our knowledge, 21.2% conversion efficiency is the highest value reported so far for industry typical silicon solar cells with printed metal front and rear contacts.

AB - We evaluate industrial-type PERC solar cells applying a 5 busbar front grid and fineline-printed Ag fingers. We obtain finger widths down to 46 μm when using a stencil with 40 μm opening for the finger print, whereas the busbar is printed in a separate printing step with a different Ag paste (dual print). This compares to finger widths of 62 μm to 66 μm when applying print-on-print. The 5 busbar front grid with the best dual print process reduces the shadowing loss of the front grid to 4.0% compared to 5.8% for a conventional 3 busbar front grid printed with print-on-print. The 1.8% reduction in shadowing loss results in equal parts from the reduced finger width with dual print as well as from a reduced total busbar width of the 5 busbar design. The resulting PERC solar cells with 5 busbars demonstrate independently confirmed conversion efficiencies of 21.2% compared to 20.6% efficiency of the 3 busbar PERC solar cell. The increased conversion efficiency is primarily due to an increased short-circuit current resulting from the reduced shadowing loss. To our knowledge, 21.2% conversion efficiency is the highest value reported so far for industry typical silicon solar cells with printed metal front and rear contacts.

KW - Efficiency

KW - Passivated emitter and rear cells

KW - Silicon

KW - Solar cells

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905906224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pssr.201409190

DO - 10.1002/pssr.201409190

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84905906224

VL - 8

SP - 675

EP - 679

JO - Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters

JF - Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters

SN - 1862-6254

IS - 8

ER -